FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078392705> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2078392705 endingPage "7828" @default.
• W2078392705 startingPage "7823" @default.
• W2078392705 abstract "The cytosol of mammalian cells is a crowded environment containing soluble proteins and a network of cytoskeletal filaments. Gene delivery by synthetic vectors involves the endocytosis of DNA-polycation complexes, escape from endosomes, and diffusion of non-complexed DNA through the cytosol to reach the nucleus. We found previously that the translational diffusion of large DNAs (>250 bp) in cytoplasm was greatly slowed compared with that of smaller DNAs (Lukacs, G. L., Haggie, P., Seksek, O., Lechardeur, D., Freedman, N., and Verkman, A. S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 1625–1629). To determine the mechanisms responsible for size-dependent DNA diffusion, we used fluorescence correlation spectroscopy to measure the diffusion of single fluorophore-labeled DNAs in crowded solutions, cytosol extracts, actin network, and living cells. DNA diffusion (D) in solutions made crowded with Ficoll-70 (up to 40 weight percentage) or soluble cytosol extracts (up to 100 mg/ml) relative to diffusion of the same sized DNAs in saline (D/Do) was approximately independent of DNA size (20–4500 bp), quite different from the strong reduction in D/Do in the cytoplasm of living cells. However, the reduced D/Do with increasing DNA size was closely reproduced in solutions containing cross-linked actin filaments assembled with gelsolin, whereas soluble macromolecules of the same size and concentration did not reduce D/Do. In intact cells microinjected with fluorescent DNAs and studied by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy or photobleaching methods, D/Do was reduced by 5–150-fold (20–6000 bp); however, the size-dependent reduction in D/Do was abolished after actin cytoskeleton disruption. Our results identify the actin cytoskeleton as a major barrier restricting cytoplasmic transport of non-complexed DNA in non-viral gene transfer. The cytosol of mammalian cells is a crowded environment containing soluble proteins and a network of cytoskeletal filaments. Gene delivery by synthetic vectors involves the endocytosis of DNA-polycation complexes, escape from endosomes, and diffusion of non-complexed DNA through the cytosol to reach the nucleus. We found previously that the translational diffusion of large DNAs (>250 bp) in cytoplasm was greatly slowed compared with that of smaller DNAs (Lukacs, G. L., Haggie, P., Seksek, O., Lechardeur, D., Freedman, N., and Verkman, A. S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 1625–1629). To determine the mechanisms responsible for size-dependent DNA diffusion, we used fluorescence correlation spectroscopy to measure the diffusion of single fluorophore-labeled DNAs in crowded solutions, cytosol extracts, actin network, and living cells. DNA diffusion (D) in solutions made crowded with Ficoll-70 (up to 40 weight percentage) or soluble cytosol extracts (up to 100 mg/ml) relative to diffusion of the same sized DNAs in saline (D/Do) was approximately independent of DNA size (20–4500 bp), quite different from the strong reduction in D/Do in the cytoplasm of living cells. However, the reduced D/Do with increasing DNA size was closely reproduced in solutions containing cross-linked actin filaments assembled with gelsolin, whereas soluble macromolecules of the same size and concentration did not reduce D/Do. In intact cells microinjected with fluorescent DNAs and studied by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy or photobleaching methods, D/Do was reduced by 5–150-fold (20–6000 bp); however, the size-dependent reduction in D/Do was abolished after actin cytoskeleton disruption. Our results identify the actin cytoskeleton as a major barrier restricting cytoplasmic transport of non-complexed DNA in non-viral gene transfer. Gene delivery by non-viral vectors is a complex and inefficient process that involves cellular internalization by endocytosis, escape from endosomes, DNA-polycation dissociation, and diffusion of non-complexed DNA in the cytoplasm to reach the nucleus (1Zuber G. Dauty E. Nothisen M. Belguise P. Behr J.P. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001; 52: 245-253Crossref PubMed Scopus (201) Google Scholar, 2Zabner J. Fasbender A.J. Moninger T. Poellinger K.A. Welsh M.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 18997-19007Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1309) Google Scholar, 3Xu Y. Szoka Jr., F.C. Biochemistry. 1996; 35: 5616-5623Crossref PubMed Scopus (1072) Google Scholar). DNA diffusion in the cytoplasm and nuclear import are believed to be rate-limiting determinants of transgene delivery, extending the time that non-complexed DNA is exposed to cytosolic DNases. Remarkably, <0.1% of DNA microinjected into the cytosol is ultimately expressed (4Dowty M.E. Williams P. Zhang G. Hagstrom J.E. Wolff J.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995; 92: 4572-4576Crossref PubMed Scopus (251) Google Scholar, 5Pollard H. Remy J.S. Loussouarn G. Demolombe S. Behr J.P. Escande D. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 7507-7511Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (643) Google Scholar). We measured previously the mobility of differently sized DNAs in cytoplasm by photobleaching cells after microinjection with fluorescently labeled DNAs (6Lukacs G.L. Haggie P. Seksek O. Lechardeur D. Freedman N. Verkman A.S. