FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2077366005> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2077366005 endingPage "269" @default.
• W2077366005 startingPage "254" @default.
• W2077366005 abstract "Objectives This study examined the relationship between patients' object relations and interpersonal process in psychotherapy. Namely, we tested the hypothesis that the quality of patients' object relations is positively associated with both patient‐ and therapist‐rated alliance quality. Design Psychotherapy was administered naturalistically, with quantitative data collection before and during treatment. Methods Participants included 73 adult outpatients and 23 therapists at two mental health clinics. Using the Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory, we measured four dimensions of patients' object relations at baseline—alienation, insecure attachment, egocentricity, and social incompetence. Using the Working Alliance Inventory, we measured alliance from patient and therapist perspectives. Control variables included time, patient demographics, symptom severity, and clinic. We employed hierarchical linear modelling to analyse data with a nested structure, with 138 sessions at Level 1, 73 patients at Level 2, and 23 therapists at Level 3. Results Patient alienation and insecure attachment were associated with lower patient‐rated alliance, while egocentricity was associated with higher patient‐rated alliance. Patients' object relations were not significantly associated with therapist‐rated alliance. On average, patients perceived the alliance more positively than their therapists, with a weak positive correlation between the alliance perspectives. Conclusions The results suggest that object relation dimensions may be important patient characteristics for forecasting therapeutic relationship quality. They also call for more attention to differences between alliance rating perspectives. Practitioner points Treatment may benefit from more attention to the quality of patients' object relations. If patients present with high levels of alienation and insecure attachment, therapists may need to pay especially close attention to the therapeutic alliance, and prudently address any ruptures in its quality. When monitoring the alliance quality, it is important to consider that patients and therapists may have different perspectives. Therapists relying solely on their own perceptions are at risk of missing alliance difficulties, and patients' object relations may be uniquely predictive of their own sense of the alliance. Therefore, it may be helpful to ask patients in session and through standardized measures for feedback on how they perceive the goals and tasks of treatment and the emotional bond with their therapist. Again, any alliance tensions could then be addressed directly as a means to maintaining engagement in the service of better outcome." @default.
• W2077366005 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2077366005 creator A5037935092 @default.
• W2077366005 creator A5039179268 @default.
• W2077366005 creator A5052465178 @default.
• W2077366005 date "2014-11-20" @default.
• W2077366005 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W2077366005 title "The relationship between patient object relations and the therapeutic alliance in a naturalistic psychotherapy sample" @default.
• W2077366005 cites W1587682423 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W1716373728 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W1973239376 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W1986104000 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W1992725455 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2002007457 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2006408379 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2007748712 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2014942076 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2033651499 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2042273921 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2044661514 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2055680289 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2065552268 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2069495743 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2085174095 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2131827385 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2134813353 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2141945830 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2157597717 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2326000812 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2416654024 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2476727158 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W2491847537 @default.
• W2077366005 cites W4255396331 @default.
• W2077366005 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12046" @default.
• W2077366005 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25409621" @default.
• W2077366005 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2077366005 type Work @default.
• W2077366005 sameAs 2077366005 @default.
• W2077366005 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2077366005 countsByYear W20773660052017 @default.
• W2077366005 countsByYear W20773660052018 @default.
• W2077366005 countsByYear W20773660052021 @default.
• W2077366005 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2077366005 hasAuthorship W2077366005A5037935092 @default.
• W2077366005 hasAuthorship W2077366005A5039179268 @default.
• W2077366005 hasAuthorship W2077366005A5052465178 @default.
• W2077366005 hasBestOaLocation W20773660052 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C171773132 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C2778431023 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C2778633572 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C2781238097 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C43450049 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConcept C80205471 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C138885662 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C15744967 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C171773132 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C17744445 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C199539241 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C2778431023 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C2778633572 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C2781238097 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C41895202 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C43450049 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C542102704 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C70410870 @default.
• W2077366005 hasConceptScore W2077366005C80205471 @default.
• W2077366005 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2077366005 hasLocation W20773660051 @default.
• W2077366005 hasLocation W20773660052 @default.
• W2077366005 hasLocation W20773660053 @default.
• W2077366005 hasOpenAccess W2077366005 @default.
• W2077366005 hasPrimaryLocation W20773660051 @default.
• W2077366005 hasRelatedWork W1501066569 @default.
• W2077366005 hasRelatedWork W2057692289 @default.
• W2077366005 hasRelatedWork W2100207701 @default.
• W2077366005 hasRelatedWork W2145168069 @default.
• W2077366005 hasRelatedWork W2289802689 @default.
• W2077366005 hasRelatedWork W2290084964 @default.
• W2077366005 hasRelatedWork W2626842421 @default.
• W2077366005 hasRelatedWork W2915212518 @default.
• W2077366005 hasRelatedWork W4237090653 @default.
• W2077366005 hasRelatedWork W955333657 @default.
• W2077366005 hasVolume "88" @default.
• W2077366005 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2077366005 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2077366005 magId "2077366005" @default.
• W2077366005 workType "article" @default.