FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079200380> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079200380 endingPage "921" @default.
• W2079200380 startingPage "917" @default.
• W2079200380 abstract "Background and Purpose: The metallic ureteral stent was first developed for patients with ureteral obstruction related to malignant disease, but it can be used in all patients needing chronic indwelling ureteral stents, including those with benign disease. The traditional method of polymer stent management often necessitates multiple exchanges per year depending on patient and logistical factors. This has significant direct financial cost and likely a negative effect on patients' overall health. The objective was to analyze and compare the costs associated with chronic indwelling metal and silicone-based ureteral stents. Patients and Methods: A prospective database of patients undergoing metal stent placement from February 2008 to June 2010 was reviewed. Mean charges for a single traditional nonmetal and metal stent insertion were calculated. Charges were based on direct hospital charges related to stent cost and surgery. Cost data were based on the fiscal year 2010 cost for polymer or metal stent insertions. Results: Twenty-one patients underwent metal stent placement at our institution. Of these, three traditional stent placements were omitted from analysis because of bundled charges for ureteroscopy at the same setting. Mean charges per single traditional and metal stent placement were $6072.75 and $9469.50, respectively. The estimated annual charges for traditional stents (3–6 exchanges) would be $18,218.25 to $36,436.50. Compared with metal stents, this is a potential financial savings of 48% to 74%. The mean direct cost to patients was 21.6% and 25.4% of the charges for metal and polymer stents, respectively. No patient needed early discontinuation of his or her metal stent because of lower urinatry tract symptoms or gross hematuria. Conclusions: Metal stents are well tolerated by patients with ureteral obstruction of various etiologies and provide a significant financial benefit compared with polymer ureteral stents. For patients who are not fit for surgical intervention regarding their ureteral occlusive disease, the metal Resonance stent is a financially advantageous and well-tolerated option." @default.
• W2079200380 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079200380 creator A5043054021 @default.
• W2079200380 creator A5080862833 @default.
• W2079200380 creator A5086310747 @default.
• W2079200380 date "2012-07-01" @default.
• W2079200380 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2079200380 title "Cost Analysis of Metallic Ureteral Stents with 12 Months of Follow-Up" @default.
• W2079200380 cites W1487552274 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W1582904572 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W1965398449 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W1969383656 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W1977431050 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W1980269829 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W1983087906 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W2011091606 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W2015579009 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W2045855752 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W2052448683 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W2079501535 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W2119365840 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W2151105626 @default.
• W2079200380 cites W2468691746 @default.
• W2079200380 doi "https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0481" @default.
• W2079200380 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22360415" @default.
• W2079200380 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2079200380 type Work @default.
• W2079200380 sameAs 2079200380 @default.
• W2079200380 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W2079200380 countsByYear W20792003802013 @default.
• W2079200380 countsByYear W20792003802014 @default.
• W2079200380 countsByYear W20792003802015 @default.
• W2079200380 countsByYear W20792003802016 @default.
• W2079200380 countsByYear W20792003802017 @default.
• W2079200380 countsByYear W20792003802018 @default.
• W2079200380 countsByYear W20792003802019 @default.
• W2079200380 countsByYear W20792003802021 @default.
• W2079200380 countsByYear W20792003802022 @default.
• W2079200380 countsByYear W20792003802023 @default.
• W2079200380 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079200380 hasAuthorship W2079200380A5043054021 @default.
• W2079200380 hasAuthorship W2079200380A5080862833 @default.
• W2079200380 hasAuthorship W2079200380A5086310747 @default.
• W2079200380 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2079200380 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
• W2079200380 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W2079200380 hasConcept C2780653459 @default.
• W2079200380 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2079200380 hasConceptScore W2079200380C141071460 @default.
• W2079200380 hasConceptScore W2079200380C2776664737 @default.
• W2079200380 hasConceptScore W2079200380C2778583881 @default.
• W2079200380 hasConceptScore W2079200380C2780653459 @default.
• W2079200380 hasConceptScore W2079200380C71924100 @default.
• W2079200380 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2079200380 hasLocation W20792003801 @default.
• W2079200380 hasLocation W20792003802 @default.
• W2079200380 hasOpenAccess W2079200380 @default.
• W2079200380 hasPrimaryLocation W20792003801 @default.
• W2079200380 hasRelatedWork W2374124747 @default.
• W2079200380 hasRelatedWork W2593011982 @default.
• W2079200380 hasRelatedWork W2766631057 @default.
• W2079200380 hasRelatedWork W2784151091 @default.
• W2079200380 hasRelatedWork W2806325714 @default.
• W2079200380 hasRelatedWork W2897536632 @default.
• W2079200380 hasRelatedWork W4210510816 @default.
• W2079200380 hasRelatedWork W4237899154 @default.
• W2079200380 hasRelatedWork W4296581813 @default.
• W2079200380 hasRelatedWork W4308319100 @default.
• W2079200380 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W2079200380 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2079200380 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2079200380 magId "2079200380" @default.
• W2079200380 workType "article" @default.