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 1625-1629Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (628) Google Scholar). The principal finding was that DNA diffusion in cytoplasm (Dcyto) was modestly slowed compared with that in saline (Do) (Dcyto/Do ∼ 0.2) for small DNA fragments of <250 bp but was greatly reduced (Dcyto/Do < 0.05) for larger DNAs of >250 bp such as plasmid-sized DNAs. In contrast, the diffusion of dextrans and Ficolls, which are considered to be non-interacting macromolecules, was only mildly dependent on their size up to 500–1000 kDa (7Seksek O. Biwersi J. Verkman A.S. J. Cell Biol. 1997; 138: 131-142Crossref PubMed Scopus (423) Google Scholar), which is equivalent in molecular mass to a 750–1500-bp DNA fragment. Identification of the mechanism of reduced mobility of large DNAs in cytoplasm has important consequences regarding intrinsic limitations of non-viral gene delivery and in developing strategies to improve its efficacy. Several factors can in principle reduce the diffusion of a solute in cytoplasm versus saline, including fluid phase viscosity, binding, and crowding by mobile and immobile macromolecules (8Verkman A.S. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002; 27: 27-33Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (464) Google Scholar). Systematic analysis of the diffusion of a small fluorescein-like molecule in cytoplasm indicated that reduced diffusion in cytoplasm (Dcyto/Do ∼ 0.25) resulted mainly from macromolecular crowding by the relatively high concentration of proteins in cytoplasm of ∼100–150 mg/ml (reviewed in Refs. 9Ellis R.J. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2001; 26: 597-604Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1752) Google Scholar and 10Ellis R.J. Minton A.P. Nature. 2003; 425: 27-28Crossref PubMed Scopus (696) Google Scholar). Fluid phase viscosity, defined as the effective viscosity sensed by a small molecule that does not undergo binding or other macromolecular interactions, has little influence on cytoplasmic diffusion (11Fushimi K. Verkman A.S. J. Cell Biol. 1991; 112: 719-725Crossref PubMed Scopus (200) Google Scholar, 12Luby-Phelps K. Mujumdar S. Mujumdar R.B. Ernst L.A. Galbraith W. Waggoner A.S. Biophys. J. 1993; 65: 236-242Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (187) Google Scholar). Binding can greatly reduce apparent diffusion, as was found for some enzymes that assemble into macromolecular complexes (13Haggie P.M. Verkman A.S. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 40782-40788Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar). As a densely charged polyanion, DNA binding to cytoplasmic components could be an important factor in reducing its diffusion in cytoplasm as was found in the nucleus, where DNA is nearly immobile probably because of binding to positively charged histones (6Lukacs G.L. Haggie P. Seksek O. Lechardeur D. Freedman N. Verkman A.S. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 1625-1629Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (628) Google Scholar, 14Bradbury E.M. BioEssays. 1992; 14: 9-16Crossref PubMed Scopus (347) Google Scholar). DNA diffusion in heterogeneous polydisperse media is further complicated by conformation effects resulting in persistence length and other size-dependent phenomena. Although theoretical descriptions exist in the polymer field for DNA conformational mechanics and electric field-dependent convection in gels (15De Gennes P.G. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY1979Google Scholar), the basis of the strong size dependence of DNA diffusion in cytoplasm is not clear on theoretical grounds. The purpose of this investigation was to establish the mechanism of the reduced diffusion of DNA in cytoplasm with increasing DNA size. Several possibilities were considered, including DNA binding to cytosolic components, molecular crowding by mobile obstacles, and restricted diffusion due to fixed structures. We used fluorescence correlation spectroscopy of DNAs labeled with a single fluorescent probe to measure DNA mobility at the single molecule level in crowded solutions and living cells, as well as photobleaching recovery of multiply labeled DNAs in cells. Based on a series of in vitro and cell measurements, we conclude that macromolecular crowding by fixed obstacles, mainly the actin cytoskeleton, is the principal determinant of the size-dependent slowing of DNA diffusion in cytoplasm. Our results have important implications regarding limitations in gene transfer using non-viral vectors. Fluorescently Labeled DNAs—Linear double-stranded DNAs of different sizes containing a single rhodamine green molecule were generated by PCR using pcDNA 3.1 as the template. DNAs in sizes of 100, 250, 500, 1000, 3000, and 4500 bp were generated by using a common 5′-end rhodamine green-labeled primer (5′-ATCGCTATTACCATGGTGATGCGGTTTTGG-3′) and specific 3′-end primers for each size. The amplified single fluorophore-labeled DNAs were purified by ethanol precipitation and gel filtration and concentrated on Centricon 30 or 100 filters. Rhodamine green-labeled dextrans were prepared as described previously (16Dauty E. Verkman A.S. J. Mol. Recognit. 