FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2077896321> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2077896321 endingPage "133" @default.
• W2077896321 startingPage "128" @default.
• W2077896321 abstract "Evidence-based dentistry is currently a high priority in the clinical practice of orthodontics. Treatment decisions are made using evidence-based information whenever it is available to the clinician. The focus of this article is to evaluate the current literature available on the long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion. The literature was reviewed from 1979 to 2009, and all systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included in this evaluation. Clinical trials, retrospective or prospective, were also reviewed, even though they did not always meet the inclusion criteria set forth. This review of the literature shows that, based on the evidence provided by 2 trials, there is a lack of strong evidence of the long-term stability of maxillary expansion in adolescent patients with posterior crossbites at the initiation of orthodontic therapy. Factors responsible for this include high attrition rates, lack of adequate control groups, unclear diagnosis and ill-defined study end points, and lack of standardization of studies. The conclusions that can be drawn from our review are as follows: there is a clear need for well-designed and well-controlled retrospective or prospective clinical trials for the evaluation of stability of maxillary expansions. At the present time, orthodontists must accept that some treatment modalities do not yet have a high level of evidence for treatment effectiveness. Evidence-based dentistry is currently a high priority in the clinical practice of orthodontics. Treatment decisions are made using evidence-based information whenever it is available to the clinician. The focus of this article is to evaluate the current literature available on the long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion. The literature was reviewed from 1979 to 2009, and all systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included in this evaluation. Clinical trials, retrospective or prospective, were also reviewed, even though they did not always meet the inclusion criteria set forth. This review of the literature shows that, based on the evidence provided by 2 trials, there is a lack of strong evidence of the long-term stability of maxillary expansion in adolescent patients with posterior crossbites at the initiation of orthodontic therapy. Factors responsible for this include high attrition rates, lack of adequate control groups, unclear diagnosis and ill-defined study end points, and lack of standardization of studies. The conclusions that can be drawn from our review are as follows: there is a clear need for well-designed and well-controlled retrospective or prospective clinical trials for the evaluation of stability of maxillary expansions. At the present time, orthodontists must accept that some treatment modalities do not yet have a high level of evidence for treatment effectiveness." @default.
• W2077896321 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2077896321 creator A5048253665 @default.
• W2077896321 creator A5048872503 @default.
• W2077896321 date "2012-06-01" @default.
• W2077896321 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2077896321 title "Long-term Skeletal Changes with Rapid Maxillary Expansion: A Review of the Literature" @default.
• W2077896321 cites W1966668230 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W1976686729 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W1977721984 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W1992021646 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W1993668363 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2003683550 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2054000905 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2067918014 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2069142286 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2082141823 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2090061778 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2092546836 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2101145790 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2102037369 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2151973943 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2153169503 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2161462563 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2161998723 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W2162708564 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W4251447638 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W4253723705 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W4255095127 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W4293768982 @default.
• W2077896321 cites W93837268 @default.
• W2077896321 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2011.10.011" @default.
• W2077896321 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2077896321 type Work @default.
• W2077896321 sameAs 2077896321 @default.
• W2077896321 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2077896321 countsByYear W20778963212014 @default.
• W2077896321 countsByYear W20778963212017 @default.
• W2077896321 countsByYear W20778963212020 @default.
• W2077896321 countsByYear W20778963212022 @default.
• W2077896321 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2077896321 hasAuthorship W2077896321A5048253665 @default.
• W2077896321 hasAuthorship W2077896321A5048872503 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C141330323 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C2779903281 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C2780553607 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C141330323 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C142724271 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C144024400 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C17744445 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C177713679 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C19527891 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C19648533 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C199343813 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C199539241 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C204787440 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C2779473830 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C2779903281 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C2780553607 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C29694066 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C36289849 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C535046627 @default.
• W2077896321 hasConceptScore W2077896321C71924100 @default.
• W2077896321 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2077896321 hasLocation W20778963211 @default.
• W2077896321 hasOpenAccess W2077896321 @default.
• W2077896321 hasPrimaryLocation W20778963211 @default.
• W2077896321 hasRelatedWork W2094029375 @default.
• W2077896321 hasRelatedWork W2117154145 @default.
• W2077896321 hasRelatedWork W2145164408 @default.
• W2077896321 hasRelatedWork W3046755835 @default.
• W2077896321 hasRelatedWork W3128779268 @default.
• W2077896321 hasRelatedWork W3148340551 @default.
• W2077896321 hasRelatedWork W3154680269 @default.
• W2077896321 hasRelatedWork W3183290174 @default.
• W2077896321 hasRelatedWork W4307658315 @default.
• W2077896321 hasRelatedWork W1774489585 @default.
• W2077896321 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W2077896321 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2077896321 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2077896321 magId "2077896321" @default.
• W2077896321 workType "article" @default.