Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078772657> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 79 of
79
with 100 items per page.
- W2078772657 endingPage "1559" @default.
- W2078772657 startingPage "1555" @default.
- W2078772657 abstract "Purpose Orthognathic surgery is generally performed to correct facial abnormalities related to the maxilla and/or mandible, and there are a variety of reasons for which patients choose to be evaluated for this procedure. We surveyed 637 cases to determine the patients' motivating factors for seeking surgical consultation. Patients and Methods We reviewed 637 cases from 1990 to 2006 in this study, and data were extracted from 501 appropriately completed surveys to determine why patients seek corrective maxillofacial surgery. Patients aged under 12 years and those with an identified syndrome were not included in the final data set. Results The results indicate that patients with dentofacial deformities have multiple complaints related to their poor maxillomandibular relationships. However, their primary motivation for undergoing surgical evaluation is not appearance; it is their bite/function. Of the 501 patients reviewed in this study, 216 (43%) were male and 285 (57%) were female. Age ranged from 12 to 45 years. Of the patients, 76% stated that their appearance was affected by their condition, but only 15% stated it was their primary motivation for undergoing surgical evaluation. Thirty-six percent stated that their bite was their primary motivation for seeking treatment. Conclusion The most common reason for surgical evaluation was correction of bite or functional disability, not improvement of appearance. Most previously published studies on this subject included smaller sample sizes and showed appearance to be the primary motivating factor. Orthognathic surgery is generally performed to correct facial abnormalities related to the maxilla and/or mandible, and there are a variety of reasons for which patients choose to be evaluated for this procedure. We surveyed 637 cases to determine the patients' motivating factors for seeking surgical consultation. We reviewed 637 cases from 1990 to 2006 in this study, and data were extracted from 501 appropriately completed surveys to determine why patients seek corrective maxillofacial surgery. Patients aged under 12 years and those with an identified syndrome were not included in the final data set. The results indicate that patients with dentofacial deformities have multiple complaints related to their poor maxillomandibular relationships. However, their primary motivation for undergoing surgical evaluation is not appearance; it is their bite/function. Of the 501 patients reviewed in this study, 216 (43%) were male and 285 (57%) were female. Age ranged from 12 to 45 years. Of the patients, 76% stated that their appearance was affected by their condition, but only 15% stated it was their primary motivation for undergoing surgical evaluation. Thirty-six percent stated that their bite was their primary motivation for seeking treatment. The most common reason for surgical evaluation was correction of bite or functional disability, not improvement of appearance. Most previously published studies on this subject included smaller sample sizes and showed appearance to be the primary motivating factor." @default.
- W2078772657 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2078772657 creator A5027897289 @default.
- W2078772657 creator A5056581165 @default.
- W2078772657 creator A5075887064 @default.
- W2078772657 date "2010-07-01" @default.
- W2078772657 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
- W2078772657 title "Motivating Factors for Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery Evaluation" @default.
- W2078772657 cites W1978995831 @default.
- W2078772657 cites W1979341200 @default.
- W2078772657 cites W2006039756 @default.
- W2078772657 cites W2021758118 @default.
- W2078772657 cites W2028317921 @default.
- W2078772657 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.12.007" @default.
- W2078772657 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20434252" @default.
- W2078772657 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2078772657 type Work @default.
- W2078772657 sameAs 2078772657 @default.
- W2078772657 citedByCount "53" @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572012 @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572013 @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572014 @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572015 @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572016 @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572017 @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572018 @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572019 @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572020 @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572021 @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572022 @default.
- W2078772657 countsByYear W20787726572023 @default.
- W2078772657 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2078772657 hasAuthorship W2078772657A5027897289 @default.
- W2078772657 hasAuthorship W2078772657A5056581165 @default.
- W2078772657 hasAuthorship W2078772657A5075887064 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConcept C122246415 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConcept C157369684 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConcept C2776347944 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConcept C2779767645 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConcept C2908788423 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConceptScore W2078772657C122246415 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConceptScore W2078772657C141071460 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConceptScore W2078772657C157369684 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConceptScore W2078772657C199343813 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConceptScore W2078772657C2776347944 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConceptScore W2078772657C2779767645 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConceptScore W2078772657C2908788423 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConceptScore W2078772657C29694066 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConceptScore W2078772657C59822182 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConceptScore W2078772657C71924100 @default.
- W2078772657 hasConceptScore W2078772657C86803240 @default.
- W2078772657 hasIssue "7" @default.
- W2078772657 hasLocation W20787726571 @default.
- W2078772657 hasLocation W20787726572 @default.
- W2078772657 hasOpenAccess W2078772657 @default.
- W2078772657 hasPrimaryLocation W20787726571 @default.
- W2078772657 hasRelatedWork W2078859563 @default.
- W2078772657 hasRelatedWork W2186826866 @default.
- W2078772657 hasRelatedWork W2237590705 @default.
- W2078772657 hasRelatedWork W2336468362 @default.
- W2078772657 hasRelatedWork W2566876660 @default.
- W2078772657 hasRelatedWork W2770317802 @default.
- W2078772657 hasRelatedWork W2892281870 @default.
- W2078772657 hasRelatedWork W2939441541 @default.
- W2078772657 hasRelatedWork W3198167623 @default.
- W2078772657 hasRelatedWork W4205564448 @default.
- W2078772657 hasVolume "68" @default.
- W2078772657 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2078772657 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2078772657 magId "2078772657" @default.
- W2078772657 workType "article" @default.