FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079587760> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079587760 endingPage "40" @default.
• W2079587760 startingPage "39" @default.
• W2079587760 abstract "The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, Psychinfo, Ingenta and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched, along with the reference lists from relevant articles. The authors of eligible trials were contacted to identify further studies and obtain additional information. Four journals were searched by hand (Journal of Health Psychology, Psychology and Health, Psychology Health and Medicine, Health Psychology – Update). No language restriction was applied. Randomised controlled trials were selected that tested the effectiveness of interventions based on psychological models, comparing them with educational, attention or no active intervention controls, to improve adherence to oral hygiene in adults with either gingivitis or periodontitis. Only trials with at least 3 weeks' followup were included. Interventions aimed at encouraging smoking cessation were not included. Titles and abstracts of studies that were potentially relevant to the review were independently screened by two review authors. Those that were clearly ineligible were rejected. For the remaining studies, the full paper was reviewed by two review authors and, where necessary, further information was sought from the author to verify eligibility. The quality of included studies was assessed using standard criteria. Four studies (of 344 participants) were found in which a psychological model or theory had been explicitly used as the basis for the design of the intervention. The overall quality of trials was low. Because of the heterogeneity of studies, both in terms of outcome measures and psychological models adopted, a meta-analysis was not possible. The four studies adopted four different theoretical frameworks, although there was some overlap in that three of the studies incorporated elements of Operant and Classical Conditioning. Psychological interventions resulted in improved plaque scores compared with no-intervention groups, and in one study compared with an attention control group. One study found decreased gingival bleeding in the active intervention group but no change in pocket depth or attachment loss after 4 months. Psychological interventions were associated with improved self-reported brushing and flossing in both the studies that assessed these behaviours. Only one study explored the impact of psychological interventions on beliefs and attitudes: the psychological intervention, when compared with educational and no-intervention controls, showed improved self-efficacy beliefs in relation to flossing, but no effect on dental knowledge or self-efficacy beliefs in relation to tooth brushing. There is some evidence from low-quality studies that psychological approaches to behaviour management, such as the use of reinforcement, goal setting and the provision of feedback, can improve oral hygiene and oral hygiene-related behaviours. The design of the interventions was weak and limited, however, and ignored key aspects of the theories. All the studies reported here also relied upon the provision of guidance by personnel other than the practitioner. There is no evidence that the use of such an approach by the practitioner with his or her patients would be beneficial. Thus, there is a need for greater methodological rigour in the design of trials in this area." @default.
• W2079587760 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079587760 creator A5023419142 @default.
• W2079587760 date "2007-06-01" @default.
• W2079587760 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2079587760 title "Psychological approaches may improve oral hygiene behaviour" @default.
• W2079587760 cites W135937561 @default.
• W2079587760 cites W2021768778 @default.
• W2079587760 cites W2107731553 @default.
• W2079587760 cites W2140162854 @default.
• W2079587760 cites W4252960946 @default.
• W2079587760 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400487" @default.
• W2079587760 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17589482" @default.
• W2079587760 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2079587760 type Work @default.
• W2079587760 sameAs 2079587760 @default.
• W2079587760 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2079587760 countsByYear W20795877602013 @default.
• W2079587760 countsByYear W20795877602016 @default.
• W2079587760 countsByYear W20795877602019 @default.
• W2079587760 countsByYear W20795877602020 @default.
• W2079587760 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079587760 hasAuthorship W2079587760A5023419142 @default.
• W2079587760 hasBestOaLocation W20795877601 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C515851188 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C118552586 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C126322002 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C141071460 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C15744967 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C168563851 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C17744445 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C199343813 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C199539241 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C27415008 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C2779473830 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C2780665704 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C512399662 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C515851188 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C70410870 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C71924100 @default.
• W2079587760 hasConceptScore W2079587760C95190672 @default.
• W2079587760 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2079587760 hasLocation W20795877601 @default.
• W2079587760 hasLocation W20795877602 @default.
• W2079587760 hasOpenAccess W2079587760 @default.
• W2079587760 hasPrimaryLocation W20795877601 @default.
• W2079587760 hasRelatedWork W1967911880 @default.
• W2079587760 hasRelatedWork W2344288903 @default.
• W2079587760 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2079587760 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2079587760 hasRelatedWork W2999457677 @default.
• W2079587760 hasRelatedWork W3159250744 @default.
• W2079587760 hasRelatedWork W4221062712 @default.
• W2079587760 hasRelatedWork W4256514411 @default.
• W2079587760 hasRelatedWork W4292236216 @default.
• W2079587760 hasRelatedWork W2903040050 @default.
• W2079587760 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W2079587760 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2079587760 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2079587760 magId "2079587760" @default.
• W2079587760 workType "article" @default.