2004; 17: 441-447Crossref PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar). The 20-mer (5′-TATTATCTAGACTCGAGTTA-3′) and the 50-mer (5′-AAATTGATGCGACAGTCAGACCCAGTGTATTAAATATAACAATAGTAATT-3′) primers containing a 5′-end rhodamine green label were synthesized by Invitrogen along with unlabeled complementary sequences for annealing to give double-stranded DNA. For photobleaching experiments, DNAs were fluorescently labeled with the bis-intercalating dye YOYO®-3 (Molecular Probes). One YOYO®-3 molecule per 100 bp DNA was found to be optimal for photobleaching studies. In Vitro Sample Preparation—Labeled DNAs and dextrans (10 kDa and 500 kDa) were dissolved at concentrations of 1–100 nm in PBS containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin. In some experiments, the solutions contained Ficoll-70 (0–40 weight percentage), cytosol (0–100 mg/ml), actin (0–8 mg/ml), or actin/gelsolin (actin 8 mg/ml; gelsolin 0.04 mg/ml). Cytosol was prepared from mouse liver. After perfusion, livers were homogenized in buffer containing 320 mm sucrose, 2 mm MgCl2, 1 mm dithiothreitol, 20 mm Hepes (pH 7.4), and several protease inhibitors (2 μg/ml pepstatin, leupeptin, aprotinin, and 50 μm Pefabloc®). The homogenate was centrifuged at 10000 × g for 30 min, and the supernatant was centrifuged at 100000 × g for 1 h to separate membranes from the cytosol. All steps were done at 4 °C. Protein concentration was assayed with a BCA protein assay kit (Bio-Rad) using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Cytosol was frozen and stored at –80 °C in the presence of 2 mm EDTA until use (17Pollard H. Toumaniantz G. Amos J.L. Avet-Loiseau H. Guihard G. Behr J.P. Escande D. J. Gene Med. 2001; 3: 153-164Crossref PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar). Cytosol at 100 mg/ml was obtained from 60 mg/ml cytosol by evaporation. For actin-containing solutions, lyophilized rabbit skeletal muscle G-actin protein (Cytoskeleton, Denver, CO) (in 5 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8, 0.2 mm sodium ATP, 0.2 mm CaCl2, 5% sucrose, and 1% dextran) was mixed with DNAs in a total volume of 10 μl in a plastic tube. For actin/gelsolin-containing solutions, G-actin protein (in stock buffer) was mixed with lyophilized human plasma gelsolin (Cytoskeleton, Denver, CO) in 25 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mm EGTA, and 50 mm NaCl at a molar ratio of 400:1. Polymerization was initiated by adding KCl to 50 mm, MgCl2 to 2 mm, and ATP to 1 mm using a small volume of a concentrated stock solution, and the sample was mixed using a micropipette and allowed to stand for 20 min. For fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) 1The abbreviations used are: FCS, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy; D, DNA diffusion coefficient; Dcyto, D in cytoplasm; Do, D in saline. measurements, 5 μl of solutions were sandwiched between two glass coverslips and transferred to the microscope stage. Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy—FCS measurements were performed on a Nikon TE-200 inverted epifluorescence microscope equipped with laser diode excitation source (488 nm, 20 milliwatt; Coherent Inc.), neutral density filter wheel, 100× oil objective (Nikon S Fluor, NA 1.3), 510-nm dichroic mirror, and 535 ± 25 bandpass emission filter (Chroma). Fluorescence was collected by a 100-μm-diameter fiberoptic patch cord mounted on a three-axis micropositioner and detected by an avalanche photodiode (<50 counts per minute of dark noise; PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Photon counts were correlated online using an ALV-5000 correlator card. Data recording times were 30–1500 s. Autocorrelation functions, G(τ), were binned and displayed on a quasi-logarithmic time scale. Correlation times, τc, were computed from G(τ) (18Rigler R. Mets U. Widengren J. Kask P. Eur. Biophys. J. 1993; 22: 169-175Crossref Scopus (879) Google Scholar) as shown in Equation 1,[G(τ)=N−1⋅[1+(τ/τc)]−1⋅[1+(τ/(κ2⋅τc))]−0.5(Eq. 1) where N is fluorophore number density in the detection volume, τ is time, and τc is the characteristic diffusion time for an ellipsoidal excitation volume (τc = z20/4D), and κ (set to 16) is the ratio of axial (zo) and equatorial (wo) radii of the focal volume. Diffusion coefficients were determined from fitted τc using a rhodamine green solution as standard (diffusion coefficient of 2.8 × 10–6 cm2/s; Ref. 18Rigler R. Mets U. Widengren J. Kask P. Eur. Biophys. J. 1993; 22: 169-175Crossref Scopus (879) Google Scholar). Generally, data from 10–40 individual G(τ) curves were averaged. Measurements were done at 23 °C in a temperature-controlled darkroom on a vibration isolation table. Photobleaching Experiments—Spot photobleaching measurements were carried out on an apparatus consisting of an argon ion laser (488 nm; Coherent Inc.), a high contrast acousto-optic modulator, and an inverted epifluorescence microscope (Diaphot, Nikon) equipped with an objective lens (20× dry, numerical aperture 0.75, or 60× oil immersion, numerical aperture 1.4; Nikon) and a 510-nm dichroic mirror (13Haggie P.M. Verkman A.S. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 40782-40788Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar). Emitted fluorescence was filtered by serial interference (530 ± 15 nm) and cut-on (>515 nm) filters and detected by a gated photomultiplier and 14-bit analog-to-digital converter. For most experiments, the laser beam power was set to 50–100 milliwatts, and the attenuation ratio (the ratio of bleach to probe beam intensity) was ∼5000 to give <30% bleach. Data from 10–15 individual recovery curves were averaged, each obtained from a different spot. Diffusion coefficients (in cm2/s) were determined from t½ values derived by non-linear regression (13Haggie P.M. Verkman A.S. