FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079686404> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079686404 endingPage "206" @default.
• W2079686404 startingPage "177" @default.
• W2079686404 abstract "Lucifer in the City of LightThe Palladium Hoax and “Diabolical Causality” in Fin De Siècle France David Allen Harvey The fin de siècle was a time of intense political conflict and recurrent public scandal in France. After overcoming its monarchist foes at the ballot box and enjoying a brief period of stability in the early 1880s, the Third Republic lurched almost without interruption through a series of “Affairs”: Boulangism, Panama, and the Dreyfus controversy. The volatility of fin de siècle French politics reflected underlying social tensions, as rapid urbanization and industrialization, the rise of mass political movements of the left and right, and rapidly changing cultural mores undermined many of the certainties on which bourgeois life rested. Among French Catholics, these fears were compounded by the rise of militantly secular regimes in both France and Italy; the end of the temporal authority of the pope; the collapse of hopes for a monarchist restoration with the death of the Count of Chambord, the last Legitimist pretender, in 1883; and the experience of national decline, which was brought home painfully by humiliating defeat in the Franco-Prussian War.1 The conflicts that Herman Lebovics, writing about a slightly later period, [End Page 177] has described as “the wars over cultural identity” left many Frenchmen in both camps willing to believe the worst about their antagonists.2 A clever trickster, the journalist Léo Taxil, was able to take advantage of this situation by means of a spectacular hoax that lasted over a decade. Almost forgotten today, the “Palladium Affair” captivated and frightened thousands of French readers, mostly conservative Catholics, in the final years of the nineteenth century. The story of the Palladium, an alleged global satanic conspiracy led by Freemasonry against legitimate civil and religious order, was revealed in a series of publications between 1885 and 1897, most notably in Taxil’s magnum opus, Le diable au XIXème siècle, the principal subject of this article. Lurid, sensationalistic, and nearly two thousand pages long, Le diable au XIXème siècle combined political polemic with pulp fiction adventure and exoticism, a formula that quickly made it a success and ultimately a cause célèbre. Ultimately, however, the Palladium was revealed as a fraud in April 1897 by the man who had done the most to publicize it. Taxil’s hoax or “fumisterie,” which we will examine shortly, was successful, I will maintain, because his inventions dovetailed perfectly with the prejudices, fears, and modes of thought of his readers. The worldview presented in Le diable au XIXème siècle is starkly Manichean: good versus evil, darkness versus light, a world in which sinister forces guide human destinies through means imperceptible to the casual observer. Léon Poliakov has coined the term “diabolical causality” to describe a mentality in which “the evils of this world are attributable to a malevolent entity or organization, the Jews, for example.”3 In one of the few scholarly articles on the Palladium Affair, W. R. Jones has noted that Taxil’s conservative Catholic audience to a large degree already shared this mentality, writing that “the sterile thought-world of late nineteenth century French Catholicism, insecure and uncertain of itself in the face of the new science and the new politics, was prepared to believe the worst about the motives of its enemies and to suspect that the source of the church’s discomforts might be found in some gigantic Satanic plot.”4 For reasons that will become apparent below, I will argue that Poliakov’s concept of “diabolical causality” is particularly relevant to understanding the course and impact of the Palladium Affair. [End Page 178] Political anti-Semitism, Poliakov’s primary concern, was certainly one response of the beleaguered right to the challenges of modernity. Edouard Drumont’s La France juive charged that two hundred Jewish families were manipulating the French Republic and leading it to its ruin. Drumont continued to publicize these charges in his successful newspaper, La Libre Parole, and was a virulent critic of Captain Dreyfus and other prominent French Jews. Nor was Drumont an isolated figure; the integral nationalist Charles Maurras, another prominent anti-Dreyfusard, also condemned..." @default.
• W2079686404 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079686404 creator A5049066025 @default.
• W2079686404 date "2006-12-01" @default.
• W2079686404 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2079686404 title "Lucifer in the City of Light: The Palladium Hoax and “Diabolical Causality” in Fin De Siècle France" @default.
• W2079686404 cites W1175473903 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W1535173673 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W1601452337 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W1967887621 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W1968663087 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W1991559926 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W2065829575 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W2087998879 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W2109912869 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W2122280330 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W2164585321 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W2171036789 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W2315962830 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W2483510897 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W2797829371 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W591406594 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W608530562 @default.
• W2079686404 cites W635301712 @default.
• W2079686404 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/mrw.0.0078" @default.
• W2079686404 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2079686404 type Work @default.
• W2079686404 sameAs 2079686404 @default.
• W2079686404 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2079686404 countsByYear W20796864042016 @default.
• W2079686404 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079686404 hasAuthorship W2079686404A5049066025 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConcept C35361118 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConcept C6303427 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConceptScore W2079686404C142724271 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConceptScore W2079686404C17744445 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConceptScore W2079686404C199539241 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConceptScore W2079686404C204787440 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConceptScore W2079686404C35361118 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConceptScore W2079686404C6303427 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConceptScore W2079686404C71924100 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConceptScore W2079686404C94625758 @default.
• W2079686404 hasConceptScore W2079686404C95457728 @default.
• W2079686404 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2079686404 hasLocation W20796864041 @default.
• W2079686404 hasOpenAccess W2079686404 @default.
• W2079686404 hasPrimaryLocation W20796864041 @default.
• W2079686404 hasRelatedWork W2086998054 @default.
• W2079686404 hasRelatedWork W2102572942 @default.
• W2079686404 hasRelatedWork W2154080075 @default.
• W2079686404 hasRelatedWork W2312590211 @default.
• W2079686404 hasRelatedWork W2322233747 @default.
• W2079686404 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2079686404 hasRelatedWork W3081636841 @default.
• W2079686404 hasRelatedWork W4231938959 @default.
• W2079686404 hasRelatedWork W4239301697 @default.
• W2079686404 hasRelatedWork W3094616808 @default.
• W2079686404 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W2079686404 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2079686404 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2079686404 magId "2079686404" @default.
• W2079686404 workType "article" @default.