FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079851211> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079851211 endingPage "32945" @default.
• W2079851211 startingPage "32941" @default.
• W2079851211 abstract "Recent gene ablation studies in mice have shown that matriptase, a type II transmembrane serine protease, and prostasin, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane serine protease, are both required for processing of the epidermis-specific polyprotein, profilaggrin, stratum corneum formation, and acquisition of epidermal barrier function. Here we present evidence that matriptase acts upstream of prostasin in a zymogen activation cascade that regulates terminal epidermal differentiation and is required for prostasin zymogen activation. Enzymatic gene trapping of matriptase combined with prostasin immunohistochemistry revealed that matriptase was co-localized with prostasin in transitional layer cells of the epidermis and that the developmental onset of expression of the two membrane proteases was coordinated and correlated with acquisition of epidermal barrier function. Purified soluble matriptase efficiently converted soluble prostasin zymogen to an active two-chain form that formed SDS-stable complexes with the serpin protease nexin-1. Whereas two forms of prostasin with molecular weights corresponding to the prostasin zymogen and active prostasin were present in wild type epidermis, prostasin was exclusively found in the zymogen form in matriptase-deficient epidermis. These data suggest that matriptase, an autoactivating protease, acts upstream from prostasin to initiate a zymogen cascade that is essential for epidermal differentiation. Recent gene ablation studies in mice have shown that matriptase, a type II transmembrane serine protease, and prostasin, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane serine protease, are both required for processing of the epidermis-specific polyprotein, profilaggrin, stratum corneum formation, and acquisition of epidermal barrier function. Here we present evidence that matriptase acts upstream of prostasin in a zymogen activation cascade that regulates terminal epidermal differentiation and is required for prostasin zymogen activation. Enzymatic gene trapping of matriptase combined with prostasin immunohistochemistry revealed that matriptase was co-localized with prostasin in transitional layer cells of the epidermis and that the developmental onset of expression of the two membrane proteases was coordinated and correlated with acquisition of epidermal barrier function. Purified soluble matriptase efficiently converted soluble prostasin zymogen to an active two-chain form that formed SDS-stable complexes with the serpin protease nexin-1. Whereas two forms of prostasin with molecular weights corresponding to the prostasin zymogen and active prostasin were present in wild type epidermis, prostasin was exclusively found in the zymogen form in matriptase-deficient epidermis. These data suggest that matriptase, an autoactivating protease, acts upstream from prostasin to initiate a zymogen cascade that is essential for epidermal differentiation. The serine proteases constitute one of the largest classes of proteolytic enzymes and have evolved to perform specialized functions. Trypsin-like serine proteases typically are synthesized as inactive zymogens that are activated by a single endoproteolytic cleavage. This group of enzymes often acts in either single or complex, highly regulated zymogen cascades to control important biological processes such as coagulation, fibrinolysis, blood pressure, and digestion (1Davie E.W. Fujikawa K. Kiesel W. Biochemistry. 1991; 30: 10363-10370Crossref PubMed Scopus (1636) Google Scholar, 2Danø K. Andreasen P.A. Grøndahl-Hansen J. Kristensen P. Nielsen L.S. Skriver L. Adv. Cancer Res. 1985; 44: 139-266Crossref PubMed Scopus (2304) Google Scholar, 3Kitamoto Y. Yuan X. Wu Q. McCourt D.W. Sadler J.E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91: 7588-7592Crossref PubMed Scopus (149) Google Scholar, 4Rawlings N.D. Morton F.R. Barrett A.J. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34: D270-D272Crossref PubMed Scopus (468) Google Scholar). The stratum corneum is the outermost, terminally differentiated layer of the epidermis that provides a physical barrier protecting the body from fluid loss, as well as from mechanical, chemical, and microbial insults. The stratum corneum is a two-compartment structure consisting of a lipid-enriched extracellular matrix in which an interlocking meshwork of flattened dead keratinocytes (corneocytes) are embedded (5Nemes Z. Steinert P.M. Exp. Mol. Med. 1999; 31: 5-19Crossref PubMed Scopus (454) Google Scholar, 6Roop D. Science. 