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 40782-40788Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar) using a fluorescein solution as standard (diffusion coefficient of 2.8 × 10–6 cm2/s; Ref. 18Rigler R. Mets U. Widengren J. Kask P. Eur. Biophys. J. 1993; 22: 169-175Crossref Scopus (879) Google Scholar). Cell Culture and Microinjection—HeLa cells were cultured in modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 2 mm glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Solutions for microinjection consisted of calcium-free PBS containing 0.5–1 μg/μl rhodamine green-labeled DNA. Solutions were centrifuged (14000 × g for 10 min) to remove particulate matter. Microinjection was performed using an Eppendorf 5170 micromanipulator and 5242 microinjector. Glass needles were drawn from thin-walled filament capillaries (FHC, Brunswick, ME) with a vertical needle puller (Kopf, Tujunga, CA). Cells grown on 18-mm-diameter round glass coverslips were microinjected (generally ∼200 cells injected on each coverglass) at an injection pressure of 120 kilopascals over 1 s. Cell Experiments—In some experiments, the actin cytoskeleton was disrupted using cytochalasin D (5 μm) or latrunculin B (10 μm) added 15 min prior to and during experiments. For actin staining, cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and stained with rhodamine phalloidin. Confocal fluorescence images were acquired using a Leitz upright fluorescence microscope equipped with a coaxial-confocal attachment and a 100× objective. Characterization of DNA Fragments Containing a Single Fluorescent Label—Linear double-stranded DNAs containing a single fluorescent label were prepared by PCR using a 5′-rhodamine green labeled primer and different 3′-end primers to amplify DNAs of specified sizes (Fig. 1A). The size, integrity, and purity of the linear DNAs after purification were confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining and by rhodamine green fluorescence (Fig. 1B). The rhodamine green chromophore was used as a fluorescent probe for FCS measurements because of its photostability and absence of significant photophysical phenomena (such as triplet state relaxation and flicker) under the conditions of our experiments and its suitable excitation spectrum for diode laser excitation. Diffusion coefficients of the rhodamine green-labeled DNAs were measured by FCS. Representative normalized autocorrelation curves, G(τ)/G(0), are shown in Fig. 1C. Data for all DNAs fitted well to the model in Equation 1 containing a single correlation time, τc (residence time in the illuminated region), indicating simple (non-anomalous) diffusion. Correlation times increased with DNA molecular size, with τc increasing from 0.7 ± 0.1 ms (mean ± S.D.) for 20-bp DNA to 28 ± 5 ms for 4.5-kb DNA. Control experiments were done for each DNA to confirm the validity of τc values, including showing independence of τc on 4-fold changes in illumination intensity and concentration and the absence of photobleaching over the duration of data acquisition. Fig. 1D summarizes deduced translational diffusion coefficients as a function of DNA molecular size on a log-log plot with an empirical linear fit, Do = 6.5 × 10–6 cm2/s· (base pair)–0.68 ± 0.04 (r2 = 0.999). The fitted slope is in agreement with the slope of 0.70 predicted from the theory of Yamakawa and Fujii (19Yamakawa H. Fujii M. J. Chem. Phys. 1976; 64: 5222-5228Crossref Scopus (110) Google Scholar) for helical worm-like molecular chains without excluded volume. An alternative model (20Tirado M. Garcia de la Torre J. J. Chem. Phys. 1979; 71: 2581-2587Crossref Scopus (351) Google Scholar) also fitted the data well; the dashed curve labeled model (Fig. 1D) was computed from the equation of Tirado and Garcia de la Torre, Do = (kBT/3ηπ L)(ln p + ν), where ν = 0.312 + 0.565/p – 0.1/p2 is a correction factor for end effect, p = L/d is the ratio of DNA length to diameter, kBT is the product of Boltzmann constant and temperature, and η is medium viscosity. The poorly fitting dashed line labeled sphere (Fig. 1D) is shown for comparison and was computed for spherical molecules of equivalent molecular weight to the DNAs. Macromolecular Crowding Effects on DNA Diffusion—DNA diffusion was measured in solutions made crowded with various soluble (mobile) and fixed (immobile) macromolecules to establish the determinants of size-dependent DNA diffusion. Diffusion coefficients for DNAs were measured first in saline solutions made crowded with the soluble “crowding agent” Ficoll-70 (0–40 weight percentage). As in many prior studies of molecular crowding effects (9Ellis R.J. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2001; 26: 597-604Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1752) Google Scholar, 21van den Berg B. Ellis R.J. Dobson C.M. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 6927-6933Crossref PubMed Scopus (428) Google Scholar), Ficoll-70 was chosen as a non-interacting, compact synthetic polysaccharide that is highly soluble and produces solutions with relatively low macroscopic viscosity. Fig. 2A shows an exponential dependence of D on Ficoll-70 concentration, D = Do exp(–[C]/[C]exp), where [C]exp is the Ficoll-70 concentration (in weight percentage) at which Do is reduced by 63%. Interestingly, [C]exp was nearly identical for the very different size DNAs. Even though D/Do was reduced substantially (∼6-fold at 200 mg/ml Ficoll-70), D/Do did not depend on the DNA size (Fig. 2B), indicating that crowding by a mobile, non-interacting macromolecule cannot reproduce the reduced size-dependent DNA diffusion in cells. Similar FCS measurements of DNA diffusion were done using soluble cytosol extracts