FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079412175> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079412175 endingPage "53" @default.
• W2079412175 startingPage "46" @default.
• W2079412175 abstract "The standard commercially available marketed prostheses sometimes may not be the best fit to Indian patients because of the large anatomic variation. Orthopedic surgeons always stress the need for a proper implant-patient match in hip joint replacements, in particular, for a cementless femoral stem. The complications of mismatch are aseptic loosening, improper load distribution, and discomfort. The present study was undertaken to compare the differences in dimensions between femurs of elderly Indians and those of populations from other regions in order to solve the problem of a possible geometric mismatch between a selected implant and the hip joint as far as Indian patients are concerned.Measurements were made using computer aided design techniques on computed tomography (CT) scanned images of 98 femurs (56 left and 42 right). The software used to convert the CT images into solid models was MIMICS(®) (Materialize, Inc., Leuven, Belgium). The geometrical parameters, viz., the femoral head offset, femoral head center (HC), femoral head diameter, femoral head relative position, position of shaft isthmus, neck-shaft angle, bow angle, femoral neck length, canal flare index, femoral length, and canal width at various locations, were chosen to design best-fit standard femoral stems for cementless insertion. These data were compared with the published data of other countries.A difference of 16.8% was found in the femoral head offset between Indian and Swiss populations, which can affect soft tissue tension and range of motion. At a distance of 20 mm above the lesser trochanter (LT), the anteroposterior (AP) canal width was found to differ by 45.4%, when compared with a French population which can affect the mechanical stability of femoral stem. Femoral dimensions of Indian male and female subjects have also been compared and differences evaluated. At the LT, the aspect ratio (ratio of mediolateral canal width and AP canal width) in case of males (1.198) is approximately13% higher than that of females (1.059).This study indicates a need for redesign of femoral stems. The obtained anthropometric femoral dimensions can be used to design and develop indigenous hip joint prosthesis in India. The results of this study can also be used in forensic anthropometric studies." @default.
• W2079412175 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079412175 creator A5009256070 @default.
• W2079412175 creator A5036358516 @default.
• W2079412175 creator A5045196748 @default.
• W2079412175 creator A5074281871 @default.
• W2079412175 date "2012-02-01" @default.
• W2079412175 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2079412175 title "Anthropometric measurements to design best-fit femoral stem for the Indian population" @default.
• W2079412175 cites W1958380829 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W1966763917 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W1969952954 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W1969960011 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W1985033485 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W1996861604 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2000539004 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2005772963 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2029888636 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2033854761 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2041313963 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2046829136 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2074933814 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2086823173 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2088399500 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2089452224 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2096582750 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2116483189 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2118630903 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2147624557 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2157558028 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2165949000 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W2296076797 @default.
• W2079412175 cites W4248894144 @default.
• W2079412175 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91634" @default.
• W2079412175 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3270605" @default.
• W2079412175 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22345806" @default.
• W2079412175 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2079412175 type Work @default.
• W2079412175 sameAs 2079412175 @default.
• W2079412175 citedByCount "47" @default.
• W2079412175 countsByYear W20794121752013 @default.
• W2079412175 countsByYear W20794121752014 @default.
• W2079412175 countsByYear W20794121752015 @default.
• W2079412175 countsByYear W20794121752016 @default.
• W2079412175 countsByYear W20794121752017 @default.
• W2079412175 countsByYear W20794121752018 @default.
• W2079412175 countsByYear W20794121752019 @default.
• W2079412175 countsByYear W20794121752020 @default.
• W2079412175 countsByYear W20794121752021 @default.
• W2079412175 countsByYear W20794121752022 @default.
• W2079412175 countsByYear W20794121752023 @default.
• W2079412175 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079412175 hasAuthorship W2079412175A5009256070 @default.
• W2079412175 hasAuthorship W2079412175A5036358516 @default.
• W2079412175 hasAuthorship W2079412175A5045196748 @default.
• W2079412175 hasAuthorship W2079412175A5074281871 @default.
• W2079412175 hasBestOaLocation W20794121752 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C2775854910 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C2776541429 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C2778375840 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C2779100257 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C2780554211 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C2781041657 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C2909389717 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C134018914 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C141071460 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C199343813 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C2775854910 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C2776541429 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C2778375840 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C2779100257 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C2780554211 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C2781041657 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C2909389717 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C29694066 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C68312169 @default.
• W2079412175 hasConceptScore W2079412175C71924100 @default.
• W2079412175 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2079412175 hasLocation W20794121751 @default.
• W2079412175 hasLocation W20794121752 @default.
• W2079412175 hasLocation W20794121753 @default.
• W2079412175 hasLocation W20794121754 @default.
• W2079412175 hasOpenAccess W2079412175 @default.
• W2079412175 hasPrimaryLocation W20794121751 @default.
• W2079412175 hasRelatedWork W1591417560 @default.
• W2079412175 hasRelatedWork W2044769722 @default.
• W2079412175 hasRelatedWork W2345688496 @default.
• W2079412175 hasRelatedWork W2351383154 @default.
• W2079412175 hasRelatedWork W2355829502 @default.
• W2079412175 hasRelatedWork W2370266664 @default.
• W2079412175 hasRelatedWork W2403414635 @default.
• W2079412175 hasRelatedWork W2528509891 @default.

• next