1995; 267: 474-475Crossref PubMed Scopus (174) Google Scholar, 7Presland R.B. Dale B.A. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2000; 11: 383-408Crossref PubMed Scopus (313) Google Scholar). Our previous studies have shown that the targeted deletion of the type II transmembrane trypsin-like serine protease, matriptase, leads to loss of inwards and outwards epidermal barrier function due to incomplete corneocyte differentiation and abnormal intercorneocyte lipid extrusion correlating at the molecular level with defective proteolytic processing of profilaggrin (8List K. Haudenschild C.C. Szabo R. Chen W. Wahl S.M. Swaim W. Engelholm L.H. Behrendt N. Bugge T.H. Oncogene. 2002; 21: 3765-3779Crossref PubMed Scopus (286) Google Scholar, 9List K. Szabo R. Wertz P.W. Segre J. Haudenschild C.C. Kim S.Y. Bugge T.H. J. Cell Biol. 2003; 163: 901-910Crossref PubMed Scopus (179) Google Scholar, 10List K. Bugge T.H. Szabo R. Mol. Med. 2006; 12: 1-7Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 11List K. Szabo R. Molinolo A. Nielsen B.S. Bugge T.H. Am. J. Pathol. 2006; 168: 1513-1525Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar). Interestingly, mice with the targeted deletion of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) 3The abbreviations used are: GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; PN-1, protease nexin-1; X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside; PI-PLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C. -anchored trypsin-like serine protease, prostasin (PRSS8), in keratinized tissues recently were reported to display the identical spectrum of deficiencies in stratum corneum formation (12Leyvraz C. Charles R.P. Rubera I. Guitard M. Rotman S. Breiden B. Sandhoff K. Hummler E. J. Cell Biol. 2005; 170: 487-496Crossref PubMed Scopus (235) Google Scholar) to those described for matriptase-deficient mice (summarized in Table 1). Moreover, both protease-deficient transgenic mouse strains displayed identical hair follicle defects and thymic abnormalities (Table 1).TABLE 1Phenotypic comparison of matriptase and prostasin-deficient miceParameterMatriptase-/-Prostasin-/-SurvivalPostnatal lethalityPostnatal lethalityBody weight and body lengthReducedReducedExternal appearance of skinReddish and wrinkledReddish and wrinkledHair folliclesImmatureImmatureThymusHypoplasticHypoplasticInwards epidermal barrier functionImpairedImpairedOutwards epidermal barrier functionImpairedImpairedCorneocytesEnlargedEnlargedEpidermal lipid compositionAbnormalAbnormalFilaggrinAbsentAbsentProfilaggrin processingImpairedImpairedEpidermal differentiation markers besides profilaggrin/filaggrinNormalNormal Open table in a new tab The identical phenotypes of matriptase- and prostasin-deficient mice suggested that the two membrane serine proteases either could be components of two distinct zymogen cascades that each are critical to terminal epidermal differentiation or, alternatively, could be components of the same proteolytic cascade. Here we present histological, biochemical, and genetic evidence that matriptase and prostasin define a single zymogen activation cascade in the epidermis, that matriptase acts upstream of prostasin, and that matriptase is an essential epidermal activator of the prostasin zymogen. Mice—Experiments followed institutional guidelines. Matriptase knock-out and β-galactosidase-tagged matriptase knock-in mice were described (8List K. Haudenschild C.C. Szabo R. Chen W. Wahl S.M. Swaim W. Engelholm L.H. Behrendt N. Bugge T.H. Oncogene. 2002; 21: 3765-3779Crossref PubMed Scopus (286) Google Scholar, 11List K. Szabo R. Molinolo A. Nielsen B.S. Bugge T.H. Am. J. Pathol. 2006; 168: 1513-1525Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar). Histological Stains—X-gal and immunohistochemical stains were performed as described (11List K. Szabo R. Molinolo A. Nielsen B.S. Bugge T.H. Am. J. Pathol. 2006; 168: 1513-1525Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar). The mouse prostasin antibody has been described (13Chen L. Wang C. Chen M. Marcello M.R. Chao J. Chao L. Chai K.X. Am. J. Physiol. 