that are highly polydisperse and contain various proteins that might interact with and slow DNA diffusion. From photobleaching measurements of the diffusion of small molecules and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled dextrans, the effective concentration of obstacles (including mobile and immobile macromolecules) in cytosol is ∼100–120 mg/ml (7Seksek O. Biwersi J. Verkman A.S. J. Cell Biol. 1997; 138: 131-142Crossref PubMed Scopus (423) Google Scholar, 22Kao H.P. Abney J.R. Verkman A.S. J. Cell Biol. 1993; 120: 175-184Crossref PubMed Scopus (258) Google Scholar, 23Hou L. Lanni F. Luby-Phelps K. Biophys. J. 1990; 58: 31-43Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (71) Google Scholar). Fig. 2C shows normalized FCS data for the diffusion of 100-bp and 1-kb DNA in low (8 mg protein/ml) and high (100 mg protein/ml) concentrations of cytosol. Although the autocorrelation functions in cytosol generally showed relaxation phenomena at very early times that may be related to intrinsic cytosol fluorescence or triplet state phenomena, the data at longer times fitted well to the single component simple diffusion model with a single correlation time. Although cytosol reduced DNA diffusion coefficients in a concentration-dependent manner as expected, D/Do was not reduced with increasing DNA size (Fig. 2D) even at 100 mg/ml cytosol, where DNA diffusion was reduced by ∼5-fold. Thus, DNA interactions with soluble cytosolic macromolecules cannot account for the size-dependent DNA diffusion found in the cytoplasm in living cells. In addition to soluble proteins and macromolecules, the cell cytoplasm contains a network of cytoskeletal filaments, among which microfilamentous F-actin appears to be the most prominent (24Medalia O. Weber I. Frangakis A.S. Nicastro D. Gerisch G. Baumeister W. Science. 2002; 298: 1209-1213Crossref PubMed Scopus (674) Google Scholar). To test whether an actin network could account for the size-dependent DNA diffusion, an actin mesh was generated in vitro using purified actin at concentrations found in cells (5–12.5 mg/ml) (25Davies W.A. Stossel T.P. J. Cell Biol. 1977; 75: 941-955Crossref PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar, 26Hartwig J.H. Shevlin P. J. Cell Biol. 1986; 103: 1007-1020Crossref PubMed Scopus (138) Google Scholar) alone or together with the actin-binding protein gelsolin. D/Do was mildly reduced with DNA size at 1 mg/ml actin and substantially reduced at 8 mg/ml of actin alone or together with gelsolin (Fig. 3). For each actin concentration, DNA diffusion coefficients were at least 10–100-fold higher than the diffusion coefficients for polymerized actin filaments (<10–11 cm2/s; Ref. 27Tait J.F. Frieden C. Biochemistry. 1982; 21: 3666-3674Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar), making the actin mesh effectively immobile on the time scale of DNA diffusion. For comparison, the diffusion of rhodamine green-labeled dextrans (10 and 500 kDa) in 1 and 8 mg/ml actin networks is shown. Both dextrans (equivalent in molecular weight to 15-bp and 750-bp DNAs) diffused almost freely in the actin network, indicating little influence of the actin network on the diffusion of globular non-interacting macromolecules with 5–30 nm gyration radii (23Hou L. Lanni F. Luby-Phelps K. Biophys. J. 1990; 58: 31-43Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (71) Google Scholar). DNA Diffusion in the Cytoplasm of Living Cells—FCS measurements in cells were conducted under the same conditions as in the in vitro experiments using a 100× objective lens, low laser illumination intensity (<0.2 milliwatt), and room temperature (to minimize nuclease-induced DNA degradation) (17Pollard H. Toumaniantz G. Amos J.L. Avet-Loiseau H. Guihard G. Behr J.P. Escande D. J. Gene Med. 2001; 3: 153-164Crossref PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar, 28Lechardeur D. Sohn K.J. Haardt M. Joshi P.B. Monck M. Graham R.W. Beatty B. Squire J. O'Brodovich H. Lukacs G.L. Gene Ther. 1999; 6: 482-497Crossref PubMed Scopus (522) Google Scholar). HeLa cells were microinjected with rhodamine green-labeled DNAs and kept at room temperature for 20 min prior to measurements. The laser spot was focused in an area of cytoplasm not directly adjacent to the nucleus or the cell membrane. In initial studies, FCS data were stable at ∼15–30 min after microinjection, but changes were seen at longer times or after 37 °C incubation, which may be related to nuclease-dependent generation of smaller degradation fragments. Representative FCS curves for 3-kb DNA are shown in Fig. 4A, and deduced D/Do values are summarized in Fig. 4B. For the larger DNAs (250–4500 bp), the fitting of correlation functions required a two-component model. The fit shows a fast correlation time, τc1 = 5–20 ms, which was independent of DNA size, and a slow correlation time, τc2, that depended on DNA size and cell maneuvers. The rapid correlation time component may be related to a small amount of degraded DNA, rhodamine green-related photophysics, and/or intramolecular DNA motion/local confinement effects in a heterogeneous environment. Other studies reported similar two-component models for the analysis of fluorescent macromolecule diffusion in cells (29Larson D.R. Ma Y.M. Vogt V.M. Webb W.W. J. Cell Biol. 2003; 162: 1233-1244Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar, 30Schwille P. Korlach J. Webb W.W. Cytometry. 