FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2077136468> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2077136468 endingPage "747" @default.
• W2077136468 startingPage "741" @default.
• W2077136468 abstract "Background The optimal technique for removal of diminutive or small colorectal polyps is debatable. Objective To compare the complete resection rates of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for the removal of adenomatous polyps ≤7 mm. Design Prospective randomized controlled study. Setting A university hospital. Patients A total of 139 patients who were found to have ≥1 colorectal adenomatous polyps ≤7 mm. Interventions Polyps were randomized to be treated with either CSP or CFP. After the initial polypectomy, additional EMR was performed at the polypectomy site to assess the presence of residual polyp tissue. Main Outcome Measurements Absence of residual polyp tissue in the EMR specimen of the polypectomy site was defined as complete resection. Results Among a total of 145 polyps, 128 (88.3%) were adenomatous polyps. The overall complete resection rate for adenomatous polyps was significantly higher in the CSP group compared with the CFP group (57/59, 96.6% vs 57/69, 82.6%; P = .011). Although the complete resection rates for adenomatous polyps ≤4 mm were not different (27/27, 100% vs 31/32, 96.9%; P = 1.000), the complete resection rates for adenomatous polyps sized 5 to 7 mm was significantly higher in the CSP group compared with the CFP group (30/32, 93.8% vs 26/37, 70.3%; P = .013). Limitations Single-center study. Conclusion CSP is recommended for the complete resection of colorectal adenomatous polyps ≤7 mm. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01665898.) The optimal technique for removal of diminutive or small colorectal polyps is debatable. To compare the complete resection rates of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for the removal of adenomatous polyps ≤7 mm. Prospective randomized controlled study. A university hospital. A total of 139 patients who were found to have ≥1 colorectal adenomatous polyps ≤7 mm. Polyps were randomized to be treated with either CSP or CFP. After the initial polypectomy, additional EMR was performed at the polypectomy site to assess the presence of residual polyp tissue. Absence of residual polyp tissue in the EMR specimen of the polypectomy site was defined as complete resection. Among a total of 145 polyps, 128 (88.3%) were adenomatous polyps. The overall complete resection rate for adenomatous polyps was significantly higher in the CSP group compared with the CFP group (57/59, 96.6% vs 57/69, 82.6%; P = .011). Although the complete resection rates for adenomatous polyps ≤4 mm were not different (27/27, 100% vs 31/32, 96.9%; P = 1.000), the complete resection rates for adenomatous polyps sized 5 to 7 mm was significantly higher in the CSP group compared with the CFP group (30/32, 93.8% vs 26/37, 70.3%; P = .013). Single-center study. CSP is recommended for the complete resection of colorectal adenomatous polyps ≤7 mm. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01665898.)" @default.
• W2077136468 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2077136468 creator A5004291734 @default.
• W2077136468 creator A5013387594 @default.
• W2077136468 creator A5037549135 @default.
• W2077136468 creator A5049607620 @default.
• W2077136468 creator A5056239515 @default.
• W2077136468 creator A5073033478 @default.
• W2077136468 creator A5075345859 @default.
• W2077136468 creator A5081528958 @default.
• W2077136468 creator A5084473082 @default.
• W2077136468 creator A5089297438 @default.
• W2077136468 date "2015-03-01" @default.
• W2077136468 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2077136468 title "Cold snare polypectomy versus cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial" @default.
• W2077136468 cites W1969066601 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W1970262067 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W1983557376 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W1992974652 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W1995455630 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W1996350421 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2014973896 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2039037621 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2044297386 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2044848187 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2048995401 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2058305309 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2062389499 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2062575228 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2063075544 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2067684508 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2095240769 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2116817916 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2131986774 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2133693505 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2153146911 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W2315113559 @default.
• W2077136468 cites W4245021814 @default.
• W2077136468 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.048" @default.
• W2077136468 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25708763" @default.
• W2077136468 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2077136468 type Work @default.
• W2077136468 sameAs 2077136468 @default.
• W2077136468 citedByCount "147" @default.
• W2077136468 countsByYear W20771364682015 @default.
• W2077136468 countsByYear W20771364682016 @default.
• W2077136468 countsByYear W20771364682017 @default.
• W2077136468 countsByYear W20771364682018 @default.
• W2077136468 countsByYear W20771364682019 @default.
• W2077136468 countsByYear W20771364682020 @default.
• W2077136468 countsByYear W20771364682021 @default.
• W2077136468 countsByYear W20771364682022 @default.
• W2077136468 countsByYear W20771364682023 @default.
• W2077136468 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2077136468 hasAuthorship W2077136468A5004291734 @default.
• W2077136468 hasAuthorship W2077136468A5013387594 @default.
• W2077136468 hasAuthorship W2077136468A5037549135 @default.
• W2077136468 hasAuthorship W2077136468A5049607620 @default.
• W2077136468 hasAuthorship W2077136468A5056239515 @default.
• W2077136468 hasAuthorship W2077136468A5073033478 @default.
• W2077136468 hasAuthorship W2077136468A5075345859 @default.
• W2077136468 hasAuthorship W2077136468A5081528958 @default.
• W2077136468 hasAuthorship W2077136468A5084473082 @default.
• W2077136468 hasAuthorship W2077136468A5089297438 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C2776914593 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C2778866283 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C2780581329 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C2910480691 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C121608353 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C126322002 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C141071460 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C159110652 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C168563851 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C2776914593 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C2778435480 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C2778866283 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C2780581329 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C2910480691 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C526805850 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C71924100 @default.
• W2077136468 hasConceptScore W2077136468C90924648 @default.
• W2077136468 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2077136468 hasLocation W20771364681 @default.
• W2077136468 hasLocation W20771364682 @default.
• W2077136468 hasOpenAccess W2077136468 @default.
• W2077136468 hasPrimaryLocation W20771364681 @default.
• W2077136468 hasRelatedWork W2034277954 @default.
• W2077136468 hasRelatedWork W2068119582 @default.
• W2077136468 hasRelatedWork W2077136468 @default.

• next