FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2077812022> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2077812022 endingPage "1292" @default.
• W2077812022 startingPage "1284" @default.
• W2077812022 abstract "Background: Active and young individuals with glenohumeral arthritis who are treated with total glenohumeral arthroplasty are at risk for loosening or wear of the prosthetic glenoid component. This study tests the hypothesis that patients with severe glenohumeral arthritis have improvement in self-assessed shoulder comfort and function at two to four years after treatment with the combination of humeral hemiarthroplasty and concentric glenoid reaming without tissue or prosthetic component interposition. Methods: Thirty-seven consecutive patients (thirty-eight shoulders), with a mean age of fifty-seven years, who were managed by one surgeon were enrolled in this prospective study. The procedure consisted of an uncemented humeral hemiarthroplasty combined with reaming of the glenoid to a diameter 2 mm larger than that of the prosthetic humeral head. The duration of follow-up ranged from two to four years (average, 2.7 years) for thirty-five shoulders. Self-assessed comfort and function was documented with use of the Simple Shoulder Test, and radiographs were evaluated. Results: Thirty-two shoulders demonstrated improved comfort and function according to patient self-assessment, one demonstrated no change, and two had worse function following the procedure. The total number of Simple Shoulder Test functions that could be performed increased from 4.7 (of a possible 12.0) before surgery to 9.4 at the time of the final follow-up. The patients demonstrated significant improvement in ten of the twelve individual functions of the Simple Shoulder Test (p < 0.022 to p < 0.00001). With the numbers studied, gender, diagnosis, age, glenoid wear, and preoperative glenoid erosion did not significantly affect final shoulder function or overall improvement. The range of motion was significantly improved for all individuals (p < 0.00001). Radiographically, twenty-two patients had a joint space between the glenoid bone and the humeral prosthesis at the time of final follow-up. These shoulders had significantly better function than those without a preserved joint space (p < 0.017). There were no surgical complications and no revisions to total shoulder arthroplasty. Conclusions: At a minimum follow-up of two years, a selected series of patients who had humeral hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming for the treatment of glenohumeral arthritis showed significant improvement in self-assessed shoulder comfort and function. Further study, however, is needed before routine application of this procedure can be recommended. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence." @default.
• W2077812022 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2077812022 creator A5010230474 @default.
• W2077812022 creator A5015308898 @default.
• W2077812022 creator A5020096319 @default.
• W2077812022 creator A5037034774 @default.
• W2077812022 creator A5047020208 @default.
• W2077812022 creator A5050934748 @default.
• W2077812022 date "2007-06-01" @default.
• W2077812022 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2077812022 title "Self-Assessed Outcome at Two to Four Years After Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty with Concentric Glenoid Reaming" @default.
• W2077812022 cites W1637856476 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W1668026187 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W1925445634 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W1943932538 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W1965502045 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W1970237110 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W1986257102 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W1991577232 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W1997909905 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2008111290 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2014782458 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2026725400 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2031286304 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2034645142 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2051133966 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2053685028 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2064095674 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2065351236 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2074594135 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2088563829 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2093174967 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2114002711 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2128710533 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2129555416 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2139275074 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2140506059 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2148384647 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2157332953 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2158821059 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2294174557 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2415736370 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2484072695 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W2885587905 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W4249513265 @default.
• W2077812022 cites W4302434825 @default.
• W2077812022 doi "https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.e.00942" @default.
• W2077812022 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17545432" @default.
• W2077812022 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2077812022 type Work @default.
• W2077812022 sameAs 2077812022 @default.
• W2077812022 citedByCount "45" @default.
• W2077812022 countsByYear W20778120222012 @default.
• W2077812022 countsByYear W20778120222013 @default.
• W2077812022 countsByYear W20778120222015 @default.
• W2077812022 countsByYear W20778120222016 @default.
• W2077812022 countsByYear W20778120222017 @default.
• W2077812022 countsByYear W20778120222018 @default.
• W2077812022 countsByYear W20778120222019 @default.
• W2077812022 countsByYear W20778120222020 @default.
• W2077812022 countsByYear W20778120222022 @default.
• W2077812022 countsByYear W20778120222023 @default.
• W2077812022 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2077812022 hasAuthorship W2077812022A5010230474 @default.
• W2077812022 hasAuthorship W2077812022A5015308898 @default.
• W2077812022 hasAuthorship W2077812022A5020096319 @default.
• W2077812022 hasAuthorship W2077812022A5037034774 @default.
• W2077812022 hasAuthorship W2077812022A5047020208 @default.
• W2077812022 hasAuthorship W2077812022A5050934748 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C2777325788 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C2780457017 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConcept C90296322 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C141071460 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C142724271 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C204787440 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C2524010 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C2776164576 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C2777325788 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C2778336525 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C2780457017 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C29694066 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C33923547 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C36454342 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C68312169 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C71924100 @default.
• W2077812022 hasConceptScore W2077812022C90296322 @default.
• W2077812022 hasIssue "6" @default.

• next