FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079683422> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079683422 endingPage "147" @default.
• W2079683422 startingPage "138" @default.
• W2079683422 abstract "This special issue of Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice (also released as a book: ISBN 978-1-921348-31-0) will explore some empirical and analytic connections between creative industries and innovation policy. Seven papers are presented. The first four are empirical, providing analysis of large and/or detailed data sets on creative industries businesses and occupations to discern their contribution to innovation. The next three papers focus on comparative and historical policy analysis, connecting creative industries policy (broadly considered, including media, arts and cultural policy) and innovation policy. To introduce this special issue I want to review the arguments connecting the statistical, conceptual and policy neologism of 'creative industries' to: (1) the elements of a national innovation system; and (2) to innovation policy. In approaching this connection, two overarching issues arise.The first relates to the rise of the creative industries. What are they, what special significance do they have, if any, and furthermore, why now? Much of the answer turns on several ongoing apparent transformations in the technological and industrial composition of modern economies. This is the rise of the 'post-industrial society' (Bell 1973) and the 'knowledge-based economy' (OECD 1996), the systematic growth of the service sector, the rise of what Richard Florida (2002) calls the 'creative class', and so forth. And amidst this we also have the rise of the 'creative industries', an industrial re-classification first introduced by the UK government's Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS 1998). These trends all point in the same direction of a shifting knowledge-base of modern economies. In this view more and greater value issues from businesses and markets in the media, arts, cultural and experience industries. Recent decades have witnessed a period of global structural change in economic systems marked by the sustained rise of the creative industries as a source of employment, exports and value added (DCMS 2006). Proponents of 'creative industries' argue that this rise in economic significance should map to a rise in policy significance. Despite economists lining up to declaim this non sequitur, the issue has gathered a considerable policy traction, as many regions and nations seek to develop a 'creative industries strategy' and to build 'creative industries policy'.A second issue follows, because it is then argued that this creative industries policy should not represent a scaled-up version of extant arts, cultural or media policy, with its implicit welfaretheoretic foundations (see e.g. Peacock 2006), but is beginning to be seen as an underdeveloped element of services innovation in the context of the broader debate about successive generations of innovation policy (Rothwell 1994; Metcalfe & Miles 2000; Dodsgon et al. 2005; Cunningham et al. 2005). And while still a minority position, there is growing recognition that this implies a policy approach based on the 'Schumpeterian' or 'evolutionary economic' approach of innovation policy (Pelikan & Wegner 2003; Witt 2003; Cunningham 2009). What is seemingly occurring, then, is a reformation of industry policy as innovation policy (Morrison & Potts 2008) allied with a reconstruction of a new industrial grouping - creative industries - toward a modified conception of the innovation process.What, then, is the basis of this alleged connection between creative industries and innovation policy? There are many studies on innovation processes within the creative industries. For example, Castaner and Campos (2002), drawing on the theory of organizational innovation, examined the role of micro and organizational variables in the process of artistic innovation. Handke (2006, 2007) analyses innovation surveys to identify the factors contributing to innovation in the media industries, an approach also pursued by Tether (2003), who explicitly seeks comparison of innovation performance with other sectors. …" @default.
• W2079683422 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079683422 creator A5042648415 @default.
• W2079683422 date "2009-08-01" @default.
• W2079683422 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2079683422 title "Introduction" @default.
• W2079683422 cites W1491181508 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W1552481883 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W19607951 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W1978004920 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W1988846971 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W2006435360 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W2007066154 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W2023383881 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W2053018269 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W2063924752 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W2064580394 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W2076150175 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W2088500250 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W220803378 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W2267103190 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W3124353664 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W32108345 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W4235086218 @default.
• W2079683422 cites W97322399 @default.
• W2079683422 doi "https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.11.2.138" @default.
• W2079683422 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2079683422 type Work @default.
• W2079683422 sameAs 2079683422 @default.
• W2079683422 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222012 @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222013 @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222014 @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222015 @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222016 @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222017 @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222018 @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222019 @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222020 @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222021 @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222022 @default.
• W2079683422 countsByYear W20796834222023 @default.
• W2079683422 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079683422 hasAuthorship W2079683422A5042648415 @default.
• W2079683422 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2079683422 hasConceptScore W2079683422C138885662 @default.
• W2079683422 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2079683422 hasLocation W20796834221 @default.
• W2079683422 hasOpenAccess W2079683422 @default.
• W2079683422 hasPrimaryLocation W20796834221 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W105649369 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W1507273284 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W1589564810 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W1937944712 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W1964875616 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W1972629790 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2000498025 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2009441546 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2017699327 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2040965324 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2097725533 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2109299585 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2120529866 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2123283641 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2176082400 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2582899857 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2625385308 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W3124353664 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W749013635 @default.
• W2079683422 hasRelatedWork W2604311606 @default.
• W2079683422 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2079683422 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2079683422 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2079683422 magId "2079683422" @default.
• W2079683422 workType "article" @default.