1999; 36: 176-182Crossref PubMed Scopus (419) Google Scholar, 31Kim S.A. Heinze K.G. Waxham M.N. Schwille P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004; 101: 105-110Crossref PubMed Scopus (112) Google Scholar). As found previously in photobleaching measurements of fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled DNAs (6Lukacs G.L. Haggie P. Seksek O. Lechardeur D. Freedman N. Verkman A.S. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 1625-1629Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (628) Google Scholar), diffusion of DNA with a single rhodamine green as measured by FCS was remarkably reduced with increasing DNA size. To test the involvement of the actin cytoskeleton in the reduced DNA diffusion, FCS measurements were done in cells after actin skeletal disruption with cytochalasin D. Fig. 4B shows that actin skeletal disruption largely eliminated the size-dependent reduction in DNA diffusion, providing in vivo support for the conclusion from solution studies that the actin mesh is an important determinant of DNA diffusion. Fig. 4B also shows a curve labeled predicted that was computed from the product of the in vitro D/Do values in the cytosol (100 mg/ml) and the actin/gelsolin mesh. The “predicted” curve is in good agreement with D/Do measured experimentally in cells, consistent with the view of the cytoplasm as a crowded soluble phase surrounded by an entangled filament network. Because FCS is based on the analysis of fluorescence intensity fluctuations produced by the diffusion of molecules into and out of a defined excitation volume, the identification and quantification of a immobile population of molecules is not possible. Because of this limitation as well as the complexities in the interpretation of FCS data in living cells (see “Discussion”), photobleaching experiments were done to confirm the conclusion that the actin cytoskeleton is the main determinant of the reduced diffusion of DNA in cytoplasm. For these studies we used a novel labeling strategy to generate brightly fluorescent DNA fragments. DNAs (500 bp and 6000 bp) were labeled with the dimeric cyanine dye YOYO-3, which binds tightly to DNA (Kd∼100 nm) and undergoes a >100-fold fluorescence enhancement upon binding to DNA. Original fluorescence recovery curves after the photobleaching of 500- and 6000-bp YOYO-3-labeled DNAs in aqueous solution are shown in Fig. 5A. Recovery curves in microinjected HeLa cells are shown in Fig. 5B for untreated cells and after 30 min of cytochalasin D treatment. Compared with photobleaching data obtained in aqueous solution, the recoveries were slower in cytoplasm for both DNA fragments. As shown previously, the plasmid-sized DNA was largely immobile in the cytoplasm of microinjected HeLa cells, whereas the 500-bp DNA fragment was mobile. Cytochalasin D treatment of microinjected cells increased remarkably the percentage of plasmid-sized DNA that was mobile (from < 20% to >70%). Similar results were found using latrunculin B to disrupt the actin cytoskeleton (data not shown). In contrast, recovery curves were similar with or without cytochalasin D treatment for the smaller 500-bp DNA, supporting the conclusion that the actin cytoskeleton is the principal determinant of the slowed diffusion of plasmid-sized DNAs in cytoplasm. The goal of this work was to determine the mechanism of the reduced mobility of non-complexed DNAs in cytoplasm with increasing DNA size. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy was used to follow DNA diffusion in vitro and in living cells. We found that labeling with a single rhodamine green fluorophore was suitable for the investigation of DNA dynamics in complex and in crowded environments using FCS. The PCR-based labeling approach gave a uniform population of fluorescently labeled DNAs in near native form and is suitable for DNA labeling with a variety of fluorescent and other probes. The principal conclusion is that the actin mesh rather than cytoplasmic crowding by diffusible macromolecules provides the rate-limiting barrier for the cellular diffusion of large, non-complexed DNAs. The mechanism of size-dependent DNA diffusion in cytoplasm was investigated from measurements of DNA diffusion in artificial solutions containing a non-interacting crowding agent (Ficoll-70), concentrated soluble cytosolic extracts, and in vitro skeletal actin networks. Diffusion of DNA in solutions made crowded with Ficoll-70 could be reduced considerably compared with diffusion of the same sized DNA in saline. However, the DNA size-dependent reduction in D/Do could not be reproduced, indicating that molecular crowding by mobile obstacles cannot account for the observed reduction in D/Do in cells. Reduced D/Do with increasing DNA size also could not be reproduced in vitro in cytosol at a protein concentration similar to that in cells and in which DNA diffusion was slowed ∼5-fold compared with its diffusion in saline. Therefore, crowding effects and DNA interactions with soluble components of cell cytosol cannot account for the reduced D/Do. However, reduced D/Do with increasing DNA size could be reproduced in vitro in a polymerized actin/gelsolin mesh at a concentration found in cells (26Hartwig J.H. Shevlin P. J. Cell Biol. 1986; 103: 1007-1020Crossref PubMed Scopus (138) Google Scholar, 32Niederman R. Amrein P.C. Hartwig J. J. Cell Biol. 1983; 96: 1400-1413Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar). Diffusion of small DNAs (<250 bp) in the actin mesh was only mildly slowed with increasing size, whereas diffusion was slowed substantially in a size-dependent manner for DNAs >250 bp. In cells, the length of actin filaments has been estimated by electron microscopy to be 100–500 nm with an ∼100-nm spacing between actin filaments (32Niederman R. Amrein P.C. Hartwig J. J. Cell Biol. 1983; 96: 1400-1413Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar, 33Stossel T.P. J. Cell Biol. 1984; 99: 15s-21sCrossref PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar). It is interesting that the size-dependent transition found here occurs at DNA of ∼250 bp, which has an extended linear length of ∼85 nm. The intracellular diffusion coefficients of the larger DNAs (>500 bp) versus DNA size were fitted by a line (on a log-log plot) with slope of –1.8, which is consistent with the theory of de Gennes predicting D ∝ (DNA size)–2 for a single reptating chain in a medium containing fixed obstacles (15De Gennes P.G. