FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078506324> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2078506324 endingPage "956" @default.
• W2078506324 startingPage "946" @default.
• W2078506324 abstract "Purpose: The optimal anesthetic for use during carotid endarterectomy is controversial. Advocates of regional anesthesia suggest that it may reduce the incidence of perioperative complications in addition to decreasing operative time and hospital costs. To determine whether the anesthetic method correlated with the outcome of the operation, a retrospective review of 3975 carotid operations performed over a 32-year period was performed.Methods: The records of all patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy at our institution from 1962 to 1994 were retrospectively reviewed. Operations performed with the patient under regional anesthesia were compared with those performed with the patient under general anesthesia with respect to preoperative risk factors and perioperative complications.Results: Regional anesthesia was used in 3382 operations (85.1%). There were no significant differences in the age, gender ratio, or the rates of concomitant medical illnesses between the two patient populations. The frequency of perioperative stroke in the series was 2.2%; that of myocardial infarction, 1.7%; and that of perioperative death, 1.5%. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, or death on the basis of anesthetic technique. A trend toward higher frequencies of perioperative stroke (3.2% vs 2.0%) and perioperative death (2.0% vs 1.4%) in the general anesthesia group was noted. In examining operative indications, however, there was a significant increase in the percentage of patients receiving general anesthesia who had sustained preoperative strokes when compared with the regional anesthesia patients (36.1% vs 26.4%; p < 0.01). There was also a statistically significant higher frequency of contralateral total occlusion in the general anesthesia group (21.8% vs 15.4%; p = 0.001). The trend toward increased perioperative strokes in the general anesthesia group may be explicable either by the above differences in the patient populations or by actual differences based on anesthetic technique that favor regional anesthesia.Conclusions: In a retrospective review of a large series of carotid operations, regional anesthesia was shown to be applicable to the vast majority of patients with good clinical outcome. Although the advantages over general anesthesia are perhaps small, the versatility and safety of the technique is sufficient reason for vascular surgeons to include it in their armamentarium of surgical skills. Considering that carotid endarterectomy is a procedure in which complication rates are exceedingly low, a rigidly controlled, prospective randomized trial may be required to accurately assess these differences. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24;946-56.)" @default.
• W2078506324 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2078506324 creator A5003600205 @default.
• W2078506324 creator A5018483426 @default.
• W2078506324 creator A5034656389 @default.
• W2078506324 creator A5037116542 @default.
• W2078506324 creator A5037117001 @default.
• W2078506324 creator A5059029967 @default.
• W2078506324 creator A5073754053 @default.
• W2078506324 creator A5090960045 @default.
• W2078506324 date "1996-12-01" @default.
• W2078506324 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2078506324 title "A comparison of regional and general anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy" @default.
• W2078506324 cites W1974206392 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2008817616 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2017182381 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2018457901 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2028157842 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2030593793 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2051186734 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2054130774 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2066895264 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2068913606 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2081703316 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2115075752 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2160788168 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2164648447 @default.
• W2078506324 cites W2334935936 @default.
• W2078506324 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70040-x" @default.
• W2078506324 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8976348" @default.
• W2078506324 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2078506324 type Work @default.
• W2078506324 sameAs 2078506324 @default.
• W2078506324 citedByCount "83" @default.
• W2078506324 countsByYear W20785063242012 @default.
• W2078506324 countsByYear W20785063242014 @default.
• W2078506324 countsByYear W20785063242015 @default.
• W2078506324 countsByYear W20785063242016 @default.
• W2078506324 countsByYear W20785063242018 @default.
• W2078506324 countsByYear W20785063242019 @default.
• W2078506324 countsByYear W20785063242020 @default.
• W2078506324 countsByYear W20785063242022 @default.
• W2078506324 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2078506324 hasAuthorship W2078506324A5003600205 @default.
• W2078506324 hasAuthorship W2078506324A5018483426 @default.
• W2078506324 hasAuthorship W2078506324A5034656389 @default.
• W2078506324 hasAuthorship W2078506324A5037116542 @default.
• W2078506324 hasAuthorship W2078506324A5037117001 @default.
• W2078506324 hasAuthorship W2078506324A5059029967 @default.
• W2078506324 hasAuthorship W2078506324A5073754053 @default.
• W2078506324 hasAuthorship W2078506324A5090960045 @default.
• W2078506324 hasBestOaLocation W20785063241 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C195910791 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C2778162923 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C2779384505 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C2781068581 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C2987047532 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C127413603 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C141071460 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C164705383 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C195910791 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C2778162923 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C2779384505 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C2780645631 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C2781068581 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C2987047532 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C31174226 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C42219234 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C500558357 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C71924100 @default.
• W2078506324 hasConceptScore W2078506324C78519656 @default.
• W2078506324 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2078506324 hasLocation W20785063241 @default.
• W2078506324 hasLocation W20785063242 @default.
• W2078506324 hasOpenAccess W2078506324 @default.
• W2078506324 hasPrimaryLocation W20785063241 @default.
• W2078506324 hasRelatedWork W136001935 @default.
• W2078506324 hasRelatedWork W1980584009 @default.
• W2078506324 hasRelatedWork W2058586059 @default.
• W2078506324 hasRelatedWork W2078506324 @default.
• W2078506324 hasRelatedWork W2087392442 @default.
• W2078506324 hasRelatedWork W2138522460 @default.
• W2078506324 hasRelatedWork W2762671404 @default.
• W2078506324 hasRelatedWork W2996108252 @default.
• W2078506324 hasRelatedWork W3083934830 @default.
• W2078506324 hasRelatedWork W4236058717 @default.
• W2078506324 hasVolume "24" @default.
• W2078506324 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2078506324 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next