Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078502162> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 90 of
90
with 100 items per page.
- W2078502162 endingPage "287" @default.
- W2078502162 startingPage "283" @default.
- W2078502162 abstract "IntroductionEndovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) requires the patient's extended exposure to x-rays, before, during, and after the intervention. The aim of this study was to determine the radiation exposure of patients undergoing EVAR and to assess the probability for the induction of both late and early radiation-related effects.MethodsDuring the period of May 2006 to December 2007 EVAR was carried out in 62 patients using a mobile C-arm unit. The following dosimetric quantities were assessed: fluoroscopy time, cumulative dose in air, dose-area product, field area, and peak skin dose.ResultsThe duration of fluoroscopy and the body mass index were found to be the main factors that influence the radiation burden in our hospital. The mean effective dose per procedure, 6.2 mSv, was between that from a planar coronary angiography and a coronary angioplasty. Taking into account the computed tomography (CT) procedure-related angiographies carried out during the first year, patients receive a total effective dose of about 62 mSv within the first year. In vivo dosimetry showed that the peak skin dose was linearly correlated with cumulative dose in air and did not exceed 1.0 Gy, ie, it was less than the threshold for any acute skin reaction.ConclusionRepair of abdominal aortic aneurysm results in substantial radiation burden. Radiation-related risks for carcinogenesis and skin injuries are factors that have to be taken into account in the selection of the strategy of each facility. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) requires the patient's extended exposure to x-rays, before, during, and after the intervention. The aim of this study was to determine the radiation exposure of patients undergoing EVAR and to assess the probability for the induction of both late and early radiation-related effects. During the period of May 2006 to December 2007 EVAR was carried out in 62 patients using a mobile C-arm unit. The following dosimetric quantities were assessed: fluoroscopy time, cumulative dose in air, dose-area product, field area, and peak skin dose. The duration of fluoroscopy and the body mass index were found to be the main factors that influence the radiation burden in our hospital. The mean effective dose per procedure, 6.2 mSv, was between that from a planar coronary angiography and a coronary angioplasty. Taking into account the computed tomography (CT) procedure-related angiographies carried out during the first year, patients receive a total effective dose of about 62 mSv within the first year. In vivo dosimetry showed that the peak skin dose was linearly correlated with cumulative dose in air and did not exceed 1.0 Gy, ie, it was less than the threshold for any acute skin reaction. Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm results in substantial radiation burden. Radiation-related risks for carcinogenesis and skin injuries are factors that have to be taken into account in the selection of the strategy of each facility." @default.
- W2078502162 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2078502162 creator A5001224236 @default.
- W2078502162 creator A5006435646 @default.
- W2078502162 creator A5021543870 @default.
- W2078502162 creator A5027143962 @default.
- W2078502162 creator A5027304563 @default.
- W2078502162 creator A5071363949 @default.
- W2078502162 date "2009-02-01" @default.
- W2078502162 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
- W2078502162 title "Radiation burden of patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair" @default.
- W2078502162 cites W1987119241 @default.
- W2078502162 cites W2014019813 @default.
- W2078502162 cites W2050718666 @default.
- W2078502162 cites W2069629525 @default.
- W2078502162 cites W2077559761 @default.
- W2078502162 cites W2102353109 @default.
- W2078502162 cites W2164208485 @default.
- W2078502162 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.003" @default.
- W2078502162 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216946" @default.
- W2078502162 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2078502162 type Work @default.
- W2078502162 sameAs 2078502162 @default.
- W2078502162 citedByCount "69" @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622012 @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622013 @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622014 @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622015 @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622016 @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622017 @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622018 @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622019 @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622020 @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622021 @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622022 @default.
- W2078502162 countsByYear W20785021622023 @default.
- W2078502162 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2078502162 hasAuthorship W2078502162A5001224236 @default.
- W2078502162 hasAuthorship W2078502162A5006435646 @default.
- W2078502162 hasAuthorship W2078502162A5021543870 @default.
- W2078502162 hasAuthorship W2078502162A5027143962 @default.
- W2078502162 hasAuthorship W2078502162A5027304563 @default.
- W2078502162 hasAuthorship W2078502162A5071363949 @default.
- W2078502162 hasBestOaLocation W20785021621 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C149857219 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C151032500 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C2776098176 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C2776543907 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C2776805002 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C2779993416 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConcept C79905245 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C126838900 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C141071460 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C149857219 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C151032500 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C2776098176 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C2776543907 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C2776805002 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C2779993416 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C2989005 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C71924100 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C75088862 @default.
- W2078502162 hasConceptScore W2078502162C79905245 @default.
- W2078502162 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2078502162 hasLocation W20785021621 @default.
- W2078502162 hasLocation W20785021622 @default.
- W2078502162 hasOpenAccess W2078502162 @default.
- W2078502162 hasPrimaryLocation W20785021621 @default.
- W2078502162 hasRelatedWork W1968731988 @default.
- W2078502162 hasRelatedWork W1978261635 @default.
- W2078502162 hasRelatedWork W2004947124 @default.
- W2078502162 hasRelatedWork W2078502162 @default.
- W2078502162 hasRelatedWork W2107952077 @default.
- W2078502162 hasRelatedWork W2108519856 @default.
- W2078502162 hasRelatedWork W2163578423 @default.
- W2078502162 hasRelatedWork W2361353559 @default.
- W2078502162 hasRelatedWork W2509001129 @default.
- W2078502162 hasRelatedWork W3163115693 @default.
- W2078502162 hasVolume "49" @default.
- W2078502162 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2078502162 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2078502162 magId "2078502162" @default.
- W2078502162 workType "article" @default.