Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2077356159> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2077356159 endingPage "390" @default.
- W2077356159 startingPage "366" @default.
- W2077356159 abstract "Mediating EmotionTechnology, Social Science, and Emotion in the Payne Fund Motion-Picture Studies Brenton J. Malin (bio) In a 1936 letter to polygraph innovator John Larson, William Marston, himself a polygraph pioneer, celebrated the possibilities of their young technology. “I am in touch with several different fields here where this type of emotion-measurement can be used—and paid for highly—commercially,” Marston begins. He continues: Am also in touch with some big backers of a gorgeous and complicated idea I have for doing this work in many lines on a big scale— I call it THE TRUTH FOUNDATION. My thought is to emphasize the sociological importance of this work—it is far bigger from this angle than anything else ever attempted in psychology. You see, we are attacking the key to moral evil in the world—deception.1 While Marston’s enthusiasm may seem extreme, it resonates with a series of social-scientific attitudes about technology that came to dominance during the 1920s and 1930s. With researchers bringing the powers of electricity to bear on a variety of subjects, many social scientists, like the population more generally, fell prey to the unbridled passion that often accompanies new technologies. Harnessing the powers of electricity, the polygraph [End Page 366] promised to uncover the truth of human emotions and in so doing attack the roots of immorality. That Marston’s comments focus on emotion in particular illustrates a further attitude dominating the social-scientific and larger culture of the 1920s and 1930s. The rise of radio, the coming of the talkies, and other technological and popular cultural developments of the period made clergy, business professionals, and academics especially interested in the emotions of the American public. While ministers worried about the corruption of morals through the base sentiments of entertainment media, public-relations specialists sought new ways to shape public sentiments for the benefit of political and economic causes. At the same time, psychologists obsessed over ways to measure and manipulate human emotions in the laboratory and elsewhere. As with Marston, these thinkers saw the moral, sociological, psychological, and commercial possibilities of tapping into individuals’ emotions. In the burgeoning area of media research, the motion-picture studies of the Payne Fund brought these technological and emotional questions together. This set of thirteen studies published in 1933 attempted to detail the effects of movies on viewers, especially children. In Our Movie-Made Children, a summary of the Payne Fund’s scientific studies meant for a more popular audience, Henry James Foreman found evidence for “the influence of motion pictures and their impersonations upon the character, conduct and behaviour of vast numbers of our nation and especially upon the more malleable and younger people.”2 Foreman, like many of his contemporaries, saw both promise and problems in the powerful technology of the motion picture, “second in importance—if second it is—only to the art of printing.”3 The Payne Fund studies sought to measure what had become a commonplace idea by using quantitative and qualitative methods to demonstrate the influence of the cinematic apparatus on the attitudes and emotions of its audiences. This essay explores the confluence of media, emotion, and technology in one particular Payne Fund study monograph: Wendell Dysinger and Christian Ruckmick’s The Emotional Responses of Children to the Motion Picture Situation.4 Like Foreman, Dysinger and Ruckmick showed special concern for the influence of the talking picture, whose “illusion of reality in the theater is so great that to most of the spectators and auditors the presentations carry with them a deep emotional tone, especially in the case of children.”5 Their study utilized equipment developed in the University of Iowa’s Department of Psychology, where Ruckmick was a professor and Dysinger a [End Page 367] graduate student. Hooking up subjects to psycho-galvanometers and pneumo-cardiographs that monitored perspiration, respiration, and heart rate, Ruckmick and Dysinger used their laboratory machinery to monitor audience members’ emotions. For Ruckmick, Dysinger, and many of their contemporaries, the technological power of such equipment promised a fitting adversary to the power of cinema; in fact, their faith in the readings of the psycho-galvanometer rested on the same belief in the..." @default.
- W2077356159 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2077356159 creator A5043068337 @default.
- W2077356159 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W2077356159 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2077356159 title "Mediating Emotion: Technology, Social Science, and Emotion in the Payne Fund Motion-Picture Studies" @default.
- W2077356159 cites W102913070 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1453570775 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1479854122 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1521410473 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1535265524 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1546500332 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1576114336 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1583409680 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1599105370 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1659142197 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W172570018 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1915928763 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1963604272 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1977927905 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1982570279 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W1988876298 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2002403161 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2008952496 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2020199440 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2023065501 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2033416868 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2042252159 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2042420117 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2044538662 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2047056295 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2051799795 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2068673535 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2074147813 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2076794330 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2078786961 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2080511810 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2080975227 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2086497190 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2089023600 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2093126661 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2095126522 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2101177233 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2112587454 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2113214903 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2118633025 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2129265232 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2130972422 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2138156647 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2156173282 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2158501370 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2165220954 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2314490167 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2314971124 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2316902474 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2317462664 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2318469048 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2319471486 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2319660516 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2321035330 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2324934382 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2324937354 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2325284321 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2326021427 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2327226142 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2328773765 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2329403606 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2334444836 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2334570878 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2417400088 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W265483581 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2737794261 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2796930413 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W2800974509 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W3033414902 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W3127583585 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W351860862 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W611636766 @default.
- W2077356159 cites W614445618 @default.
- W2077356159 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.0.0246" @default.
- W2077356159 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2077356159 type Work @default.
- W2077356159 sameAs 2077356159 @default.
- W2077356159 citedByCount "13" @default.
- W2077356159 countsByYear W20773561592013 @default.
- W2077356159 countsByYear W20773561592014 @default.
- W2077356159 countsByYear W20773561592015 @default.
- W2077356159 countsByYear W20773561592016 @default.
- W2077356159 countsByYear W20773561592017 @default.
- W2077356159 countsByYear W20773561592021 @default.
- W2077356159 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2077356159 hasAuthorship W2077356159A5043068337 @default.
- W2077356159 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
- W2077356159 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2077356159 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2077356159 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2077356159 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2077356159 hasConcept C176856949 @default.