Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W207913127> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 78 of
78
with 100 items per page.
- W207913127 startingPage "1" @default.
- W207913127 abstract "This essay examines relationship between gift-giving and in texts about Oedipus complex. It argues in Henry James's novel What Maisie Knew and Wes Anderson's film Rushmore, a secondary repression is enabled by narrative techniques mobilize a collective act of forgetting through enjoyment of plot. ********** The small expanding consciousness would have to be saved, have to become presentable as a register of impressions; and saved by of certain advantages, by some enjoyed profit and some achieved confidence, rather than blurred, sterilized, by ignorance and pain. --Henry James, Preface to What Maisie Knew Max Fischer to Miss Cross: At least no one got hurt. Except you, she replies. Nah. I didn't get hurt bad.--Wes Anderson, Rushmore In a recent paper and deconstruction, Elizabeth Grosz suggests is the unspoken condition of a certain fantasy of sustainability of its various others or opposites, peace, love and so on (8). What Grosz is discussing here is relationship between deconstruction's interest in a certain foundational violence, arche-writing inscribes thing-in-itself into a system of representation, and a second, 'reparatory' or compensatory violence, whose function is to erase traces of this primordial violence (10)--the of law or of reason. The legitimating structures of law function in this paradigm as site of fantasy--that which enables us to engage in a collective act of forgetting about originary of representation itself. Narrative, especially a particular kind of narrative, functions as another such site of utopianist forgetting: story of end of childhood, and its denial of of Oedipus complex. In epigraphs above, two texts which take as their subject and theme loss of childhood innocence in resolution of Oedipus complex both deny pain of resolution for children involved. Not completely deny, of course: James leaves open possibility Maisie will perhaps be slightly coarsened, blurred, sterilized by pain of her ordeal, and Max admits to his adult love object only he was not hurt that bad. Nevertheless, denial remains--even as it is, necessarily, refracted, expressed, and resolved differently for boy and girl. Both authors implicitly argue regardless of a few bumps and bruises along way, everything turns out all right in end; as readers and viewers we are invited to these endings as restorative, even though both narratives have insisted quite strenuously pain and suffering--even to point of physical violence--endured by their main characters. Aside from their similar histories of violent repression, these central characters could not be more different. Where Maisie is (at least initially) befuddled and trusting, Max is shrewd and circumspect. Where Maisie enacts her creator's desire to explore a character who resist[s] [...] strain of observation and of experience (Maisie xi), Max is characterized early in film as someone who seem[s] to have it pretty figured out. Even more importantly, trajectory of each character's Oedipal drama is quite different, as Freud's discussion of gender difference in childhood psychosexual development would insist: this sexual difference, in fact, suggests an explanation for why Maisie resists assault of experience while Max embraces it. Yet two narratives also share a deeper affinity than a characterological sketch of their protagonists would allow. Both are concerned with power and powerlessness of children, and ways in which children negotiate and participate in adult violence. Both texts are utopianist wish-fulfilments enact certain fantasies of and about childhood. The first-order fantasy is wish of infantile/pubescent sexuality, child will somehow end up with his or her final (heterosexual) Oedipal object: Maisie will live happily ever after with Claude, and Max will . …" @default.
- W207913127 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W207913127 creator A5062715574 @default.
- W207913127 date "2005-06-01" @default.
- W207913127 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W207913127 title "What Maxie Knew: The Gift and Oedipus in What Maisie Knew and Rushmore" @default.
- W207913127 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W207913127 type Work @default.
- W207913127 sameAs 207913127 @default.
- W207913127 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W207913127 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W207913127 hasAuthorship W207913127A5062715574 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C138855539 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C167651023 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C2780492140 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C7149132 @default.
- W207913127 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C105795698 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C107038049 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C111472728 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C11171543 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C124952713 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C138855539 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C138885662 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C142362112 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C144024400 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C15744967 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C167651023 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C18903297 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C199033989 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C2780492140 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C33923547 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C41895202 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C7149132 @default.
- W207913127 hasConceptScore W207913127C86803240 @default.
- W207913127 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W207913127 hasLocation W2079131271 @default.
- W207913127 hasOpenAccess W207913127 @default.
- W207913127 hasPrimaryLocation W2079131271 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W111133085 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W129009537 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W155109776 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W166772029 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W1971250612 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W1983843238 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W2007571338 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W2054236170 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W2074014219 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W2237262545 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W2314566626 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W235569696 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W276333792 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W2971482523 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W316036921 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W777433212 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W113123525 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W2598897373 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W2603501170 @default.
- W207913127 hasRelatedWork W33411089 @default.
- W207913127 hasVolume "38" @default.
- W207913127 isParatext "false" @default.
- W207913127 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W207913127 magId "207913127" @default.
- W207913127 workType "article" @default.