FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079461583> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079461583 endingPage "585" @default.
• W2079461583 startingPage "585" @default.
• W2079461583 abstract "Purpose. This study investigated the surfaces produced on 2 commonly used heat-cured acrylic resins by 2 chairside polishing systems compared to conventional lathe polishing. It used energy dispersive analysis (EDA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate the abrasive materials bonded in the silicone points that are marketed for chairside polishing of acrylic resin.Materials and Methods. Using the 3 polishing systems (conventional as control, Shofu acrylic polishing system [AcryPoint], and Kenda Queen silicone polisher), 3 operators polished specimens using a defined protocol. Specimens were subjected to SEM and confocal microscopy. EDA was undertaken on the silicone polishing points.Results. Conventional polishing produced the superior surface, followed by the surfaces produced by the Shofu system and then Kenda Queen. However, both chairside polishing systems produced smoother surfaces on acrylic resin than the surfaces produced by either steel or tungsten carbide burs. Both the Shofu acrylic polishing system and Kenda Queen silicone polisher contain beads of cerium, which is widely used in industry for polishing of glass.Conclusion. Silicone polishing points marketed for polishing of acrylic resin could be used to produce smooth surfaces that have been adjusted with burs where there is no access to a laboratory lathe.—Reprinted with permission of Quintessence Publishing. Purpose. This study investigated the surfaces produced on 2 commonly used heat-cured acrylic resins by 2 chairside polishing systems compared to conventional lathe polishing. It used energy dispersive analysis (EDA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate the abrasive materials bonded in the silicone points that are marketed for chairside polishing of acrylic resin. Materials and Methods. Using the 3 polishing systems (conventional as control, Shofu acrylic polishing system [AcryPoint], and Kenda Queen silicone polisher), 3 operators polished specimens using a defined protocol. Specimens were subjected to SEM and confocal microscopy. EDA was undertaken on the silicone polishing points. Results. Conventional polishing produced the superior surface, followed by the surfaces produced by the Shofu system and then Kenda Queen. However, both chairside polishing systems produced smoother surfaces on acrylic resin than the surfaces produced by either steel or tungsten carbide burs. Both the Shofu acrylic polishing system and Kenda Queen silicone polisher contain beads of cerium, which is widely used in industry for polishing of glass. Conclusion. Silicone polishing points marketed for polishing of acrylic resin could be used to produce smooth surfaces that have been adjusted with burs where there is no access to a laboratory lathe.—Reprinted with permission of Quintessence Publishing." @default.
• W2079461583 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079461583 creator A5036400588 @default.
• W2079461583 creator A5037493953 @default.
• W2079461583 creator A5048996915 @default.
• W2079461583 creator A5090479497 @default.
• W2079461583 date "2003-12-01" @default.
• W2079461583 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2079461583 title "Chairside polishing of heat-cured acrylic resin: An SEM and EDA study" @default.
• W2079461583 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.014" @default.
• W2079461583 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2079461583 type Work @default.
• W2079461583 sameAs 2079461583 @default.
• W2079461583 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2079461583 countsByYear W20794615832015 @default.
• W2079461583 countsByYear W20794615832016 @default.
• W2079461583 countsByYear W20794615832017 @default.
• W2079461583 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079461583 hasAuthorship W2079461583A5036400588 @default.
• W2079461583 hasAuthorship W2079461583A5037493953 @default.
• W2079461583 hasAuthorship W2079461583A5048996915 @default.
• W2079461583 hasAuthorship W2079461583A5090479497 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConcept C138113353 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConcept C140013486 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConcept C26771246 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConcept C2779769944 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConcept C2780957350 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConcept C2781448156 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConceptScore W2079461583C138113353 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConceptScore W2079461583C140013486 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConceptScore W2079461583C159985019 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConceptScore W2079461583C192562407 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConceptScore W2079461583C26771246 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConceptScore W2079461583C2779769944 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConceptScore W2079461583C2780957350 @default.
• W2079461583 hasConceptScore W2079461583C2781448156 @default.
• W2079461583 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2079461583 hasLocation W20794615831 @default.
• W2079461583 hasOpenAccess W2079461583 @default.
• W2079461583 hasPrimaryLocation W20794615831 @default.
• W2079461583 hasRelatedWork W1484694197 @default.
• W2079461583 hasRelatedWork W1512319868 @default.
• W2079461583 hasRelatedWork W2002336799 @default.
• W2079461583 hasRelatedWork W2276518112 @default.
• W2079461583 hasRelatedWork W2350788010 @default.
• W2079461583 hasRelatedWork W2351696714 @default.
• W2079461583 hasRelatedWork W2387616028 @default.
• W2079461583 hasRelatedWork W2790593562 @default.
• W2079461583 hasRelatedWork W3198229426 @default.
• W2079461583 hasRelatedWork W4310180239 @default.
• W2079461583 hasVolume "90" @default.
• W2079461583 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2079461583 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2079461583 magId "2079461583" @default.
• W2079461583 workType "article" @default.