FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079541648> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079541648 endingPage "623" @default.
• W2079541648 startingPage "619" @default.
• W2079541648 abstract "Background context In the prehospital stages of emergency care, cervical collars are (supposedly) used to aid rescuers in maintaining in-line stabilization of the spinal column as patients with potential or actual injuries are shifted onto a spine board to achieve full spinal immobilization. Unfortunately, not a single study has examined the effectiveness of cervical collars to control motion during the execution of spine-board transfer techniques. Purpose To evaluate the controlling effect of three cervical collars during the execution of spine-board transfer techniques. Study design This was a repeated measures investigation in which a cadaveric model was used to test the effectiveness of the Ambu (Ambu, Inc., Linthicum, MD), Aspen (Aspen Medical Products, Inc., Long Beach, CA) and Miami J (Jerome Medical, Moorestown, NJ) collars during the execution of the log-roll (LR) maneuver and the lift-and-slide (LS) technique. Methods Six medical professionals executed the LR and the LS on five cadavers. An electromagnetic tracking device was used to capture angular movements generated at the C5–C6 vertebral segment during the execution of both transfer techniques. The types of motion that were analyzed in this study were flexion-extension, lateral flexion and axial rotation motion. To test the three cervical collars, an experimental lesion (ie, a complete segmental instability) was created at the aforementioned spinal level of the cadavers and sensors from the electromagnetic tracking device were affixed to the specified vertebrae to record the motion generated at the site of the lesion. Results Statistical tests did not reveal a significant interaction between the independent variables of this study (ie, transfer technique and collar type), lending no support to the notion that there may be a combination of collar and transfer technique that could theoretically offer added protection to the patient. Although there was a decrease in the amount of motion generated in every one of the planes of motion as a result of wearing each of the three collars, none of the changes that emerged proved to be significantly different. A significant difference was noted between the LR and LS techniques when the amount of lateral flexion and axial rotation motion generated with each of the procedures were compared. In both cases, execution of the LR maneuver resulted in significantly more motion. Conclusions The data presented here suggest that the collars tested in this study are functionally similar. It is recommended that this study be repeated with a larger sample size." @default.
• W2079541648 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079541648 creator A5018588852 @default.
• W2079541648 creator A5061796850 @default.
• W2079541648 creator A5062564113 @default.
• W2079541648 creator A5086563883 @default.
• W2079541648 date "2004-11-01" @default.
• W2079541648 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2079541648 title "The effectiveness of extrication collars tested during the execution of spine-board transfer techniques" @default.
• W2079541648 cites W1965760787 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W1979958550 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W1989435076 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W2031057173 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W2039511155 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W2057641848 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W2068340137 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W2076011880 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W2076910358 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W2099480791 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W2161224560 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W2169498194 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W2573045732 @default.
• W2079541648 cites W2790137846 @default.
• W2079541648 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.06.018" @default.
• W2079541648 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15541692" @default.
• W2079541648 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2079541648 type Work @default.
• W2079541648 sameAs 2079541648 @default.
• W2079541648 citedByCount "63" @default.
• W2079541648 countsByYear W20795416482012 @default.
• W2079541648 countsByYear W20795416482013 @default.
• W2079541648 countsByYear W20795416482014 @default.
• W2079541648 countsByYear W20795416482015 @default.
• W2079541648 countsByYear W20795416482016 @default.
• W2079541648 countsByYear W20795416482017 @default.
• W2079541648 countsByYear W20795416482018 @default.
• W2079541648 countsByYear W20795416482019 @default.
• W2079541648 countsByYear W20795416482020 @default.
• W2079541648 countsByYear W20795416482021 @default.
• W2079541648 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079541648 hasAuthorship W2079541648A5018588852 @default.
• W2079541648 hasAuthorship W2079541648A5061796850 @default.
• W2079541648 hasAuthorship W2079541648A5062564113 @default.
• W2079541648 hasAuthorship W2079541648A5086563883 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConcept C2776944266 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConcept C2985379065 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConceptScore W2079541648C127313418 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConceptScore W2079541648C141071460 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConceptScore W2079541648C151730666 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConceptScore W2079541648C175696284 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConceptScore W2079541648C2776944266 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConceptScore W2079541648C2779343474 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConceptScore W2079541648C29694066 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConceptScore W2079541648C2985379065 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConceptScore W2079541648C71924100 @default.
• W2079541648 hasConceptScore W2079541648C91762617 @default.
• W2079541648 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2079541648 hasLocation W20795416481 @default.
• W2079541648 hasLocation W20795416482 @default.
• W2079541648 hasOpenAccess W2079541648 @default.
• W2079541648 hasPrimaryLocation W20795416481 @default.
• W2079541648 hasRelatedWork W1541466234 @default.
• W2079541648 hasRelatedWork W1986416921 @default.
• W2079541648 hasRelatedWork W2046735784 @default.
• W2079541648 hasRelatedWork W2055297836 @default.
• W2079541648 hasRelatedWork W2166606602 @default.
• W2079541648 hasRelatedWork W2167991062 @default.
• W2079541648 hasRelatedWork W2762258464 @default.
• W2079541648 hasRelatedWork W4213364462 @default.
• W2079541648 hasRelatedWork W4289100771 @default.
• W2079541648 hasRelatedWork W4297254905 @default.
• W2079541648 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W2079541648 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2079541648 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2079541648 magId "2079541648" @default.
• W2079541648 workType "article" @default.