FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078493836> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2078493836 endingPage "201" @default.
• W2078493836 startingPage "190" @default.
• W2078493836 abstract "OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS Employees with burnout experience a persistent, negative work-related state of mind primarily characterized by exhaustion, decreased motivation, and a sense of reduced effectiveness. Although most employees with burnout (67%) were found to apply an efficient high-effort strategy like healthy controls, significantly more employees with burnout (33%) than healthy controls (8%) applied a low-effort strategy. However, the low-effort strategy used by a significant number of burnout employees does not seem to be an adaptive way of coping with fatigue but was rather the result of a structurally reduced motivation to expend effort and/or cognitive impairments. The majority of burnout employees appeared capable of performing tasks adequately and applying high-effort strategies, but they experience substantial distress during task performance. Employers may consider temporarily providing these employees with less-demanding tasks, as a reduction in stress may enable a normalization of relevant biological processes. A small group of employees with burnout did not appear to be able to adequately perform complex as well as simple tasks, and offering such employees a cognitive behavioral treatment program for burnout may be of merit. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Several studies have shown that fatigued individuals may adapt their task performance strategically. It is not known, though, whether such an adaptation is also applied by employees with burnout who suffer from long-term fatigue. Strategic adjustments can be achieved by applying simpler response strategies with lesser demands on working memory. Should employees with burnout employ these strategic adaptations to task performance, it would explain why burnout is accompanied by compromised executive functioning and not difficulties with more automatic cognitive processes. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether reduced cognitive performance in burnout could be explained by fatigue-related strategic adaptations of task performance. Methods: Forty employees with burnout and 40 healthy controls were presented with a task they could execute either by adopting an effective but high-effort strategy or by applying a less effective low-effort strategy. Results: Significantly more employees with burnout than healthy controls applied a low-effort strategy, even though the majority used a high-effort strategy. The employees with burnout that applied a low-effort strategy failed to maintain their performance level and reported high levels of fatigue, aversion, and effort. Conclusions: Employees with burnout do not appear to adjust their performance strategically as fatigued healthy employees do. Most employees with burnout applied a high-effort performance strategy despite high levels of distress, just like non-fatigued healthy controls. A minority of the employees with burnout applied a low-effort strategy and actually did not seem to try to perform even the simple tasks. Their inferior performance seems to be the result of a structural reduced motivation to spend effort and/or cognitive impairments." @default.
• W2078493836 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2078493836 creator A5023498598 @default.
• W2078493836 creator A5030177978 @default.
• W2078493836 creator A5041215719 @default.
• W2078493836 creator A5045313358 @default.
• W2078493836 date "2013-07-01" @default.
• W2078493836 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2078493836 title "Do Employees with Burnout Prefer Low-Effort Performance Strategies?" @default.
• W2078493836 cites W1543414341 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W1978648195 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W1985186735 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W1987964789 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W1994342932 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2001904890 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2006170691 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2010370367 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2022079277 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2027536288 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2032353976 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2053272917 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2071226957 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2073015951 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2075628640 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2079064706 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2080866745 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2082647777 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2093404477 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2096188680 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2101152292 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2112778345 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2118186738 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2129758550 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2131497698 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2133927304 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2141309263 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2142907955 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2147851174 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2156926719 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2162571494 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2167424525 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2287115451 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W2399443682 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W4213284804 @default.
• W2078493836 cites W4237686700 @default.
• W2078493836 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2013.828666" @default.
• W2078493836 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2078493836 type Work @default.
• W2078493836 sameAs 2078493836 @default.
• W2078493836 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2078493836 countsByYear W20784938362014 @default.
• W2078493836 countsByYear W20784938362016 @default.
• W2078493836 countsByYear W20784938362021 @default.
• W2078493836 countsByYear W20784938362022 @default.
• W2078493836 countsByYear W20784938362023 @default.
• W2078493836 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2078493836 hasAuthorship W2078493836A5023498598 @default.
• W2078493836 hasAuthorship W2078493836A5030177978 @default.
• W2078493836 hasAuthorship W2078493836A5041215719 @default.
• W2078493836 hasAuthorship W2078493836A5045313358 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C139265228 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C143916079 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C2776378700 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C73282008 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C139265228 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C143916079 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C15744967 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C162324750 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C169760540 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C169900460 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C180747234 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C187736073 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C2776378700 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C2780451532 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C70410870 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C73282008 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C75630572 @default.
• W2078493836 hasConceptScore W2078493836C77805123 @default.
• W2078493836 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2078493836 hasLocation W20784938361 @default.
• W2078493836 hasOpenAccess W2078493836 @default.
• W2078493836 hasPrimaryLocation W20784938361 @default.
• W2078493836 hasRelatedWork W2025823144 @default.
• W2078493836 hasRelatedWork W2042130734 @default.
• W2078493836 hasRelatedWork W2051838999 @default.
• W2078493836 hasRelatedWork W2097602473 @default.
• W2078493836 hasRelatedWork W2139105618 @default.
• W2078493836 hasRelatedWork W2139977042 @default.

• next