FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2076834189> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2076834189 endingPage "764" @default.
• W2076834189 startingPage "760" @default.
• W2076834189 abstract "Although laparoscopic splenectomy (Lap-Spleen) has become the standard surgical approach for normal-sized spleens, open splenectomy (Open-Spleen) is still recommended by many in the setting of splenomegaly. We set out to compare the impact of spleen size on Lap-Spleen and Open-Spleen outcomes using a national database.We reviewed the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who had undergone non-emergency splenectomy during 2005-2010. To evaluate the impact of spleen size on outcomes, we considered patients with diagnoses of splenomegaly and hypersplenism as those having large spleens (Large-Sp group) and those with diagnoses of primary thrombocytopenia and immune thrombocytopenic purpura as having normal spleens (Normal-Sp group). Patients were also categorized based on surgical approach into Lap-Spleen and Open-Spleen groups.We identified 639 patients in the Large-Sp group and 879 patients in the Normal-Sp group. During 2005-2010 laparoscopy was used in 84.2% of cases in the Normal-Sp group (annual range, 77.8%-90.8%). However, the rate of laparoscopy in the Large-Sp group remained consistently below 50% with an average of 41.8% (annual range, 20%-47%). In the Lap-Spleen group, those with Large-Sp had longer operative time and length of stay and higher blood transfusion and morbidity compared with the Normal-Sp group. However, when looking specifically at the Large-Sp group, patients with Open-Spleen had more transfusion requirements, longer length of stay, and higher morbidity, compared with those with Lap-Spleen.Lap-Spleen leads to significant improvement in outcomes. These advantages were believed to be limited to normal-sized spleens, but this study demonstrates that laparoscopy can still be advantageous in patients with splenomegaly. We hope such data encourages wider utilization of laparoscopy in the setting of splenomegaly, especially among surgeons who are experienced with the technique." @default.
• W2076834189 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2076834189 creator A5017887249 @default.
• W2076834189 creator A5082447758 @default.
• W2076834189 date "2013-09-01" @default.
• W2076834189 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2076834189 title "Laparoscopic Versus Open Splenectomy: The Impact of Spleen Size on Outcomes" @default.
• W2076834189 cites W1541710363 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W1994486978 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W1997136178 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2003982840 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2022308219 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2029208310 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2030028062 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2032279166 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2035908524 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2036846659 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2043196404 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2055742826 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2087853936 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2104796178 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2132430886 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2141218183 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W2147947265 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W4242886879 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W4245521241 @default.
• W2076834189 cites W68919883 @default.
• W2076834189 doi "https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2013.0012" @default.
• W2076834189 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23781954" @default.
• W2076834189 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2076834189 type Work @default.
• W2076834189 sameAs 2076834189 @default.
• W2076834189 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2076834189 countsByYear W20768341892014 @default.
• W2076834189 countsByYear W20768341892015 @default.
• W2076834189 countsByYear W20768341892016 @default.
• W2076834189 countsByYear W20768341892018 @default.
• W2076834189 countsByYear W20768341892019 @default.
• W2076834189 countsByYear W20768341892020 @default.
• W2076834189 countsByYear W20768341892021 @default.
• W2076834189 countsByYear W20768341892022 @default.
• W2076834189 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2076834189 hasAuthorship W2076834189A5017887249 @default.
• W2076834189 hasAuthorship W2076834189A5082447758 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConcept C2776309230 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConcept C2776619665 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConcept C2780931953 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConceptScore W2076834189C126322002 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConceptScore W2076834189C141071460 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConceptScore W2076834189C2776309230 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConceptScore W2076834189C2776619665 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConceptScore W2076834189C2780047204 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConceptScore W2076834189C2780931953 @default.
• W2076834189 hasConceptScore W2076834189C71924100 @default.
• W2076834189 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2076834189 hasLocation W20768341891 @default.
• W2076834189 hasLocation W20768341892 @default.
• W2076834189 hasOpenAccess W2076834189 @default.
• W2076834189 hasPrimaryLocation W20768341891 @default.
• W2076834189 hasRelatedWork W1975676508 @default.
• W2076834189 hasRelatedWork W1991768851 @default.
• W2076834189 hasRelatedWork W2109342857 @default.
• W2076834189 hasRelatedWork W2323712503 @default.
• W2076834189 hasRelatedWork W2348740206 @default.
• W2076834189 hasRelatedWork W2390961722 @default.
• W2076834189 hasRelatedWork W2470353823 @default.
• W2076834189 hasRelatedWork W2887041701 @default.
• W2076834189 hasRelatedWork W4250712756 @default.
• W2076834189 hasRelatedWork W64738951 @default.
• W2076834189 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W2076834189 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2076834189 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2076834189 magId "2076834189" @default.
• W2076834189 workType "article" @default.