FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078268093> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2078268093 endingPage "210" @default.
• W2078268093 startingPage "200" @default.
• W2078268093 abstract "Purpose The purpose of present study is to examine the influence of impression management (IM) tactics (e.g. ingratiation) applied in job application letters on perceived qualifications and hiring recommendations. The study aims to build on recent research done in the interview context, by studying IM specifically in the written form pertaining to a job application. Design/methodology/approach Data were gathered from 94 respondents asked to evaluate the job application letters of applicants for a mentoring program. IM was manipulated through the cover letter, such that, each subject received five cover letters, four of which engaged in ingratiation and one that had no ingratiation. Participants were required to evaluate the applicants' qualifications and make selection decisions. Findings The results of the study were consistent with those of the interview context. More specifically, ingratiation led to significantly higher ratings of applicants, and self‐focused tactics were more effective than other‐focused tactics. Research limitations/implications The findings of this research conveyed that most of the IM tactics significantly improve recruiters' evaluations of the applicants. Still, future research needs to further investigate this relationship in order to understand the specific nature of the IM tactics and develop a deeper understanding of the underlying processes that cause IM tactics to have an impact on recruiters' judgments. Practical implications The present study highlights the need for greater understanding of how IM tactics may influence the decisions of employers who rely on written applications, or a combination of job application letters and interviews. Therefore, employers need to be aware of the use of IM in written applications and emphasize the importance of interviews in the selection process. Originality/value Existing research has been concerned with how IM tactics influence interview outcomes and has overlooked how these same IM tactics may be used in job application letters to influence selection decisions. This study addresses this gap by focusing on the job application letter as a means of conveying and managing impressions by candidates." @default.
• W2078268093 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2078268093 creator A5005292478 @default.
• W2078268093 creator A5025847275 @default.
• W2078268093 creator A5029526917 @default.
• W2078268093 date "2006-04-01" @default.
• W2078268093 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2078268093 title "Ingratiation in job applications: impact on selection decisions" @default.
• W2078268093 cites W1975402801 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W1983511332 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W1989276076 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W1991040117 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2004524956 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2011799942 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2038934515 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2042034888 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2049060411 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2060040725 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2076576471 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2081026047 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2082927059 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2093656843 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2110158827 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2167018197 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W2481967652 @default.
• W2078268093 cites W4246637887 @default.
• W2078268093 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610659551" @default.
• W2078268093 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2078268093 type Work @default.
• W2078268093 sameAs 2078268093 @default.
• W2078268093 citedByCount "42" @default.
• W2078268093 countsByYear W20782680932013 @default.
• W2078268093 countsByYear W20782680932014 @default.
• W2078268093 countsByYear W20782680932015 @default.
• W2078268093 countsByYear W20782680932016 @default.
• W2078268093 countsByYear W20782680932017 @default.
• W2078268093 countsByYear W20782680932018 @default.
• W2078268093 countsByYear W20782680932019 @default.
• W2078268093 countsByYear W20782680932021 @default.
• W2078268093 countsByYear W20782680932022 @default.
• W2078268093 countsByYear W20782680932023 @default.
• W2078268093 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2078268093 hasAuthorship W2078268093A5005292478 @default.
• W2078268093 hasAuthorship W2078268093A5025847275 @default.
• W2078268093 hasAuthorship W2078268093A5029526917 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C174954385 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C2718322 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C2777207495 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C4994750 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C58346731 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C81917197 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C10138342 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C151730666 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C154945302 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C15744967 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C162324750 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C174954385 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C182306322 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C187736073 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C2718322 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C2777207495 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C2779343474 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C41008148 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C4994750 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C58346731 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C75630572 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C77805123 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C81917197 @default.
• W2078268093 hasConceptScore W2078268093C86803240 @default.
• W2078268093 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2078268093 hasLocation W20782680931 @default.
• W2078268093 hasOpenAccess W2078268093 @default.
• W2078268093 hasPrimaryLocation W20782680931 @default.
• W2078268093 hasRelatedWork W174237868 @default.
• W2078268093 hasRelatedWork W1963872832 @default.
• W2078268093 hasRelatedWork W2006795475 @default.
• W2078268093 hasRelatedWork W2015358251 @default.
• W2078268093 hasRelatedWork W2025685535 @default.
• W2078268093 hasRelatedWork W2058818389 @default.
• W2078268093 hasRelatedWork W2078268093 @default.
• W2078268093 hasRelatedWork W2781602828 @default.
• W2078268093 hasRelatedWork W3090674051 @default.
• W2078268093 hasRelatedWork W47395661 @default.
• W2078268093 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W2078268093 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2078268093 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next