FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079717293> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079717293 endingPage "1235" @default.
• W2079717293 startingPage "1230" @default.
• W2079717293 abstract "Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis.BackgroundInsulin resistance is a central feature of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and may increase the risk of kidney stone formation. Existing cross-sectional data on the association between DM and nephrolithiasis are limited, and no prospective study to date has evaluated the relation between DM and the risk of kidney stones.MethodsTo evaluate the relation between DM and prevalent kidney stones, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 3 large cohorts including over 200,000 participants: the Nurses' Health Study I (older women), the Nurses' Health Study II (younger women), and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (men). We then prospectively studied the association between DM and incident nephrolithiasis over a combined 44 years of follow-up. Because insulin resistance can precede the diagnosis of DM by decades, we also prospectively examined the relation between kidney stones and the diagnosis of incident DM. Multivariate regression models adjusted for age, body mass index, thiazide diuretic use, fluid intake, and dietary factors.ResultsAt baseline, the multivariate relative risk of prevalent stone disease in individuals with DM compared to individuals without was 1.38 (95% CI 1.06-1.79) in older women, 1.67 (95% CI 1.28-2.20) in younger women, and 1.31 (95% CI 1.11-1.54) in men. Prospectively, the multivariate relative risk of incident kidney stone formation in participants with DM compared to participants without was 1.29 (95% CI 1.05-1.58) in older women, 1.60 (95% CI 1.16-2.21) in younger women, and 0.81 (95% CI 0.59-1.09) in men. The multivariate relative risk of incident DM in participants with a history of kidney stones compared to participants without was 1.33 (95% CI 1.18-1.50) in older women, 1.48 (95% CI 1.14-1.91) in younger women, and 1.49 (95% CI 1.29-1.72) in men.ConclusionDM is a risk factor for the development of kidney stones. Additional studies are needed to determine if the increased risk of DM in stone formers is due to subclinical insulin resistance. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis. Insulin resistance is a central feature of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and may increase the risk of kidney stone formation. Existing cross-sectional data on the association between DM and nephrolithiasis are limited, and no prospective study to date has evaluated the relation between DM and the risk of kidney stones. To evaluate the relation between DM and prevalent kidney stones, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 3 large cohorts including over 200,000 participants: the Nurses' Health Study I (older women), the Nurses' Health Study II (younger women), and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (men). We then prospectively studied the association between DM and incident nephrolithiasis over a combined 44 years of follow-up. Because insulin resistance can precede the diagnosis of DM by decades, we also prospectively examined the relation between kidney stones and the diagnosis of incident DM. Multivariate regression models adjusted for age, body mass index, thiazide diuretic use, fluid intake, and dietary factors. At baseline, the multivariate relative risk of prevalent stone disease in individuals with DM compared to individuals without was 1.38 (95% CI 1.06-1.79) in older women, 1.67 (95% CI 1.28-2.20) in younger women, and 1.31 (95% CI 1.11-1.54) in men. Prospectively, the multivariate relative risk of incident kidney stone formation in participants with DM compared to participants without was 1.29 (95% CI 1.05-1.58) in older women, 1.60 (95% CI 1.16-2.21) in younger women, and 0.81 (95% CI 0.59-1.09) in men. The multivariate relative risk of incident DM in participants with a history of kidney stones compared to participants without was 1.33 (95% CI 1.18-1.50) in older women, 1.48 (95% CI 1.14-1.91) in younger women, and 1.49 (95% CI 1.29-1.72) in men. DM is a risk factor for the development of kidney stones. Additional studies are needed to determine if the increased risk of DM in stone formers is due to subclinical insulin resistance." @default.
• W2079717293 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079717293 creator A5045693684 @default.
• W2079717293 creator A5051186379 @default.
• W2079717293 creator A5067413533 @default.
• W2079717293 date "2005-09-01" @default.
• W2079717293 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2079717293 title "Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis" @default.
• W2079717293 cites W1844518445 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W1958805324 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W1979118414 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W1980290895 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W1984352965 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2000881122 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2002842493 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2008108694 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2013185641 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2026138917 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2027532701 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2034114152 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2050885954 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2059922714 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2078881121 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2087327978 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2090631976 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2091764130 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2100175950 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2103825558 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2120021843 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2138146353 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2139106713 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2158944110 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2160605085 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2166521282 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2316269479 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2340504819 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2425075164 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W2462016362 @default.
• W2079717293 cites W4292996332 @default.
• W2079717293 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00516.x" @default.
• W2079717293 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16105055" @default.
• W2079717293 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2079717293 type Work @default.
• W2079717293 sameAs 2079717293 @default.
• W2079717293 citedByCount "432" @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932012 @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932013 @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932014 @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932015 @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932016 @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932017 @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932018 @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932019 @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932020 @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932021 @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932022 @default.
• W2079717293 countsByYear W20797172932023 @default.
• W2079717293 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079717293 hasAuthorship W2079717293A5045693684 @default.
• W2079717293 hasAuthorship W2079717293A5051186379 @default.
• W2079717293 hasAuthorship W2079717293A5067413533 @default.
• W2079717293 hasBestOaLocation W20797172931 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C148759681 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C2778653478 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C2779403450 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C2779728849 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C2779918671 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C2780437262 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C38180746 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C126322002 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C134018914 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C142052008 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C142724271 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C148759681 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C188816634 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C2778653478 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C2779403450 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C2779728849 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C2779918671 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C2780221984 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C2780437262 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C38180746 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C44249647 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C555293320 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C71924100 @default.
• W2079717293 hasConceptScore W2079717293C82789193 @default.
• W2079717293 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2079717293 hasLocation W20797172931 @default.

• next