2006; 291: F567-F577Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar). Generation of Soluble Recombinant Prostasin—HEK-293T cells were transfected with pCMV-SPORT6 expression vector containing full-length mouse prostasin (I.M.A.G.E clone 3600399) or full-length human prostasin cDNA (I.M.A.G.E clone 3138532) in pIRES2-EGFP (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA) using Polyfect reagent (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). Cells were lysed 24–48 h after transfection using 50 mm Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mm NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% Nonidet P-40 with protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma). For phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) treatment, washed cells were mechanically lifted from the plates by gentle pipetting, incubated with 1 unit/ml PI-PLC (Sigma) in phosphate-buffered saline for 4 h at 4 °C, and centrifuged for 10 min at 1000 × g, and the supernatant containing the PI-PLC-released proteins was collected. Protein concentrations were determined with a BCA protein assay Kit (Pierce). The concentration of PI-PLC-released prostasin was estimated by Western blot by serial dilution against a known concentration of activated prostasin obtained commercially. Prostasin Zymogen Activation by Matriptase—Human soluble prostasin (∼0.1 μm) was incubated with 1 or 10 nm recombinant active human matriptase serine protease domain (14Friedrich R. Fuentes-Prior P. Ong E. Coombs G. Hunter M. Oehler R. Pierson D. Gonzalez R. Huber R. Bode W. Madison E.L. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 2160-2168Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar) for 1 h at 37°C in 50 mm Tris, pH 8.5, 100 nm NaCl. For complex formation, protease nexin-1 (PN-1), 700 mm PN-1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was added for 1 h at 37°C. Proteins were analyzed by 4–12% reducing SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using a monoclonal anti-prostasin antibody (Pharmingen) and SuperSignal West Dura extended duration kit (Pierce). Biochemical Analysis of Mouse Epidermis—Epidermis was isolated from newborn mice as described (9List K. Szabo R. Wertz P.W. Segre J. Haudenschild C.C. Kim S.Y. Bugge T.H. J. Cell Biol. 2003; 163: 901-910Crossref PubMed Scopus (179) Google Scholar), ground into a fine powder in liquid nitrogen, homogenized in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mm Tris at pH 7.4, 2 mm EDTA, 150 mm NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS) with protease inhibitor mixture set III (Calbiochem), cleared by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C, and protein concentration determined by the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad). Proteins were resolved by 13% reducing SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot using the monoclonal anti-prostasin antibody described above. Densitometric scanning of Western blots was performed using NIH Image software. Real-time PCR—RNA was isolated from skin as described (8List K. Haudenschild C.C. Szabo R. Chen W. Wahl S.M. Swaim W. Engelholm L.H. Behrendt N. Bugge T.H. Oncogene. 2002; 21: 3765-3779Crossref PubMed Scopus (286) Google Scholar). The prostasin primers 5′-GGAGGCAAGGATGCCTGCCA-3′ and 5′-GAGAGTGGGCCCCCAGAGTCAC-3′ were used for quantitative real-time PCR. Prostasin expression levels were normalized against GAPDH mRNA levels in each sample, amplified with the primers 5′-GTGAAGCAGGCATCTGAGG-3′ and 5′-CATCGAAGGTGGAAGAGTGG-3′. Co-localization and Coordinated Expression of Matriptase and Prostasin during Terminal Epidermal Differentiation—To analyze expression of matriptase and prostasin in mouse epidermis, we used a knock-in mouse (11List K. Szabo R. Molinolo A. Nielsen B.S. Bugge T.H. Am. J. Pathol. 2006; 168: 1513-1525Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar) that carries one wild type matriptase allele and one allele where the exons encoding the serine protease domain of matriptase have been replaced by a β-galactosidase marker gene (matriptase+/E16β-gal mice). This mouse strain synthesizes a matriptase-β-galactosidase fusion protein under transcriptional control of the endogenous matriptase gene and can be used as a sensitive marker for matriptase expression using X-gal staining. The co-localization of matriptase with prostasin was analyzed by immunohistochemistry of serial sections or, when staining intensity permitted, by immunohistochemical staining of X-gal-stained sections with prostasin antibodies to simultaneously visualize the two proteases. As described recently (11List K. Szabo R. Molinolo A. Nielsen B.S. Bugge T.H. Am. J. Pathol. 