Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078160917> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 items per page.
- W2078160917 endingPage "223" @default.
- W2078160917 startingPage "217" @default.
- W2078160917 abstract "The purpose of this study was to provide an integrative, quantitative review of the research that has attempted to make clear the mechanisms most responsible for changes in functional capacity (FC) in patients. The meta-analytic technique proposed by Glass (1978) was used to quantify the data of numerous studies located via computer-generated citations. Many investigators have documented that improvements in FC are largely the result of complex adaptations in skeletal muscle which reflect multiple anatomic, biochemical, and hormonal alterations. Yet some investigators (Ehsani et al., 1981, 1982, 1986; Hagberg et al., 1983) have claimed that concomitant with peripheral adaptations, changes in FC via central or cardiac mechanisms (i.e., myocardial contractility, perfusion, ejection fraction, and stroke volume) are possible with prolonged, sufficiently intense training regimens. A total of 22 effect sizes (ES) were produced from 20 studies which contained the data necessary for ES computation. The ES for studies in support of cardiac adaptations (n = 10) was 3.3 ± 1.9, while the ES for studies documenting peripheral mechanisms (n = 10) was 3.2 ± 1.6. This statistically nonsignificant finding indicates that FC may be similarly altered by either mechanism. However, those studies indicating adaptations via central changes used significantly more intense training programs (80% of VO2 max vs 73.5% of VO2 max, P < 0.05). This finding corroborates the results of Ehsani and others who isolated intensity as the critical component of the exercise prescription. In further support of this finding, differences in frequency (4.1 days/week vs 3.2 days/week), duration (39.6 min. vs 43.3), and mode of exercise (walk/jog 3.3 vs all other forms 3.1) were not significant in any of the studies. Additional analysis revealed that neither the length of the program (6 month = 3.7 vs 12 month = 3.2) nor the type of patient studied (coronary artery disease [CAD] 3.8 vs documented myocardial infarcation [MI] 2.9) accounted for any differences in the type of adaptation identified. As a result of this meta-analysis, it is suggested that investigations that stratify patients according to degree of CAD, location and extent of MI, and that compare interval vs continuous training are needed to further explain how and why various adaptations occur." @default.
- W2078160917 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2078160917 creator A5006157773 @default.
- W2078160917 creator A5012779147 @default.
- W2078160917 creator A5080613135 @default.
- W2078160917 date "1990-06-01" @default.
- W2078160917 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2078160917 title "Central Versus Peripheral Adaptations for the Enhancement of Functional Capacity in Cardiac Patients" @default.
- W2078160917 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-199006000-00003" @default.
- W2078160917 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
- W2078160917 type Work @default.
- W2078160917 sameAs 2078160917 @default.
- W2078160917 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2078160917 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2078160917 hasAuthorship W2078160917A5006157773 @default.
- W2078160917 hasAuthorship W2078160917A5012779147 @default.
- W2078160917 hasAuthorship W2078160917A5080613135 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConcept C146957229 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConcept C2778198053 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConcept C2779959927 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConcept C39133596 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConcept C46762472 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConcept C78085059 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConcept C80461066 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConceptScore W2078160917C126322002 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConceptScore W2078160917C146957229 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConceptScore W2078160917C164705383 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConceptScore W2078160917C2778198053 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConceptScore W2078160917C2779959927 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConceptScore W2078160917C39133596 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConceptScore W2078160917C46762472 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConceptScore W2078160917C71924100 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConceptScore W2078160917C78085059 @default.
- W2078160917 hasConceptScore W2078160917C80461066 @default.
- W2078160917 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W2078160917 hasLocation W20781609171 @default.
- W2078160917 hasOpenAccess W2078160917 @default.
- W2078160917 hasPrimaryLocation W20781609171 @default.
- W2078160917 hasRelatedWork W2000678988 @default.
- W2078160917 hasRelatedWork W2007508623 @default.
- W2078160917 hasRelatedWork W2032838055 @default.
- W2078160917 hasRelatedWork W2095656058 @default.
- W2078160917 hasRelatedWork W2125475966 @default.
- W2078160917 hasRelatedWork W2127230228 @default.
- W2078160917 hasRelatedWork W2293227534 @default.
- W2078160917 hasRelatedWork W2409482985 @default.
- W2078160917 hasRelatedWork W4206449669 @default.
- W2078160917 hasRelatedWork W4285331589 @default.
- W2078160917 hasVolume "10" @default.
- W2078160917 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2078160917 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2078160917 magId "2078160917" @default.
- W2078160917 workType "article" @default.