Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2077482024> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2077482024 endingPage "427" @default.
- W2077482024 startingPage "409" @default.
- W2077482024 abstract "Rewriting the Author:A Narrative Approach to Empathy in Infinite Jest and The Pale King Toon Staes (bio) For all the extratextual information that surrounds the popular image of David Foster Wallace—the interviews and book reviews, the many commemorations—the question remains how this image affects the reception of his novels. The notion of the implied author may well be drawing heavy criticism in recent narrative theory, but research indicates that readers do infer a representation of the writer while reading, merging the information they gather from the text with the knowledge they already have about its author (Herman and Vervaeck 16). Given his often-voiced and widely quoted views on serious literature, this knowledge might be quite extensive in Wallace's case, not least because he also seems to be profiled as a writer's writer. Of the several novels published after 2008 that may or may not include sly references to Wallace, two examples are most explicit: Jonathan Lethem's Chronic City (2010) and Jeffrey Eugenides's The Marriage Plot (2011). Both Lethem and Eugenides have acknowledged and denied on various occasions that they have based key plot elements in their novels on Wallace, but perhaps more telling than the ambiguity of their answers to questions about Wallace's presence in these books is the simple fact that such questions were even asked. If we choose to believe that two acclaimed novelists did indeed fictionalize one of their colleagues, we have to wonder what reasons they could have had for doing so. Or, to put it differently, can we find something in Wallace's texts that other writers might want to communicate to the reader? One way to answer this question, I argue, is to look into the authorial persona that David Foster Wallace established for himself. The difficulties that arise when novelists repeatedly and spiritedly express their literary views in essays, interviews, and book reviews include the fact [End Page 409] that these views are not necessarily emblematic of their own fiction and the possibility that their take on literature will further determine the critical reception of their work. This essay addresses these difficulties with regard to Wallace's novels by raising questions about the relationship between author, narrator, and text: how does the author express his poetics, does that translate into his writings—with the bestseller Infinite Jest (1996) and the unfinished novel The Pale King (2011) as most interesting test cases—and which narrative strategies does Wallace use to that end? As I will clarify early on, this discussion of Wallace's novelistic poetics centers on the premise that his ideas on the moral usefulness of literature were partly modeled on the widely accepted assumption that novel reading augments the so-called empathy-altruism hypothesis, the belief that readers learn to substitute experiences of narrative empathy for shared feelings with real others (Keen vii). The Victorian Connection To be sure, the possible links between Chronic City or The Marriage Plot and the authorial persona of David Foster Wallace are relatively easy to make. Lethem's book frequently alludes to the fictional thousand-page novel Obstinate Dust by Ralph Warden Meeker, a literary sink-weight (111) that—like Wallace's Infinite Jest upon its publication—is more often talked about than read. Frustrated by the tome's inaccessibility and its sheer volume, Lethem's protagonist Chase Insteadman at one point chucks Obstinate Dust down Urban Fjord (111-12), a fifty-yard-wide crevasse along Manhattan's 191st Street constructed by the artist Laird Noteless—whose name stands in stark contrast to the 388 Notes and Errata at the end of Infinite Jest. Unlike Chronic City, Eugenides's The Marriage Plot does not single out a novel but features an actual protagonist that seems to share many characteristics with Wallace. Leonard Bankhead is a science major with a specific interest in language philosophy (45) who, like Wallace, chews tobacco and frequently wears a bandanna. While Wallace did not suffer from bipolar disorder, Leonard's affliction leads to ruminations on depression and mindfulness in The Marriage Plot similar to those throughout Wallace's work. Curiously, a recurring theme in many scenes of Chronic City or The Marriage..." @default.
- W2077482024 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2077482024 creator A5088399932 @default.
- W2077482024 date "2012-01-01" @default.
- W2077482024 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2077482024 title "Rewriting the Author: A Narrative Approach to Empathy in <i>Infinite Jest</i> and <i>The Pale King</i>" @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1500952994 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1513027169 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1514681518 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W151747499 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1517844652 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1538920984 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1554990987 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1557579472 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1568916942 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1584771591 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1595205674 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1603335974 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W181878435 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1971973185 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1990947812 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W1992043772 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W2038014947 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W2041183418 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W2044167911 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W2045970910 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W2068741783 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W2075852382 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W214521771 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W2325274344 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W256767295 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W2885912012 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W3111084353 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W578235940 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W655055578 @default.
- W2077482024 cites W2888475085 @default.
- W2077482024 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2012.0038" @default.
- W2077482024 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W2077482024 type Work @default.
- W2077482024 sameAs 2077482024 @default.
- W2077482024 citedByCount "8" @default.
- W2077482024 countsByYear W20774820242014 @default.
- W2077482024 countsByYear W20774820242015 @default.
- W2077482024 countsByYear W20774820242016 @default.
- W2077482024 countsByYear W20774820242017 @default.
- W2077482024 countsByYear W20774820242018 @default.
- W2077482024 countsByYear W20774820242020 @default.
- W2077482024 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2077482024 hasAuthorship W2077482024A5088399932 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C167651023 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C2776359362 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C2779885105 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C2780573756 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C105795698 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C111472728 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C124952713 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C138885662 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C142362112 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C15744967 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C167651023 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C17744445 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C199033989 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C199539241 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C2776359362 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C2779885105 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C2780573756 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C33923547 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C41895202 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C554936623 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C77805123 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C94625758 @default.
- W2077482024 hasConceptScore W2077482024C95457728 @default.
- W2077482024 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2077482024 hasLocation W20774820241 @default.
- W2077482024 hasOpenAccess W2077482024 @default.
- W2077482024 hasPrimaryLocation W20774820241 @default.
- W2077482024 hasRelatedWork W2359375216 @default.
- W2077482024 hasRelatedWork W2359470113 @default.
- W2077482024 hasRelatedWork W2372185401 @default.
- W2077482024 hasRelatedWork W2375966172 @default.
- W2077482024 hasRelatedWork W2379096543 @default.
- W2077482024 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2077482024 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.