2006; 168: 1513-1525Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar), X-gal staining of the skin of matriptase+/E16β-gal mice showed that matriptase expression was confined to the uppermost living layer of the interfollicular epidermis of 7-day-old mouse pups (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, immunohistochemical staining of interfollicular epidermis revealed a similar localization of prostasin (Fig. 1B). Combined X-gal staining for matriptase and immunohistochemical staining for prostasin revealed overlapping expression in interfollicular epidermis at this age (Fig. 1C) as well as in newborn pups (Fig. 1E), demonstrating that the two membrane-associated proteases have the potential to physically interact in vivo. To determine the time of onset of expression of matriptase and prostasin in the developing epidermis, combined X-gal staining and immunohistochemistry of matriptase+/E16β-gal embryos at embryonic day (E) 14.5 to E16.5 was performed. At E14.5 and E15.5 no expression of either of the two serine proteases could be detected (Fig. 1, F and G). At E16.5, however, both matriptase and prostasin were expressed (Fig. 1H), temporally correlating with stratum corneum formation and the onset of acquisition of the epidermal barrier (15Hardman M.J. Sisi P. Banbury D.N. Byrne C. Development (Camb.). 1998; 125: 1541-1552PubMed Google Scholar). X-gal staining combined with immunohistochemical staining for the marker of basal keratinocytes, cytokeratin-14, demonstrated the clear suprabasal expression of the two proteases at this developmental stage (Fig. 1I). Matriptase Activates the Prostasin Zymogen in a Cell-free System—Previous studies have shown that the matriptase zymogen undergoes autoactivation during synthesis (16Oberst M.D. Chen L.Y. Kiyomiya K. Williams C.A. Lee M.S. Johnson M.D. Dickson R.B. Lin C.Y. Am. J. Physiol. 2005; 289: C462-C470Crossref PubMed Scopus (124) Google Scholar, 17Oberst M.D. Williams C.A. Dickson R.B. Johnson M.D. Lin C.Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 26773-26779Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar). In contrast, the prostasin zymogen is unable to undergo autoactivation and a physiological activator of prostasin has not been identified (18Shipway A. Danahay H. Williams J.A. Tully D.C. Backes B.J. Harris J.L. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004; 324: 953-963Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar). Activation of the prostasin zymogen occurs by endoproteolytic cleavage after Arg12 within the amino acid sequence QPR12-ITG, a cleavage reaction that could be mediated by matriptase, based on studies of matriptase specificity (19Takeuchi T. Harris J.L. Huang W. Yan K.W. Coughlin S.R. Craik C.S. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 26333-26342Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (392) Google Scholar). These observations suggested that matriptase would act upstream of prostasin if the two proteases were part of the same zymogen cascade. To test this, we expressed prostasin in HEK-293T cells. The recombinant prostasin was released from the cell surface with PI-PLC to generate a soluble form of prostasin that presented as a dominant 40-kDa species and two minor species with slightly higher and lower electrophoretic mobility when analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting under reducing conditions (Fig. 2, lane 1). Prostasin generated this way appeared to be predominantly in the zymogen form, as it did not form complexes with the cognate serpin PN-1, which forms SDS-stable complexes with active prostasin (13Chen L. Wang C. Chen M. Marcello M.R. Chao J. Chao L. Chai K.X. Am. J. Physiol. 2006; 291: F567-F577Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar) but not with the prostasin zymogen (Fig. 2, compare lane 2 with lanes 4 and 6). This suggested that the faint higher and lower molecular weight species both could represent glycosylation variants of the zymogen (13Chen L. Wang C. Chen M. Marcello M.R. Chao J. Chao L. Chai K.X. Am. J. Physiol. 2006; 291: F567-F577Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar). Activation of the prostasin zymogen leads to the formation of active two-chain prostasin, which can be distinguished from the prostasin zymogen by a small increase in electrophoretic mobility in high-percentage SDS-PAGE gels after reduction of the single disulfide bridge that links the two chains (13Chen L. Wang C. Chen M. Marcello M.R. Chao J. Chao L. Chai K.X. Am. J. Physiol. 2006; 291: F567-F577Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar). Exposure of soluble prostasin zymogen to either 1 or 10 nm active matriptase protease domain led to the formation of a prominent immunoreactive band with the mobility expected for active prostasin (Fig. 2, compare lane 1 with lanes 3 and 5). The percentage of prostasin zymogen converted to this higher mobility species by matriptase varied between prostasin preparations and was never complete, even with very high matriptase concentrations (data not shown). This suggested that not all recombinant prostasin released from HEK-293T cells by PI-PLC was in a conformational state that permitted the activation by matriptase. To confirm that the cleavage of the prostasin zymogen by matriptase leads to the formation of active prostasin, we incubated