FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079678622> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079678622 endingPage "1250" @default.
• W2079678622 startingPage "1241" @default.
• W2079678622 abstract "ObjectiveUnicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) has important advantages over total knee replacement (TKR) but has a higher revision rate. Outcomes vary between centres, suggesting that risk factors for revision may be modifiable with changes to patient selection or operative technique. The objective of this study was to determine factors affecting revision, patient-reported outcome and satisfaction following UKR.Method25,982 cases from three national databases were analysed. Multilevel multivariable regression models were used to examine the effect of patient and surgical factors on implant survival, patient-reported outcome and satisfaction at 6 months and 8 years following UKR.ResultsOf the 25,982 cases, 3862 (14.9%) had pre-operative and 6-month Oxford Knee Scores (OKS). Eight-year survival was 89.1% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 88.3–89.9). OKS increased from 21.9 (SD 7.6) to 37.5 (SD 9.5). Age (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.96 (95% CI 0.96–0.97) per year), male gender (HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.96)), unit size (HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.86–0.97) per case up to 40 cases/year) and operating surgeon grade (HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.67–0.91) if consultant) predicted improved implant survival. Older patients (≥75 years), and those with lower deprivation levels had superior OKS and satisfaction (adjusted mean difference 0.14 (95% CI 0.09–0.20) points per year of age and 0.93 (95% CI 0.60–1.27) per quintile of deprivation). Ethnicity, anxiety and co-morbidities also affected patient-reported outcome.ConclusionsThis study has identified important predictors of revision and patient-reported outcome following UKR. Older patients, who are least likely to be offered UKR, may derive the greatest benefits. Improved understanding of these factors may improve the long-term outcomes of UKR. Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) has important advantages over total knee replacement (TKR) but has a higher revision rate. Outcomes vary between centres, suggesting that risk factors for revision may be modifiable with changes to patient selection or operative technique. The objective of this study was to determine factors affecting revision, patient-reported outcome and satisfaction following UKR. 25,982 cases from three national databases were analysed. Multilevel multivariable regression models were used to examine the effect of patient and surgical factors on implant survival, patient-reported outcome and satisfaction at 6 months and 8 years following UKR. Of the 25,982 cases, 3862 (14.9%) had pre-operative and 6-month Oxford Knee Scores (OKS). Eight-year survival was 89.1% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 88.3–89.9). OKS increased from 21.9 (SD 7.6) to 37.5 (SD 9.5). Age (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.96 (95% CI 0.96–0.97) per year), male gender (HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.96)), unit size (HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.86–0.97) per case up to 40 cases/year) and operating surgeon grade (HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.67–0.91) if consultant) predicted improved implant survival. Older patients (≥75 years), and those with lower deprivation levels had superior OKS and satisfaction (adjusted mean difference 0.14 (95% CI 0.09–0.20) points per year of age and 0.93 (95% CI 0.60–1.27) per quintile of deprivation). Ethnicity, anxiety and co-morbidities also affected patient-reported outcome. This study has identified important predictors of revision and patient-reported outcome following UKR. Older patients, who are least likely to be offered UKR, may derive the greatest benefits. Improved understanding of these factors may improve the long-term outcomes of UKR." @default.
• W2079678622 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079678622 creator A5000914971 @default.
• W2079678622 creator A5014526832 @default.
• W2079678622 creator A5058622525 @default.
• W2079678622 creator A5067716277 @default.
• W2079678622 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W2079678622 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2079678622 title "Determinants of revision and functional outcome following unicompartmental knee replacement" @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1484989303 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1515620718 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1546299776 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1549748060 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1828646189 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1965270319 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1977806128 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1978615845 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1986537425 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1990329716 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1996870701 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W1997028943 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2002803325 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2016232567 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2018216849 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2019395441 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2022295588 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2024594564 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2034606562 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2038981426 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2042804722 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2046744127 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2048525801 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2051318476 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2059036727 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2061623382 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2064799866 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2068554269 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2076664630 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2093429239 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2105087430 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2106416340 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2116685625 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2140130289 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2145021550 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2148306825 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2178183257 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W2473786944 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W4213231055 @default.
• W2079678622 cites W4246789830 @default.
• W2079678622 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.07.006" @default.
• W2079678622 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4164911" @default.
• W2079678622 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25042552" @default.
• W2079678622 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2079678622 type Work @default.
• W2079678622 sameAs 2079678622 @default.
• W2079678622 citedByCount "56" @default.
• W2079678622 countsByYear W20796786222015 @default.
• W2079678622 countsByYear W20796786222016 @default.
• W2079678622 countsByYear W20796786222017 @default.
• W2079678622 countsByYear W20796786222018 @default.
• W2079678622 countsByYear W20796786222019 @default.
• W2079678622 countsByYear W20796786222020 @default.
• W2079678622 countsByYear W20796786222021 @default.
• W2079678622 countsByYear W20796786222022 @default.
• W2079678622 countsByYear W20796786222023 @default.
• W2079678622 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079678622 hasAuthorship W2079678622A5000914971 @default.
• W2079678622 hasAuthorship W2079678622A5014526832 @default.
• W2079678622 hasAuthorship W2079678622A5058622525 @default.
• W2079678622 hasAuthorship W2079678622A5067716277 @default.
• W2079678622 hasBestOaLocation W20796786221 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C207103383 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C2778104916 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C2780463824 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C50382708 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConceptScore W2079678622C118552586 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConceptScore W2079678622C126322002 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConceptScore W2079678622C141071460 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConceptScore W2079678622C142724271 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConceptScore W2079678622C1862650 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConceptScore W2079678622C204787440 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConceptScore W2079678622C207103383 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConceptScore W2079678622C2776164576 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConceptScore W2079678622C2778104916 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConceptScore W2079678622C2778336525 @default.
• W2079678622 hasConceptScore W2079678622C2780463824 @default.

• next