Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078119224> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2078119224 endingPage "339" @default.
- W2078119224 startingPage "327" @default.
- W2078119224 abstract "Introduction:What Is Reenactment? Vanessa Agnew As anyone who has swabbed decks and gone aloft knows, reenactment is fun. It indulges the twin passions of work and play, which are generally divorced from each other. It licenses dressing up, pretending and improvising, casting oneself as the protagonist of one's own research, and getting others to play along. Of course, it also calls for discomfort and enforced self-growth. But, like the cold nose atop the counterpane, which Melville says measures the warmth of the bed, the pain only sharpens the pleasure.1 Iain McCalman's piece in this issue, The Little Ship of Horrors, shows that suffering also makes for a better story. Perhaps because of this winning combination of imaginative play, self-improvement, intellectual enrichment, and sociality, reenactment is booming. History enthusiasts gather weekly to enact past events, television history programs are aired to good ratings, living museums hire costumed performers, civic governments sponsor local performances on historical themes, tourists follow in the steps of earlier travelers, and academics venture into public history. Reenactment thus spans diverse history-themed genres—from theatrical and living history performances to museum exhibits, television, film, travelogues, and historiography. While there are important differences between these genres and their respective practitioners, they are linked by common methodologies, modes of representation, and choice of subject matter. They are also linked by their combined use of different medial forms and the breakdown of traditionally distinct categories such as academic historian and television personality, weekend reenactor and historical adviser.2 In its appropriation of the past, this populist phenomenon favors high-concept themes—Vikings, medieval knights, pyramid builders, pirates and mutineers, cowboys and Indians, explorers, slaves, pilgrims, and soldiers. Reenactment now includes less gaudy subjects, such as the 1984 South Yorkshire miners' strike, yet the phenomenon remains overwhelmingly committed to themes that are the perennial favorites of grade-school history. The thrall of reenactment cannot be attributed merely to an interest in colorful, familiar history. Rather, its excursions are justified on political grounds; it is argued that history from below provides an important public service and gives voice to [End Page 327] hitherto marginalized positions as well as economic ones—gore, adventure, and personal transformation sell. Passion plays and pageants remind us that in the broadest sense of the term, reenactment is not new. The recent spate of reality-type reenactment programs like 1900 House, Regency House, and The Ship has precedents in docudramas such as the PBS production An American Family (1973) and MTV's Real World, launched during the early 1990s.3 Alexander Cook and Katie King, contributing to this volume, point out that such programs also share structural affinities with observational film and hence often have an experimental character. While reenactment seems endemic in the United States as well as Britain and other Commonwealth countries—a cultural phenomenon whose link to the individualist, Protestant traditions of these countries bears closer scrutiny—it is not the exclusive preserve of the Anglophone world. Reenactments of the German colonial past in Namibia and the Afrikaner legacy in South Africa, fictional American Indians in Germany, and medieval crusaders in Australia point to the fact that reenactment is a global phenomenon not necessarily confined to autochthonous historical events nor even to factual ones.4 Reenactment often verges close to fantasy role-playing in its elastic appropriation of both the real and imagined past.5 Indeed, there is a general discrepancy between the mandate of reenactment—bringing the people to history—and those same people's dislocation from the reenacted past. As historian Stephen Gapps fruitfully asks, Why would Australians [or anyone else] want to reenact overseas history so remote from their own experience?6 This anomaly suggests that reenactment performs political and cultural work that is quite distinct from more conventional forms of historiography. Even while reenactment claims to give voice to marginalized positions, those subject positions do not necessarily correlate to reenactment's constituency in the present; postcolonials might, for example, reenact the colonial past (as colonial masters or subjects) but might just as readily choose an entirely unrelated theme such as World War II or the Dark Ages. The substitutive character of reenactment themes suggests that..." @default.
- W2078119224 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2078119224 creator A5046174545 @default.
- W2078119224 date "2004-01-01" @default.
- W2078119224 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
- W2078119224 title "Introduction: What Is Reenactment?" @default.
- W2078119224 cites W1526389756 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W1570840075 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W1581648431 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W181509281 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W1971707653 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W1998413792 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W2000804391 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W2007249831 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W2012780268 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W2041406586 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W2070556678 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W2105387498 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W2125790407 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W2168824535 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W2524663955 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W3180883663 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W592232157 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W632052726 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W634106376 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W640901531 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W642529864 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W644373119 @default.
- W2078119224 cites W647492686 @default.
- W2078119224 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2005.0001" @default.
- W2078119224 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W2078119224 type Work @default.
- W2078119224 sameAs 2078119224 @default.
- W2078119224 citedByCount "126" @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242012 @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242013 @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242014 @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242015 @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242016 @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242017 @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242018 @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242019 @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242020 @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242021 @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242022 @default.
- W2078119224 countsByYear W20781192242023 @default.
- W2078119224 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2078119224 hasAuthorship W2078119224A5046174545 @default.
- W2078119224 hasBestOaLocation W20781192242 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C2776347870 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C2776359362 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C2779742141 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C29598333 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C107038049 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C124952713 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C142362112 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C144024400 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C153349607 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C166957645 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C17744445 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C199539241 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C2776347870 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C2776359362 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C2779742141 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C29595303 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C29598333 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C94625758 @default.
- W2078119224 hasConceptScore W2078119224C95457728 @default.
- W2078119224 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2078119224 hasLocation W20781192241 @default.
- W2078119224 hasLocation W20781192242 @default.
- W2078119224 hasOpenAccess W2078119224 @default.
- W2078119224 hasPrimaryLocation W20781192241 @default.
- W2078119224 hasRelatedWork W2056144494 @default.
- W2078119224 hasRelatedWork W2497496668 @default.
- W2078119224 hasRelatedWork W2746257041 @default.
- W2078119224 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2078119224 hasRelatedWork W2796398748 @default.
- W2078119224 hasRelatedWork W2888684510 @default.
- W2078119224 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2078119224 hasRelatedWork W2923372245 @default.
- W2078119224 hasRelatedWork W3159397780 @default.
- W2078119224 hasRelatedWork W4237908336 @default.
- W2078119224 hasVolume "46" @default.
- W2078119224 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2078119224 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2078119224 magId "2078119224" @default.