untreated and matriptase-treated prostasin with PN-1 and detected prostasin-PN-1 complexes by Western blotting using anti-prostasin antibodies. In the absence of preincubation with matriptase, no prostasin-PN-1 complex was observed (Fig. 2, lane 2). However, when prostasin zymogen was first exposed to matriptase and then incubated with PN-1, a prominent 85-kDa molecular mass complex that was immunoreactive with anti-prostasin antibodies was observed (Fig. 2, compare lane 2 with lanes 4 and 6). Taken together, these data show that the matriptase catalytic domain is capable of converting the zymogen of prostasin to active, serpin-reactive prostasin in a cell-free system. Lack of Proteolytically Processed Prostasin Zymogen and Prostasin Zymogen Accumulation in Matriptase-ablated Epidermis—The striking phenotypic similarities between matriptase- and prostasin-deficient mice (Table 1), when combined with our data presented above, strongly suggested that matriptase could be a physiological activator of the prostasin zymogen during terminal epidermal differentiation and predicted the existence of a matriptase-prostasin zymogen cascade in epidermal differentiation. To definitively test this, we determined the state of activation of epidermal prostasin in the presence and absence of matriptase. Protein lysates were prepared from the epidermis of newborn wild type mice and their matriptase-deficient littermates (8List K. Haudenschild C.C. Szabo R. Chen W. Wahl S.M. Swaim W. Engelholm L.H. Behrendt N. Bugge T.H. Oncogene. 2002; 21: 3765-3779Crossref PubMed Scopus (286) Google Scholar), and prostasin processing was analyzed by the separation of the protein lysates by reducing SDS/PAGE on high percentage gradient gels, followed by Western blotting using prostasin antibodies (Fig. 3A). In wild type epidermis, prostasin was found in two forms: a 39-kDa form, compatible with the apparent molecular mass of the prostasin zymogen, and a 37-kDa form, compatible with activated prostasin (Fig. 3, lanes 3–5). In contrast, in matriptase-ablated epidermis, prostasin was exclusively found in the higher molecular mass 39-kDa zymogen form. Furthermore, the 39-kDa form of prostasin was frequently more abundant in matriptase-deficient epidermis (Fig. 3, lanes 6–8, and data not shown). This increase in prostasin zymogen did not appear to be caused by a corresponding increase in the steady state level of prostasin mRNA as judged by real-time PCR analysis (data not shown), suggesting that the accumulation was caused by loss of zymogen activation by matriptase. To quantitatively assess the formation of active prostasin in matriptase-sufficient and -deficient epidermis, protein extracts from the epidermis of five matriptase-sufficient and five matriptase-deficient littermates were analyzed by Western blot. The fraction of total prostasin presenting as active prostasin was determined by densitometric scanning of the blot (Fig. 3B). In matriptase-sufficient epidermis, 40–51% of prostasin was in the active two-chain form, while the amount of active prostasin in matriptase-deficient epidermis was below the level of detection. Taken together, these data provide definitive evidence that matriptase is essential for the proteolytic processing of prostasin in the epidermis. The coordinated expression and co-localization of matriptase and prostasin in the epidermis and the activation of prostasin zymogen by matriptase in vitro and in vivo, when combined with the identical phenotype of matriptase and prostasin-deficient mice, provides compelling evidence for the existence of a matriptase-prostasin zymogen activation cascade regulating terminal epidermal differentiation. This suggests that loss of profilaggrin processing, defective corneocyte maturation, and abnormal intercorneocyte lipid extrusion in matriptase-deficient epidermis may all be secondary to loss of prostasin zymogen activation. Increasing evidence indicates that terminal epidermal differentiation is regulated by a sophisticated cascade of serine proteases and serine protease inhibitors that all become expressed in transitional layer cells during stratum corneum formation and undergo sequential activation during stratum corneum maturation and shedding (8List K. Haudenschild C.C. Szabo R. Chen W. Wahl S.M. Swaim W. Engelholm L.H. Behrendt N. Bugge T.H. Oncogene. 2002; 21: 3765-3779Crossref PubMed Scopus (286) Google Scholar, 11List K. Szabo R. Molinolo A. Nielsen B.S. Bugge T.H. Am. J. Pathol. 2006; 168: 1513-1525Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar, 20Descargues P. Deraison C. Bonnart C. Kreft M. Kishibe M. Ishida-Yamamoto A. Elias P. Barrandon Y. Zambruno G. Sonnenberg A. Hovnanian A. Nat. Genet. 