FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2077961291> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2077961291 endingPage "1138" @default.
• W2077961291 startingPage "1128" @default.
• W2077961291 abstract "Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic outcome of unstable distal radius fractures treated by closed reduction and sugar tong splinting and to quantitatively evaluate Lafontaines’ criteria of instability. Methods Fifty patients with 3 or more instability factors as described by Lafontaine were treated by finger trap traction, closed reduction, and sugar-tong splinting. They were evaluated radiographically for initial angulation, radial inclination, radial length, and palmar tilt at the time of injury, after reduction, and 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after reduction. The fracture either maintained an adequate reduction or failed to maintain an adequate reduction and showed secondary displacement based on specific criteria. Results At 4 weeks after reduction 46% of these unstable distal radius fractures maintained an adequate reduction. Of the 54% of fractures that failed to maintain an adequate reduction, age was the only statistically significant predictor of secondary displacement. After obtaining an acceptable initial closed reduction, patients 58 years of age were found to be at 50% risk for secondary displacement. The risk for displacement with an unacceptable radiographic result was found to increase with increasing age and decrease with decreasing age. Conclusion In the closed management of these potentially unstable distal radius fractures, age was the only statistically significant risk factor in predicting secondary displacement and instability. These data help guide treatment by closed reduction and immobilization with serial x-rays or by surgical stabilization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic outcome of unstable distal radius fractures treated by closed reduction and sugar tong splinting and to quantitatively evaluate Lafontaines’ criteria of instability. Fifty patients with 3 or more instability factors as described by Lafontaine were treated by finger trap traction, closed reduction, and sugar-tong splinting. They were evaluated radiographically for initial angulation, radial inclination, radial length, and palmar tilt at the time of injury, after reduction, and 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after reduction. The fracture either maintained an adequate reduction or failed to maintain an adequate reduction and showed secondary displacement based on specific criteria. At 4 weeks after reduction 46% of these unstable distal radius fractures maintained an adequate reduction. Of the 54% of fractures that failed to maintain an adequate reduction, age was the only statistically significant predictor of secondary displacement. After obtaining an acceptable initial closed reduction, patients 58 years of age were found to be at 50% risk for secondary displacement. The risk for displacement with an unacceptable radiographic result was found to increase with increasing age and decrease with decreasing age. In the closed management of these potentially unstable distal radius fractures, age was the only statistically significant risk factor in predicting secondary displacement and instability. These data help guide treatment by closed reduction and immobilization with serial x-rays or by surgical stabilization." @default.
• W2077961291 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2077961291 creator A5011659122 @default.
• W2077961291 creator A5060956951 @default.
• W2077961291 creator A5067448145 @default.
• W2077961291 date "2004-11-01" @default.
• W2077961291 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2077961291 title "Assessment of instability factors in adult distal radius fractures" @default.
• W2077961291 cites W104444108 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W1964505178 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2039175508 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2060894966 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2085173121 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2094185296 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2099246185 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2122767555 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2123742237 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2133173115 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2188945701 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2253449895 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2290442895 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W2470339802 @default.
• W2077961291 cites W4245535602 @default.
• W2077961291 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.06.008" @default.
• W2077961291 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15576227" @default.
• W2077961291 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2077961291 type Work @default.
• W2077961291 sameAs 2077961291 @default.
• W2077961291 citedByCount "138" @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912012 @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912013 @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912014 @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912015 @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912016 @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912017 @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912018 @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912019 @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912020 @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912021 @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912022 @default.
• W2077961291 countsByYear W20779612912023 @default.
• W2077961291 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2077961291 hasAuthorship W2077961291A5011659122 @default.
• W2077961291 hasAuthorship W2077961291A5060956951 @default.
• W2077961291 hasAuthorship W2077961291A5067448145 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C107551265 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C111335779 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C207821765 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C107551265 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C111335779 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C121332964 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C141071460 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C15744967 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C207821765 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C2524010 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C29694066 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C33923547 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C36454342 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C542102704 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C57879066 @default.
• W2077961291 hasConceptScore W2077961291C71924100 @default.
• W2077961291 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2077961291 hasLocation W20779612911 @default.
• W2077961291 hasLocation W20779612912 @default.
• W2077961291 hasOpenAccess W2077961291 @default.
• W2077961291 hasPrimaryLocation W20779612911 @default.
• W2077961291 hasRelatedWork W119667337 @default.
• W2077961291 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W2077961291 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2077961291 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2077961291 hasRelatedWork W2052636161 @default.
• W2077961291 hasRelatedWork W2115425335 @default.
• W2077961291 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2077961291 hasRelatedWork W2330701812 @default.
• W2077961291 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2077961291 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2077961291 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W2077961291 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2077961291 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2077961291 magId "2077961291" @default.
• W2077961291 workType "article" @default.