FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078659256> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2078659256 abstract "You have accessJournal of UrologyTechnology & Instruments: Robotics: Benign & Malignant Disease (II)1 Apr 20131410 NOVEL USE OF THE CAPIO URETHRAL ANASTOMOTIC SUTURING DEVICE: A 50 CASE ASSESSMENT Elleson A. Schurtz, Jhanelle E. Markes, Mark R. Newton, and James A. Brown Elleson A. SchurtzElleson A. Schurtz Iowa City, IA More articles by this author , Jhanelle E. MarkesJhanelle E. Markes Iowa City, IA More articles by this author , Mark R. NewtonMark R. Newton Iowa City, IA More articles by this author , and James A. BrownJames A. Brown Iowa City, IA More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2764AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Reported advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) over open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) include less blood loss and a lower bladder neck contracture (BNC) rate. A recent modification to the RRP is the utilization of the Capio suture capture device for placement of urethrovesical anastomotic sutures. This device eliminates the need to place freehand sutures and increases control and precise placement of sutures. We hypothesized that use of the Capio device would reduce RRP BNC rates. We examined a 50-case, single-surgeon, single-institution sequential series for the incidence of BNC using the Capio device for urethrovesical anastomosis in RRP and compared it to published rates for RRP and RALP. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed evaluating a series of 50 RRP utilizing the Capio device between February 2010 and May 2012. Variables examined included patient demographics, pathology, and postoperative complications. Postoperative BNC rates were compared to previously published BNC rates in RRP and RALP performed without the Capio device. RESULTS In all 50 cases, a resident physician surgeon used the Capio device and performed the majority of the anastomoses. The mean follow-up was 13.1 months. Forty-seven patients (94%) had follow-up data available for longer than 90 days postop. No patients were diagnosed with BNC within 90 days. Two patients (4%) subsequently developed BNC requiring treatment. One patient had a clinically insignificant BNC that was diagnosed 18 months postop due to inability to pass a Foley catheter when hospitalized for sepsis. The second patient was diagnosed 8 months postop after complaints of weak stream and frequency. An overall 4% BNC rate, and a clinically symptomatic 2% rate, was observed in a 50 sequential case series using the Capio device. This rate was on the lower end of published RRP BNC rates of 2-19%. It and was near the published RALP BNC rates of 0-3%. Many of these RALP series included procedures in which a faculty surgeon performed the anastomotic procedure. CONCLUSIONS Control and precision of the Capio device in creation of the anastomosis, even in a training situation, allows for BNC rates similar to those reported after a RALP continuous anastomosis, but larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to fully evaluate the efficacy of the Capio device. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e577-e578 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Elleson A. Schurtz Iowa City, IA More articles by this author Jhanelle E. Markes Iowa City, IA More articles by this author Mark R. Newton Iowa City, IA More articles by this author James A. Brown Iowa City, IA More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2078659256 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2078659256 creator A5007651519 @default.
• W2078659256 creator A5029207342 @default.
• W2078659256 creator A5065012851 @default.
• W2078659256 creator A5087220330 @default.
• W2078659256 date "2013-04-01" @default.
• W2078659256 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2078659256 title "1410 NOVEL USE OF THE CAPIO URETHRAL ANASTOMOTIC SUTURING DEVICE: A 50 CASE ASSESSMENT" @default.
• W2078659256 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2764" @default.
• W2078659256 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2078659256 type Work @default.
• W2078659256 sameAs 2078659256 @default.
• W2078659256 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2078659256 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2078659256 hasAuthorship W2078659256A5007651519 @default.
• W2078659256 hasAuthorship W2078659256A5029207342 @default.
• W2078659256 hasAuthorship W2078659256A5065012851 @default.
• W2078659256 hasAuthorship W2078659256A5087220330 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C122732770 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C2776410324 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C2778660094 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C2779466945 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C2779762690 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C121608353 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C122732770 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C126322002 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C126894567 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C141071460 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C144024400 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C149923435 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C2776235491 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C2776410324 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C2777327002 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C2778660094 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C2779466945 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C2779762690 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C2780084366 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C61434518 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C71924100 @default.
• W2078659256 hasConceptScore W2078659256C8443397 @default.
• W2078659256 hasIssue "4S" @default.
• W2078659256 hasLocation W20786592561 @default.
• W2078659256 hasOpenAccess W2078659256 @default.
• W2078659256 hasPrimaryLocation W20786592561 @default.
• W2078659256 hasRelatedWork W183642286 @default.
• W2078659256 hasRelatedWork W1984812825 @default.
• W2078659256 hasRelatedWork W2003826265 @default.
• W2078659256 hasRelatedWork W2029503976 @default.
• W2078659256 hasRelatedWork W2038262890 @default.
• W2078659256 hasRelatedWork W2078289355 @default.
• W2078659256 hasRelatedWork W2367094828 @default.
• W2078659256 hasRelatedWork W2403308799 @default.
• W2078659256 hasRelatedWork W2594530265 @default.
• W2078659256 hasRelatedWork W2610047481 @default.
• W2078659256 hasVolume "189" @default.
• W2078659256 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2078659256 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2078659256 magId "2078659256" @default.
• W2078659256 workType "article" @default.