FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078960613> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2078960613 endingPage "436" @default.
• W2078960613 startingPage "419" @default.
• W2078960613 abstract "Bilateral determinations of the blood pressures were made nonsimultaneously and simultaneously by the indirect method under basal conditions on 447 patients. In this group 26.6 per cent of the paired measurements by the nonsimultaneous indirect method exhibited systolic differences of 10 mm. Hg or greater and 15 per cent exhibited diastolic differences of this magnitude, whereas only 5.3 per cent of the measurements by the simultaneous indirect method had systolic differences and only 4 per cent had diastolic differences of this degree. This indicates that bilateral determinations of blood pressure must be performed simultaneously on patients being examined for possible inequalities of blood pressure. Bilateral differences in blood pressure obtained by the simultaneous indirect and simultaneous direct methods in 14 normal subjects and 53 selected patients were compared. In the normal subjects, 3 of the 42 paired indirect measurements and none of the paired direct measurements in either the radial or brachial arteries had systolic differences of 10 mm. Hg or greater, and none of the diastolic differences were of this level. In the 53 selected patients, 10 per cent of the indirect and 6 per cent of the direct measurements of systolic blood pressure differed by 10 mm. Hg or more and 8 per cent of the paired indirect measurements of diastolic blood pressure and less than 1 per cent of the paired direct measurements differed by this amount. These differences in bilateral blood pressures were characterized by their inconstancy and lack of agreement with subsequent measurements when studied by both the indirect and direct methods, which apparently separates them from those due to altered hemodynamics from pathologic conditions of the aortic arch or its tributaries. Bilateral differences of blood pressure are of clinical importance when they are great and are reproducible by the direct as well as by the indirect methods, as illustrated by a patient encountered in this study. In addition, 1 case of extreme obesity and 1 of advanced arteriosclerosis were reported. Both patients were found to have pseudohypertension, which was detected in this study. A slight increase in the incidence of bilateral differences in indirect blood pressures was found in a group of patients whose blood pressures were measured while they were in the supine and then in the sitting position. A slight increase in the incidence of bilateral differences was found at higher levels of blood pressure by comparing the blood pressures of nonhypertensive and hypertensive patients and of hypertensive patients before and during treatment with antihypertensive drugs. Bilateral inequalities of blood pressure did not appear to be related to the age or sex of the subjects. Likewise, differences in circumferences of the arm or right or left-handedness did not appear to influence these inequalities, and there was no marked side dominance for differences found. Bilaterally simultaneous, indirect measurements of blood pressure should be carried out on patients with hypertension who will be treated with antihypertensive drugs. Bilateral direct measurements may be used to verify the existence of inequality of blood pressures detected by the indirect method and to determine the correct pressure to be followed. This is particularly important in patients being screened for pheochromocytomas, since such differences may produce false-positive results." @default.
• W2078960613 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2078960613 creator A5007994462 @default.
• W2078960613 creator A5039876764 @default.
• W2078960613 creator A5083059023 @default.
• W2078960613 date "1960-09-01" @default.
• W2078960613 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2078960613 title "Bilateral Indirect and Direct Arterial Pressures" @default.
• W2078960613 cites W1569666904 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W1594559921 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W1976408459 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W1983240766 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W1995565047 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2007492922 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2056900472 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2059333474 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2062141787 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2065651892 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2075933182 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2090186216 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2114006479 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2323172613 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2333083554 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2344327454 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2975058625 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W2988207071 @default.
• W2078960613 cites W4251533078 @default.
• W2078960613 doi "https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.22.3.419" @default.
• W2078960613 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13711816" @default.
• W2078960613 hasPublicationYear "1960" @default.
• W2078960613 type Work @default.
• W2078960613 sameAs 2078960613 @default.
• W2078960613 citedByCount "85" @default.
• W2078960613 countsByYear W20789606132012 @default.
• W2078960613 countsByYear W20789606132013 @default.
• W2078960613 countsByYear W20789606132014 @default.
• W2078960613 countsByYear W20789606132015 @default.
• W2078960613 countsByYear W20789606132016 @default.
• W2078960613 countsByYear W20789606132017 @default.
• W2078960613 countsByYear W20789606132018 @default.
• W2078960613 countsByYear W20789606132019 @default.
• W2078960613 countsByYear W20789606132020 @default.
• W2078960613 countsByYear W20789606132021 @default.
• W2078960613 countsByYear W20789606132022 @default.
• W2078960613 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2078960613 hasAuthorship W2078960613A5007994462 @default.
• W2078960613 hasAuthorship W2078960613A5039876764 @default.
• W2078960613 hasAuthorship W2078960613A5083059023 @default.
• W2078960613 hasBestOaLocation W20789606131 @default.
• W2078960613 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2078960613 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2078960613 hasConcept C57900726 @default.
• W2078960613 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2078960613 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W2078960613 hasConceptScore W2078960613C126322002 @default.
• W2078960613 hasConceptScore W2078960613C164705383 @default.
• W2078960613 hasConceptScore W2078960613C57900726 @default.
• W2078960613 hasConceptScore W2078960613C71924100 @default.
• W2078960613 hasConceptScore W2078960613C84393581 @default.
• W2078960613 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2078960613 hasLocation W20789606131 @default.
• W2078960613 hasLocation W20789606132 @default.
• W2078960613 hasOpenAccess W2078960613 @default.
• W2078960613 hasPrimaryLocation W20789606131 @default.
• W2078960613 hasRelatedWork W105212061 @default.
• W2078960613 hasRelatedWork W1973271443 @default.
• W2078960613 hasRelatedWork W2069119436 @default.
• W2078960613 hasRelatedWork W2069439957 @default.
• W2078960613 hasRelatedWork W2292659277 @default.
• W2078960613 hasRelatedWork W2379190151 @default.
• W2078960613 hasRelatedWork W2786784362 @default.
• W2078960613 hasRelatedWork W4251000694 @default.
• W2078960613 hasRelatedWork W4361243003 @default.
• W2078960613 hasRelatedWork W195631407 @default.
• W2078960613 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W2078960613 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2078960613 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2078960613 magId "2078960613" @default.
• W2078960613 workType "article" @default.