FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2078996600> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2078996600 endingPage "177" @default.
• W2078996600 startingPage "170" @default.
• W2078996600 abstract "Aims This study was designed to evaluate the performance of an automated urinalysis system that utilised three commercially available instruments, the Clinitek Atlas, Sysmex UF-100 and the Alifax Uro-Quick. Methods The results of the automated system for 818 urine samples were compared with the results of manual processing which consisted of phase contrast microscopy, manual dipstick chemistry analysis and culture onto solid media. Results The correlation between the two methods for urine chemistry was excellent with a concordance of 89, 97, 100 and 98% for pH, blood, glucose and protein, respectively. The quantification of red blood cells and white blood cells had an R2 of 0.855 and 0.92, respectively. A difference scatter plot indicated a trend towards the manual cell count being greater than the UF-100 count as both the red and white blood cell count increased. There was 98% agreement between the automated process and manual culture. Conclusions The automated urinalysis system is fully integrated and allows for the cross-checking of urine chemistry and microscopy as well as electronic transfer of data. The automated process was used as a screening procedure and some manual testing was necessary. Automation of urinalysis offers a reduction in variation and has comparable results to manual testing. This study was designed to evaluate the performance of an automated urinalysis system that utilised three commercially available instruments, the Clinitek Atlas, Sysmex UF-100 and the Alifax Uro-Quick. The results of the automated system for 818 urine samples were compared with the results of manual processing which consisted of phase contrast microscopy, manual dipstick chemistry analysis and culture onto solid media. The correlation between the two methods for urine chemistry was excellent with a concordance of 89, 97, 100 and 98% for pH, blood, glucose and protein, respectively. The quantification of red blood cells and white blood cells had an R2 of 0.855 and 0.92, respectively. A difference scatter plot indicated a trend towards the manual cell count being greater than the UF-100 count as both the red and white blood cell count increased. There was 98% agreement between the automated process and manual culture. The automated urinalysis system is fully integrated and allows for the cross-checking of urine chemistry and microscopy as well as electronic transfer of data. The automated process was used as a screening procedure and some manual testing was necessary. Automation of urinalysis offers a reduction in variation and has comparable results to manual testing." @default.
• W2078996600 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2078996600 creator A5020679020 @default.
• W2078996600 creator A5080265748 @default.
• W2078996600 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W2078996600 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2078996600 title "Evaluation of an automated urinalysis system for testing urine chemistry, microscopy and culture" @default.
• W2078996600 cites W170031649 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W1971340920 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W2009847374 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W2034975749 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W2040432867 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W2044492186 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W2047974504 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W2052349452 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W2064199395 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W2124218038 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W2152716338 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W2157851441 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W2170826115 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W4239847265 @default.
• W2078996600 cites W4301796263 @default.
• W2078996600 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/003130201201117990" @default.
• W2078996600 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12009101" @default.
• W2078996600 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2078996600 type Work @default.
• W2078996600 sameAs 2078996600 @default.
• W2078996600 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2078996600 countsByYear W20789966002013 @default.
• W2078996600 countsByYear W20789966002016 @default.
• W2078996600 countsByYear W20789966002017 @default.
• W2078996600 countsByYear W20789966002020 @default.
• W2078996600 countsByYear W20789966002021 @default.
• W2078996600 countsByYear W20789966002023 @default.
• W2078996600 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2078996600 hasAuthorship W2078996600A5020679020 @default.
• W2078996600 hasAuthorship W2078996600A5080265748 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C115901376 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C2779225474 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C2780026642 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C2780327821 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C3019060180 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConcept C85135244 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C115901376 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C126322002 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C127413603 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C136229726 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C154945302 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C185592680 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C2779225474 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C2780026642 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C2780327821 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C3019060180 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C41008148 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C43617362 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C71924100 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C78519656 @default.
• W2078996600 hasConceptScore W2078996600C85135244 @default.
• W2078996600 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2078996600 hasLocation W20789966001 @default.
• W2078996600 hasLocation W20789966002 @default.
• W2078996600 hasOpenAccess W2078996600 @default.
• W2078996600 hasPrimaryLocation W20789966001 @default.
• W2078996600 hasRelatedWork W1895627670 @default.
• W2078996600 hasRelatedWork W20718797 @default.
• W2078996600 hasRelatedWork W2078996600 @default.
• W2078996600 hasRelatedWork W2159219977 @default.
• W2078996600 hasRelatedWork W2343608215 @default.
• W2078996600 hasRelatedWork W2364783452 @default.
• W2078996600 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2078996600 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2078996600 hasRelatedWork W4363650550 @default.
• W2078996600 hasRelatedWork W748146480 @default.
• W2078996600 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W2078996600 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2078996600 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2078996600 magId "2078996600" @default.
• W2078996600 workType "article" @default.