FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078475664> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2078475664 endingPage "38" @default.
• W2078475664 startingPage "35" @default.
• W2078475664 abstract "Aims: To identify the clinical value of pre-operative ipsilateral mammography in patients with Paget's disease of the breast. Method: The mammograms and histological data of 27 patients with Paget's disease and 60 patients with symptomatic DCIS without Paget's disease were reviewed and compared. Results: Forty-four percent of patients with Paget's disease had normal mammograms. Mammography did not discriminate between DCIS and invasive disease, and could not predict DCIS sub-type. DCIS was large cell in 80% of patients with Paget's disease. Given that large cell DCIS in non Paget's patients is normally visible mammographically, the large proportion of Paget's patients with normal mammography is difficult to explain, but could be due to the small size of the lesions. Comparison of the Paget's and non-Paget's groups showed that large cell solid disease was more common, small cell cribriform less common and normal mammography more common in the Paget's group. Given that mastectomy is the treatment of choice, the only clinical value of ipsilateral mammography in our unit would be to allow image guided core biopsy of any detected mammographic abnormalities to determine the presence of invasive disease prior to surgery, thus indicating the need for node sampling pre-operatively rather than as a delayed procedure. This study also confirms that mammography is of little help in deciding if breast conserving surgery is appropriate for individual cases of Paget's disease of the nipple due to the insensitivity of mammography in showing the site of disease. Aims: To identify the clinical value of pre-operative ipsilateral mammography in patients with Paget's disease of the breast. Method: The mammograms and histological data of 27 patients with Paget's disease and 60 patients with symptomatic DCIS without Paget's disease were reviewed and compared. Results: Forty-four percent of patients with Paget's disease had normal mammograms. Mammography did not discriminate between DCIS and invasive disease, and could not predict DCIS sub-type. DCIS was large cell in 80% of patients with Paget's disease. Given that large cell DCIS in non Paget's patients is normally visible mammographically, the large proportion of Paget's patients with normal mammography is difficult to explain, but could be due to the small size of the lesions. Comparison of the Paget's and non-Paget's groups showed that large cell solid disease was more common, small cell cribriform less common and normal mammography more common in the Paget's group. Given that mastectomy is the treatment of choice, the only clinical value of ipsilateral mammography in our unit would be to allow image guided core biopsy of any detected mammographic abnormalities to determine the presence of invasive disease prior to surgery, thus indicating the need for node sampling pre-operatively rather than as a delayed procedure. This study also confirms that mammography is of little help in deciding if breast conserving surgery is appropriate for individual cases of Paget's disease of the nipple due to the insensitivity of mammography in showing the site of disease." @default.
• W2078475664 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2078475664 creator A5004439133 @default.
• W2078475664 creator A5021264670 @default.
• W2078475664 creator A5043325585 @default.
• W2078475664 creator A5055128088 @default.
• W2078475664 creator A5063865167 @default.
• W2078475664 creator A5075105813 @default.
• W2078475664 date "1996-01-01" @default.
• W2078475664 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2078475664 title "Is ipsilateral mammography worthwhile in paget's disease of the breast?" @default.
• W2078475664 cites W1488350964 @default.
• W2078475664 cites W1978046563 @default.
• W2078475664 cites W1983847971 @default.
• W2078475664 cites W2008452993 @default.
• W2078475664 cites W2046532014 @default.
• W2078475664 cites W2074095958 @default.
• W2078475664 cites W2084218242 @default.
• W2078475664 cites W2139649519 @default.
• W2078475664 cites W2142634790 @default.
• W2078475664 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80216-9" @default.
• W2078475664 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8605770" @default.
• W2078475664 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2078475664 type Work @default.
• W2078475664 sameAs 2078475664 @default.
• W2078475664 citedByCount "44" @default.
• W2078475664 countsByYear W20784756642013 @default.
• W2078475664 countsByYear W20784756642015 @default.
• W2078475664 countsByYear W20784756642016 @default.
• W2078475664 countsByYear W20784756642019 @default.
• W2078475664 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2078475664 hasAuthorship W2078475664A5004439133 @default.
• W2078475664 hasAuthorship W2078475664A5021264670 @default.
• W2078475664 hasAuthorship W2078475664A5043325585 @default.
• W2078475664 hasAuthorship W2078475664A5055128088 @default.
• W2078475664 hasAuthorship W2078475664A5063865167 @default.
• W2078475664 hasAuthorship W2078475664A5075105813 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConceptScore W2078475664C121608353 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConceptScore W2078475664C126322002 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConceptScore W2078475664C126838900 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConceptScore W2078475664C142724271 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConceptScore W2078475664C2775934546 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConceptScore W2078475664C2779134260 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConceptScore W2078475664C2780472235 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConceptScore W2078475664C530470458 @default.
• W2078475664 hasConceptScore W2078475664C71924100 @default.
• W2078475664 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2078475664 hasLocation W20784756641 @default.
• W2078475664 hasLocation W20784756642 @default.
• W2078475664 hasOpenAccess W2078475664 @default.
• W2078475664 hasPrimaryLocation W20784756641 @default.
• W2078475664 hasRelatedWork W2063327216 @default.
• W2078475664 hasRelatedWork W2089057169 @default.
• W2078475664 hasRelatedWork W2219774581 @default.
• W2078475664 hasRelatedWork W2353729797 @default.
• W2078475664 hasRelatedWork W2359897561 @default.
• W2078475664 hasRelatedWork W2413263973 @default.
• W2078475664 hasRelatedWork W2413296794 @default.
• W2078475664 hasRelatedWork W2436129894 @default.
• W2078475664 hasRelatedWork W3021601717 @default.
• W2078475664 hasRelatedWork W3166059729 @default.
• W2078475664 hasVolume "51" @default.
• W2078475664 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2078475664 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2078475664 magId "2078475664" @default.
• W2078475664 workType "article" @default.