FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078718448> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2078718448 endingPage "72" @default.
• W2078718448 startingPage "63" @default.
• W2078718448 abstract "A series of experiments were conducted to investigate elements which affect the enantiomeric recognition properties of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) in the HPLC mode. Our results show that the recognition properties of MIPs are greatly influenced by the mobile phase used. For a polymer prepared in acetonitrile, a good enantiomeric separation was observed when acetonitrile-based mobile phase was used, when the mobile phase was changed to chloroform-based, no enantiomeric recognition was observed although the sample molecule was retarded. This indicates that the specific co-operative binding interactions between the functional groups at the imprinted polymer's recognition sites and the sample molecule were considerably disrupted and only non-specific interactions remained. When the mobile phase was changed back to acetonitrile-based, the recognition was regained. In contrast, for polymers prepared in chloroform, chloroform-based mobile phase gave much better separation than acetonitrile-based mobile phase. When other solvents were tested, significant solvent effects were generally observed. Based on these observations, the recognition properties of the methacrylic acid (MAA)-co-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) polymers were reinvestigated, and the results show that by simply using an optimised mobile phase system, significantly improved recognition over previously reported results was observed. For a polymer made against Cbz-L-Trp, 100 microg of Cbz-D,L-Trp was separated with a separation factor (alpha) of 4.23 and a resolution (Rs) of 3.87, whereas in the previous report, 10 microg of Cbz-D,L-Trp was only separated with alpha = 1.67 and Rs = 0.1. It is generally realised that the imprinted polymer's recognition property is also very much influenced by the nature of the polymer network. It was shown that the recognition decreased with a decrease in the apparent degree of cross-linking (molar percentage of cross-linker in the polymerisation mixture). Nonetheless, our results show that in our optimised assay system a significant separation could still be obtained on a polymer which was only 22% cross-linked. We consider this to be of importance, since it may suggest a way of imprinting larger molecules because of the possibly improved mass transfer in low cross-linking density polymers. It was reported that when trifunctional cross-linkers [for example: trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate (TRIM)] were used as the cross-linker instead of EGDMA, considerably improved enantiomeric separation and resolving capability were observed. Our results show that the improved performance of the MAA-co-EGDMA MIPs is actually comparable to the performance of the MIPs prepared with those trifunctional cross-linkers. The combination of a hydrogen bonding functional monomer (acrylamide) with TRIM also did not give improved recognition. The results suggest that although the three-dimensional network of these two kinds of polymer may be quite different, the observed recognition improvements were probably largely due to solvent effect." @default.
• W2078718448 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2078718448 creator A5007955463 @default.
• W2078718448 creator A5069618596 @default.
• W2078718448 date "2000-08-01" @default.
• W2078718448 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2078718448 title "Influence of mobile phase composition and cross-linking density on the enantiomeric recognition properties of molecularly imprinted polymers" @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1499862875 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1535902400 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1576826440 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1967862345 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1979266807 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1982850178 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1985584940 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1986115459 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1988806907 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1996026948 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1997008091 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W1998994571 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2002623797 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2004155941 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2007854785 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2009618147 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2010407672 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2012996079 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2031855766 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2039450118 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2041365548 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2041381384 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2042616096 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2046838788 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2055039391 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2060657689 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2061119072 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2063836077 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2064844702 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2068537122 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2068628279 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2069443755 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2072064566 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2074812329 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2077083725 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2077686163 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2078623031 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2079633116 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2082356755 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2082582589 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2085790519 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2091561221 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2101479143 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2135183779 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2148845788 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2163763334 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2170417656 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W2314955984 @default.
• W2078718448 cites W4254870942 @default.
• W2078718448 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00556-2" @default.
• W2078718448 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10949473" @default.
• W2078718448 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2078718448 type Work @default.
• W2078718448 sameAs 2078718448 @default.
• W2078718448 citedByCount "133" @default.
• W2078718448 countsByYear W20787184482012 @default.
• W2078718448 countsByYear W20787184482013 @default.
• W2078718448 countsByYear W20787184482014 @default.
• W2078718448 countsByYear W20787184482015 @default.
• W2078718448 countsByYear W20787184482016 @default.
• W2078718448 countsByYear W20787184482017 @default.
• W2078718448 countsByYear W20787184482018 @default.
• W2078718448 countsByYear W20787184482020 @default.
• W2078718448 countsByYear W20787184482021 @default.
• W2078718448 countsByYear W20787184482023 @default.
• W2078718448 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2078718448 hasAuthorship W2078718448A5007955463 @default.
• W2078718448 hasAuthorship W2078718448A5069618596 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C118792377 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C15920480 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C161790260 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C162602672 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C179303850 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C179998833 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C2775968528 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C2777463227 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C2777516009 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C2779794448 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C2780471494 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C2781144210 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C32909587 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C44280652 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C486523 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConcept C521977710 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConceptScore W2078718448C118792377 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConceptScore W2078718448C15920480 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConceptScore W2078718448C161790260 @default.
• W2078718448 hasConceptScore W2078718448C162602672 @default.

• next