FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2076890947> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2076890947 endingPage "e222" @default.
• W2076890947 startingPage "e221" @default.
• W2076890947 abstract "The rate of optimally implanted prosthesis was significantly higher with navigation than with conventional technique: the navigation system is a useful aid for these often difficult operations, where the visual information is often misleading. Revision total knee replacement (TKR) is a challenging procedure, especially because most of the standard bony and ligamentous landmarks used during primary TKR are lost due to the index implantation. However, as for primary TKR, restoration of the joint line, adequate limb axis correction and ligamentous stability are considered critical for the short- and long- term outcome of revision TKR. There is no available data about the range of tolerable leg alignment after revision TKR. However, it is logical to assume that the same range than after primary TKR might be accepted, that is ± 3° off the neutral alignment. One might also assume that the conventional instruments, which rely on visual or anatomical alignments or intra- or extra-medullary rods, are associated with significant higher variation of the leg axis correction, especially in cases with significant bone loss which prevents to control the exact location of the usual, relevant landmarks. Navigation system might address this issue. We are using an image-free system (ORTHOPILOT TM, AESCULAP, FRG) for routine implantation of primary TKR. The standard software was used for revision TKR. Registration of anatomic and cinematic data was performed with the index implant left in place. The components were then removed. New bone cuts as necessary were performed under the control of the navigation system. The size of the implants and their thickness was chosen after simulation of the residual laxities, and ligament balance was adapted to the simulation results. The system did not allow navigation for intra-medullary stem extensions and any bone filling which may have been required. This technique was used for 37 patients. The accuracy of implantation was assessed by measuring following angles on the post-operative long-leg radiographs: mechanical femoro-tibial angle (normal = 0°, varus deformation was described with a positive angle); coronal orientation of the femoral component in comparison to the mechanical femoral axis (normal = 90°, varus deformation was described with an angle < 90°); coronal orientation of the tibial component in comparison to the mechanical tibial axis (normal = 90°, varus deformation was described with an angle < 90°); sagittal orientation of the tibial component in comparison to the proximal posterior tibial cortex (normal = 90°, flexion deformation was described with angle < 90°). Individual analysis was performed as follows: one point was given for each fulfilled item, giving a maximal accuracy note of 4 points. Prosthesis implantation was considered as satisfactory when the accuracy note was 4 (all fulfilled items). The rate of globally satisfactory implanted prostheses and the rate of prostheses implanted within the desired range for each criterion were recorded. The results of the 37 navigated revision TKR were compared to 26 cases of revision TKR performed with conventional intramedullary guiding systems. We observed a significant improvement of all radiological items by navigated cases. Limb alignment was restored in 82% of the navigated cases and 74% of the conventional cases. The coronal orientation of the femoral component was acceptable in 85% of the navigated cases and 76% of the conventional cases. The coronal orientation of the tibial component was acceptable in 95% of the navigated cases and 89% of the conventional cases. The sagittal orientation of the tibial component was acceptable in 77% of the navigated cases and 66% of the conventional cases. Overall, 50% of the implants were oriented satisfactorily for the four criteria for navigated cases, and only 40% for conventional cases. The navigation system enables reaching the implantation goals for implant position in the large majority of cases, with a rate similar to that obtained for primary TKA. The rate of optimally implanted prosthesis was significantly higher with navigation than with conventional technique. The navigation system is a useful aid for these often difficult operations, where the visual information is often misleading. The navigation system used enables facilitated revision TKA." @default.
• W2076890947 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2076890947 creator A5055975656 @default.
• W2076890947 creator A5069413349 @default.
• W2076890947 date "2011-10-01" @default.
• W2076890947 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2076890947 title "Paper # 226: Navigated Total Knee Prosthesis Exchange: A Comparative Study With Conventional Technique" @default.
• W2076890947 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.226" @default.
• W2076890947 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2076890947 type Work @default.
• W2076890947 sameAs 2076890947 @default.
• W2076890947 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2076890947 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2076890947 hasAuthorship W2076890947A5055975656 @default.
• W2076890947 hasAuthorship W2076890947A5069413349 @default.
• W2076890947 hasBestOaLocation W20768909471 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C195121873 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C2777891301 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C2986595273 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C3019066406 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C105702510 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C141071460 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C154945302 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C195121873 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C2777891301 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C2778715743 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C2781411149 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C29694066 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C2986595273 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C3019066406 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C41008148 @default.
• W2076890947 hasConceptScore W2076890947C71924100 @default.
• W2076890947 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2076890947 hasLocation W20768909471 @default.
• W2076890947 hasOpenAccess W2076890947 @default.
• W2076890947 hasPrimaryLocation W20768909471 @default.
• W2076890947 hasRelatedWork W1973151250 @default.
• W2076890947 hasRelatedWork W1980062504 @default.
• W2076890947 hasRelatedWork W1991559689 @default.
• W2076890947 hasRelatedWork W2046319805 @default.
• W2076890947 hasRelatedWork W2323822740 @default.
• W2076890947 hasRelatedWork W23987770 @default.
• W2076890947 hasRelatedWork W2411286073 @default.
• W2076890947 hasRelatedWork W2419312521 @default.
• W2076890947 hasRelatedWork W37628997 @default.
• W2076890947 hasRelatedWork W4290310445 @default.
• W2076890947 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2076890947 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2076890947 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2076890947 magId "2076890947" @default.
• W2076890947 workType "article" @default.