FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078598579> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2078598579 endingPage "81" @default.
• W2078598579 startingPage "78" @default.
• W2078598579 abstract "It is customary—albeit perhaps simplistic—to identify four ethical principles as the basis for good medical practice.1 These are beneficence, non-maleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice, primarily distributive justice. The challenge for the practising clinician is to determine a proper course of action when these principles conflict, particularly when the individual, social, or financial consequences of new and perhaps promising treatments are known incompletely. Decisions taken in good faith are now often subject to public comment or criticism, and the National Health Service and other legislation add further constraints by introducing new rights or prescriptive guidelines without necessarily identifying the resources to fulfil these obligations. Many of these concerns have been part and parcel of medical practice for centuries, but it is only recently that the aura of the always wise and caring practitioner has been challenged by an increasingly assertive and vociferous public, ready to seek legal redress for perceived or actual wrongs. There is, of course, no sound reason why judicial decisions are any more cogent on matters of ethical principle than those of the medical profession, but society has created a legal system to regulate the conduct of its members and empowers the judiciary to resolve conflict. Any consideration of the moral basis of medical practice must therefore also take account of judicial determination of those questions of principle which have reached the courts. Examples of ethical conflict spawned by lung disease are considered here in the light of decisions made by the English courts.The surgical management of lung cancer is a good example of potential conflict between beneficence and non-maleficence. Surgery is painful and entails risk. Is this “maleficence” warranted by the anticipated “beneficence” of disease alleviated or even cured? The practitioner develops a trained enthusiasm to advocate treatment aimed at prolonging life but does …" @default.
• W2078598579 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2078598579 creator A5014892551 @default.
• W2078598579 date "2001-01-01" @default.
• W2078598579 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2078598579 title "Ethical problems in respiratory care: the role of the law" @default.
• W2078598579 cites W1521621490 @default.
• W2078598579 cites W1978310198 @default.
• W2078598579 cites W2037624403 @default.
• W2078598579 cites W2045422753 @default.
• W2078598579 cites W2066670288 @default.
• W2078598579 cites W2071379566 @default.
• W2078598579 cites W2079880067 @default.
• W2078598579 cites W2120229733 @default.
• W2078598579 cites W2202970737 @default.
• W2078598579 cites W653575307 @default.
• W2078598579 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax.56.1.78" @default.
• W2078598579 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1745914" @default.
• W2078598579 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11120910" @default.
• W2078598579 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2078598579 type Work @default.
• W2078598579 sameAs 2078598579 @default.
• W2078598579 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2078598579 countsByYear W20785985792023 @default.
• W2078598579 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2078598579 hasAuthorship W2078598579A5014892551 @default.
• W2078598579 hasBestOaLocation W20785985791 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConcept C3017721199 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConcept C534529494 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConceptScore W2078598579C126322002 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConceptScore W2078598579C17744445 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConceptScore W2078598579C177713679 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConceptScore W2078598579C199539241 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConceptScore W2078598579C3017721199 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConceptScore W2078598579C534529494 @default.
• W2078598579 hasConceptScore W2078598579C71924100 @default.
• W2078598579 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2078598579 hasLocation W20785985791 @default.
• W2078598579 hasLocation W20785985792 @default.
• W2078598579 hasLocation W20785985793 @default.
• W2078598579 hasLocation W20785985794 @default.
• W2078598579 hasOpenAccess W2078598579 @default.
• W2078598579 hasPrimaryLocation W20785985791 @default.
• W2078598579 hasRelatedWork W1539622224 @default.
• W2078598579 hasRelatedWork W1985762950 @default.
• W2078598579 hasRelatedWork W2105528989 @default.
• W2078598579 hasRelatedWork W2133952222 @default.
• W2078598579 hasRelatedWork W2395967564 @default.
• W2078598579 hasRelatedWork W2479878035 @default.
• W2078598579 hasRelatedWork W3198735617 @default.
• W2078598579 hasRelatedWork W4230870081 @default.
• W2078598579 hasRelatedWork W4252371801 @default.
• W2078598579 hasRelatedWork W3126228311 @default.
• W2078598579 hasVolume "56" @default.
• W2078598579 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2078598579 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2078598579 magId "2078598579" @default.
• W2078598579 workType "article" @default.