FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2077518744> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2077518744 endingPage "536" @default.
• W2077518744 startingPage "533" @default.
• W2077518744 abstract "Reviewed by: Money over Mastery, Family over Freedom: Slavery in the Antebellum Upper South Frank Towers (bio) Keywords Slavery, Slave families, Upper South, Free blacks Money over Mastery, Family over Freedom: Slavery in the Antebellum Upper South. By Calvin Schermerhorn. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011. Pp. 296. Cloth, $60.00; paper, $30.00.) In this valuable study, Calvin Schermerhorn argues that slaves in the Chesapeake region put the preservation of family ties above formal freedom and relied on interpersonal networks to advance their cause. Economic modernization drove these strategies by pressuring enslaved families with the threats of sale westward and local migration for seasonal and industrial labor. [End Page 533] Money over Mastery addresses a vital question in rethinking antebellum southern history: If early republic slavery was part and parcel of modernity, how did slaves engage that process? Where earlier scholarship emphasized broad commonalities among the enslaved—the most important of which was a community imbued with the premodern values of peasant economies—more recent studies have emphasized slaves’ diversity of experience and their involvement in markets. Firmly aligned with the latter priorities, Schermerhorn argues that the enslaved used modernization opportunistically to build networks that would preserve their families. “As the modernity of slavery worked remorselessly through an intensifying market hungry for bodies and labor of slaves,” he writes, “enslaved people sought to defend blood kin from the worst aspects of the market by participating in it” (20–21). The book looks at a range of slave networks, which Schermerhorn defines rather broadly as “strategic ties and sets of exchanges” that gave access to “human and material resources as well as information” (24). White patrons were critical links in these chains of association, and their presence blurred the “axes of conflict” that ran along the lines of race, class, and legal standing. Although at a power disadvantage in negotiating with white patrons, enslaved African Americans could manipulate these relationships to “mitigate violence, improve working conditions, and establish status” (24). Ties to patrons that protected the enslaved from the worst abuses of the system also put them in conflict with other slaves. Schermerhorn tells this history through a series of individual case studies beginning with Charles Ball and with Solomon and Thamar Bayley, an enslaved couple in post-Revolutionary Maryland and Delaware who used networks of fellow slaves, racially mixed church congregations, politically connected employers, and even their own masters to battle kidnappers bent on selling them and their offspring in the slave market. The pull of family held Ball and the Bayleys in the South despite opportunities for escape. Only when kidnappers eventually succeeded in carrying off their families did they take flight. Networking strategies differed according to the varied roles created by economic modernization. Maritime workers used the mobility and occasional wages afforded by their jobs to develop long-distance networks. In the case of Moses Grandy, networking enabled him to buy his freedom and that of his family. But these networks were inherently fragile, as Wilmington tugboat hand Peter Robinson learned when he was [End Page 534] kidnapped and sold on return from a daring sojourn in the California goldfields. Enslaved domestic servants lacked the interstate mobility of watermen. In its place they used the bonds of the household to protect kin. The alliances forged sometimes involved sexual relationships with slaveholders that complicated ties to fellow slaves. For example, Corinna Hinton, the enslaved domestic partner of Richmond slave trader Silas Omohundro, helped manage his business by tending prisoners awaiting sale. Treated like a free woman, as were her children, Corinna’s actions did not constitute betrayal because “the idea of slave solidarity or a slave community born out of the shared experience of slavery was not a part of her horizon of understanding” (112). This fragmentation of slave experience is further explored in discussions of factory and railroad workers. Henry Brown, an enslaved cigar maker, used pay earned by exceeding his factory quota to lease his wife Nancy from her master and rent a house where they could live together. When owners imposed new profit-making strategies—factory work, slave leasing, and remote labor camps—the enslaved countered with new tactics, like exploiting slaveholders’ profit motive to..." @default.
• W2077518744 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2077518744 creator A5089244331 @default.
• W2077518744 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2077518744 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2077518744 title "<i>Money over Mastery, Family over Freedom: Slavery in the Antebellum Upper South</i> (review)" @default.
• W2077518744 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jer.2012.0054" @default.
• W2077518744 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2077518744 type Work @default.
• W2077518744 sameAs 2077518744 @default.
• W2077518744 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2077518744 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2077518744 hasAuthorship W2077518744A5089244331 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConcept C2778682666 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConcept C2779220025 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConcept C53844881 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConceptScore W2077518744C144024400 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConceptScore W2077518744C17744445 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConceptScore W2077518744C199539241 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConceptScore W2077518744C2778061430 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConceptScore W2077518744C2778682666 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConceptScore W2077518744C2779220025 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConceptScore W2077518744C53844881 @default.
• W2077518744 hasConceptScore W2077518744C95457728 @default.
• W2077518744 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2077518744 hasLocation W20775187441 @default.
• W2077518744 hasOpenAccess W2077518744 @default.
• W2077518744 hasPrimaryLocation W20775187441 @default.
• W2077518744 hasRelatedWork W1970858654 @default.
• W2077518744 hasRelatedWork W2208258274 @default.
• W2077518744 hasRelatedWork W2356701998 @default.
• W2077518744 hasRelatedWork W2364699952 @default.
• W2077518744 hasRelatedWork W2369066610 @default.
• W2077518744 hasRelatedWork W2369170498 @default.
• W2077518744 hasRelatedWork W2374786755 @default.
• W2077518744 hasRelatedWork W2382503961 @default.
• W2077518744 hasRelatedWork W2392122435 @default.
• W2077518744 hasRelatedWork W4297866313 @default.
• W2077518744 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W2077518744 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2077518744 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2077518744 magId "2077518744" @default.
• W2077518744 workType "article" @default.