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY1979Google Scholar). We thus propose that the entanglement of relatively large, flexible DNA fragments in the actin mesh is the primary mechanism responsible for the size-dependent reduction in DNA diffusion. D/Do in the presence of a combination of mobile obstacles and a polymerized actin/gelsolin mesh is, at first approximation, the product of D/Do for each mechanism. As such, DNA diffusion in cell cytoplasm was closely modeled as a product of D/Do measured in vitro in a cytosol extract at 100 mg/ml and a polymerized actin/gelsolin mesh. The mobile obstacles are responsible for a multiplicative factor giving comparable reduction in the diffusion of DNAs of all sizes, whereas the actin mesh is responsible for the size-dependent reduction in DNA diffusion. Our analysis thus provides a quantitative accounting for the observed DNA mobility in living cells with a predictive value in assessing the effects of altered protein concentration and skeletal density on DNA diffusion. Restricted diffusion of non-complexed DNA in cytoplasm is thought to be a key barrier to gene delivery in vivo, where DNA degradation competes with diffusion (1Zuber G. Dauty E. Nothisen M. Belguise P. Behr J.P. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001; 52: 245-253Crossref PubMed Scopus (201) Google Scholar). The release of non-complexed DNA into the cytoplasm was shown using the T7 polymerase expression system (34Gao X. Huang L. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993; 21: 2867-2872Crossref PubMed Scopus (85) Google Scholar). Because the lifetime of cytoplasmic DNA is relatively short (60–90 min) (28Lechardeur D. Sohn K.J. Haardt M. Joshi P.B. Monck M. Graham R.W. Beatty B. Squire J. O'Brodovich H. Lukacs G.L. Gene Ther. 1999; 6: 482-497Crossref PubMed Scopus (522) Google Scholar), the transport of DNA toward the nucleus should be as fast as possible for efficient transgene expression. The photobleaching studies here indicated that the diffusion of plasmid-sized DNA is very slow, with <20% of DNA being able to diffuse through the cytoplasm. However, disruption of the actin network increased both the mobile DNA fraction as well as its diffusivity. Viruses have evolved efficient DNA packaging and intracellular transport mechanisms to deliver their nucleic acids to the nucleus (35Smith A.E. Helenius A. Science. 2004; 304: 237-242Crossref PubMed Scopus (625) Google Scholar). Because diffusion in the crowded cytoplasm is inefficient given the large size of most capsids, viruses often exploit the cytoskeleton and cellular motor proteins to move through the cell. As shown here for non-viral gene vectors, the actin cytoskeleton also poses a barrier against the inward movement of viruses that enter directly through the plasma membrane (36Pelkmans L. Puntener D. Helenius A. Science. 2002; 296: 535-539Crossref PubMed Scopus (598) Google Scholar). To overcome the skeletal barrier, some viruses such as SV40 activate tyrosine kinase-induced signaling cascades that lead to the local dissociation of filamentous actin. Because macromolecule-sized solutes with a gyration radius (RG) up to 30 nm are freely diffusible in the cytoplasm (7Seksek O. Biwersi J. Verkman A.S. J. Cell Biol. 1997; 138: 131-142Crossref PubMed Scopus (423) Google Scholar), strategies to increase DNA mobility, such as DNA compaction into spherical 30 nm-particles (37Dauty E. Remy J.S. Blessing T. Behr J.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 9227-9234Crossref PubMed Scopus (168) Google Scholar) and active transport of the DNA toward the nucleus, are predicted to enhance the efficiency of transgene delivery (38Sebestyen M.G. Ludtke J.J. Bassik M.C. Zhang G. Budker V. Lukhtanov E.A. Hagstrom J.E. Wolff J.A. Nat. Biotechnol. 1998; 16: 80-85Crossref PubMed Scopus (245) Google Scholar, 39Zanta M.A. Belguise-Valladier P. Behr J.P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 91-96Crossref PubMed Scopus (679) Google Scholar). In summary, using the complementary fluorescence techniques of FCS and photobleaching, we have established a quantitative mechanism for the reduced translational diffusion of large, non-complexed DNAs in cell cytoplasm and identified the actin cytoskeleton as a new barrier for non-viral gene delivery. We thank Dr. Peter Haggie for helpful discussions and Dr. Yuanlin Song for advice in mouse liver preparation." @default.
• W2078392705 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2078392705 creator A5042356327 @default.
• W2078392705 creator A5045764394 @default.
• W2078392705 date "2005-03-01" @default.
• W2078392705 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2078392705 title "Actin Cytoskeleton as the Principal Determinant of Size-dependent DNA Mobility in Cytoplasm" @default.
