FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079681330> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079681330 endingPage "115" @default.
• W2079681330 startingPage "101" @default.
• W2079681330 abstract "Though scholars have long noted that the languages of J.R.R. Tolkien's Rohan and Anglo-Saxon England are pretty much identical, they have until recently hesitated to examine other parallels between the fictional and historical cultures—or for that matter, between The Lord of the Rings and Anglo-Saxon literature.1 I suspect this reluctance stems at least partly from Tolkien's own claim that his use of the Anglo-Saxon language in The Two Towers did not imply that the Rohirrim closely resembled the ancient English otherwise, in culture or art, in weapons or modes of warfare, except in a general way2 (RK, VI, Appendix F, 414), and it is true that even a less-than-rigorous reading of the The Lord of the Rings will reveal any number of anachronisms and inconsistencies that defeat easy allegorical translations of Third Age Rohan into, say, eighth-century Mercia. However, as Tom Shippey has noted in his J.R.R. Tolkien: Author of the Century, upon more careful examination Tolkien's merely linguistic appropriation of Anglo-Saxon England in The Lord of the Rings appears to [run] very deep (91). Shippey argues that the Rohirrim present a specific image of Englishness—Old English, of course(91) and that this Old Englishness stems from not just a linguistic but also a literary source: the underlying model for much of what [The Riders of Rohan] do and how they behave is furthermore perfectly obviously the Old English epic of Beowulf(94). I would like to extend Shippey's examination of the similarities between The Two Towers and Beowulf—which he mostly limits to a convincing demonstration of the close parallels between the treatment of the fragmented Fellowship upon its arrival at Edoras and Beowulf's at Heorot.3 I'd suggest that the Rohan episode's parallels with Beowulf run even deeper; that in fact the Fellowship and Beowulf step into strikingly similar situations. In both, an elderly king barely manages a precarious grip upon his throne; in both, the king is possessed of a nephew perceived (at least by some) as treacherous and potentially usurping; in both, a close female relative of the king's is married to a neighboring lord; in both, the kingdom's borders are troubled by threats of war the king cannot adequately address. These similarities have been mostly overlooked due to some equally striking differences. For example, unlike Beowulf's Denmark, in Tolkien's Rohan there lurk no monsters. Though such creatures are not far to seek [End Page 101] in most of Middle-earth, no grimma gæst stalks the moors surrounding Meduseld. Since Grendel, his mother and the dragon serve as Beowulf's primary antagonists and their attacks provide most of the narrative impetus for Beowulf, their absence from the Riddermark tends, I think, to obscure the similarities between the texts. Of course, another significant difference between the works is how these initially unpromising situations resolve themselves. For Beowulf's Danes, doom beckons. The Geatish hero's epic fortitudo cannot save Hrothgar from senescence or Heorot from flames, nor can it prevent the ambiguous4 Hrothulf from ascending (perhaps illegitimately) to the Danish throne or the peace woven by Freawaru's marriage from unraveling. Indeed, Tolkien saw Beowulf as an heroic-elegiac poem . . . all its first 3,136 lines are a prelude to a dirge (MC 31). In the Lord of the Rings, however, the similarly unpromising state of Rohan is somehow redeemed. The Fellowship rescues Théoden from dotage and reconciles him to his nephew Éomer, Saruman's encroaching orcs are defeated, and Éowyn (after escaping the attentions of Gríma) marries Faramir in a nuptial that cements the previously wary alliance of Gondor and Rohan. Of course, any attempt to address the similarities between Beowulf and The Two Towers should probably attempt to account for the differences, and I think that both can best be understood..." @default.
• W2079681330 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079681330 creator A5023934402 @default.
• W2079681330 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W2079681330 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2079681330 title "Beowulf as Fairy-story: Enchanting the Elegiac in The Two Towers" @default.
• W2079681330 cites W1546514714 @default.
• W2079681330 cites W1602237875 @default.
• W2079681330 cites W2009191836 @default.
• W2079681330 cites W2055287950 @default.
• W2079681330 cites W2073741711 @default.
• W2079681330 cites W2092889399 @default.
• W2079681330 cites W2137616909 @default.
• W2079681330 cites W2511429651 @default.
• W2079681330 cites W627689982 @default.
• W2079681330 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/tks.2006.0015" @default.
• W2079681330 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2079681330 type Work @default.
• W2079681330 sameAs 2079681330 @default.
• W2079681330 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2079681330 countsByYear W20796813302013 @default.
• W2079681330 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079681330 hasAuthorship W2079681330A5023934402 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C115519274 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C2775922551 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C2776931063 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C2779225839 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C36597679 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C64280408 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C115519274 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C124952713 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C127413603 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C138885662 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C142362112 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C164913051 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C17744445 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C199539241 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C2775922551 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C2776931063 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C2779225839 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C36597679 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C41895202 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C64280408 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C78519656 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C94625758 @default.
• W2079681330 hasConceptScore W2079681330C95457728 @default.
• W2079681330 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2079681330 hasLocation W20796813301 @default.
• W2079681330 hasOpenAccess W2079681330 @default.
• W2079681330 hasPrimaryLocation W20796813301 @default.
• W2079681330 hasRelatedWork W2067835865 @default.
• W2079681330 hasRelatedWork W2079681330 @default.
• W2079681330 hasRelatedWork W2361568350 @default.
• W2079681330 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2079681330 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2079681330 hasRelatedWork W2899339831 @default.
• W2079681330 hasRelatedWork W2949522452 @default.
• W2079681330 hasRelatedWork W3007205778 @default.
• W2079681330 hasRelatedWork W420803121 @default.
• W2079681330 hasRelatedWork W608430608 @default.
• W2079681330 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2079681330 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2079681330 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2079681330 magId "2079681330" @default.
• W2079681330 workType "article" @default.