• W2078392705 cites W1965985935 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W1969073916 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W1970948529 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W1973911001 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W1976528399 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W1977502221 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W1979799065 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W1980844900 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W1986606329 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W1994294376 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2015918937 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2021882134 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2023842478 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2025042015 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2030146524 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2034508297 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2038049928 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2047977191 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2051556871 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2055201762 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2068237765 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2068350301 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2078392231 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2080648192 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2086274688 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2093685827 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2110706129 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2116043125 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2128240046 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2128341772 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2130523321 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2131187223 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2139763819 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2155479470 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2158028388 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2164545166 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2165847215 @default.
• W2078392705 cites W2167949866 @default.
• W2078392705 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m412374200" @default.
• W2078392705 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15632160" @default.
• W2078392705 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2078392705 type Work @default.
• W2078392705 sameAs 2078392705 @default.
• W2078392705 citedByCount "206" @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052012 @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052013 @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052014 @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052015 @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052016 @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052017 @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052018 @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052019 @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052020 @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052021 @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052022 @default.
• W2078392705 countsByYear W20783927052023 @default.
• W2078392705 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2078392705 hasAuthorship W2078392705A5042356327 @default.
• W2078392705 hasAuthorship W2078392705A5045764394 @default.
• W2078392705 hasBestOaLocation W20783927051 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConcept C12554922 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConcept C125705527 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConcept C142669718 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConcept C1491633281 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConcept C190062978 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConcept C2993400109 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConcept C552990157 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConceptScore W2078392705C12554922 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConceptScore W2078392705C125705527 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConceptScore W2078392705C142669718 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConceptScore W2078392705C1491633281 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConceptScore W2078392705C185592680 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConceptScore W2078392705C190062978 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConceptScore W2078392705C2993400109 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConceptScore W2078392705C552990157 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConceptScore W2078392705C55493867 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConceptScore W2078392705C86803240 @default.
• W2078392705 hasConceptScore W2078392705C95444343 @default.
• W2078392705 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2078392705 hasLocation W20783927051 @default.
• W2078392705 hasOpenAccess W2078392705 @default.
• W2078392705 hasPrimaryLocation W20783927051 @default.
• W2078392705 hasRelatedWork W113776368 @default.
• W2078392705 hasRelatedWork W131757845 @default.
• W2078392705 hasRelatedWork W197432475 @default.
• W2078392705 hasRelatedWork W1979812625 @default.
• W2078392705 hasRelatedWork W2107903378 @default.

• next