2005; 37: 56-65Crossref PubMed Scopus (310) Google Scholar, 21Yang T. Liang D. Koch P.J. Hohl D. Kheradmand F. Overbeek P.A. Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 2354-2358Crossref PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar, 22Hewett D.R. Simons A.L. Mangan N.E. Jolin H.E. Green S.M. Fallon P.G. McKenzie A.N. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005; 14: 335-346Crossref PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar, 23Chavanas S. Bodemer C. Rochat A. Hamel-Teillac D. Ali M. Irvine A.D. Bonafe J.L. Wilkinson J. Taieb A. Barrandon Y. Harper J.I. de Prost Y. Hovnanian A. Nat. Genet. 2000; 25: 141-142Crossref PubMed Scopus (707) Google Scholar, 24Zeeuwen P.L. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2004; 83: 761-773Crossref PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar, 25Brattsand M. Stefansson K. Lundh C. Haasum Y. Egelrud T. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2005; 124: 198-203Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (273) Google Scholar, 26Hansson L. Backman A. Ny A. Edlund M. Ekholm E. Ekstrand Hammarstrom B. Tornell J. Wallbrandt P. Wennbo H. Egelrud T. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2002; 118: 444-449Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (153) Google Scholar, 27Resing K.A. Johnson R.S. Walsh K.A. Biochemistry. 1993; 32: 10036-10045Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar, 28Resing K.A. Thulin C. Whiting K. al-Alawi N. Mostad S. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 28193-28198Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (49) Google Scholar, 29Pearton D.J. Nirunsuksiri W. Rehemtulla A. Lewis S.P. Presland R.B. Dale B.A. Exp. Dermatol. 2001; 10: 193-203Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar). The serine proteases currently proposed to be critical for stratum corneum formation include matriptase, prostasin, stratum corneum tryptic enzyme, stratum corneum chymotryptic enzyme, furin, and profilaggrin processing endopeptidase1. Additionally, serine protease inhibitors, including the Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor, hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor-1, and the Kazal-type, multidomain serine protease inhibitor, SPINK5, could have key roles in regulating the activity of one or several of these proteases in both human and mouse epidermis. Pertubations causing increased or decreased serine protease activity in the upper epidermis have serious pathophysiological consequences. Thus, ablation of matriptase or prostasin prevents acquisition of the epidermal barrier by blocking terminal epidermal differentiation (9List K. Szabo R. Wertz P.W. Segre J. Haudenschild C.C. Kim S.Y. Bugge T.H. J. Cell Biol. 2003; 163: 901-910Crossref PubMed Scopus (179) Google Scholar, 12Leyvraz C. Charles R.P. Rubera I. Guitard M. Rotman S. Breiden B. Sandhoff K. Hummler E. J. Cell Biol. 2005; 170: 487-496Crossref PubMed Scopus (235) Google Scholar), while, conversely, SPINK5 deficiency or overexpression of stratum corneum chymotryptic enzyme compromises the epidermal barrier through premature epidermal differentiation and accelerated shedding of the stratum corneum (21Yang T. Liang D. Koch P.J. Hohl D. Kheradmand F. Overbeek P.A. Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 2354-2358Crossref PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar, 22Hewett D.R. Simons A.L. Mangan N.E. Jolin H.E. Green S.M. Fallon P.G. McKenzie A.N. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005; 14: 335-346Crossref PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar, 23Chavanas S. Bodemer C. Rochat A. Hamel-Teillac D. Ali M. Irvine A.D. Bonafe J.L. Wilkinson J. Taieb A. Barrandon Y. Harper J.I. de Prost Y. Hovnanian A. Nat. Genet. 2000; 25: 141-142Crossref PubMed Scopus (707) Google Scholar, 26Hansson L. Backman A. Ny A. Edlund M. Ekholm E. Ekstrand Hammarstrom B. Tornell J. Wallbrandt P. Wennbo H. Egelrud T. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2002; 118: 444-449Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (153) Google Scholar). It remains to be determined whether a single proteolytic cascade or multiple independent proteolytic cascades are operational during terminal epidermal differentiation. Previously, stratum corneum tryptic enzyme has been proposed to act upstream of stratum corneum chymotryptic enzyme during the desquamation of stratum corneum (25Brattsand M. Stefansson K. Lundh C. Haasum Y. Egelrud T. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2005; 124: 198-203Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (273) Google Scholar), and our results now show that matriptase acts upstream of prostasin during terminal epidermal differentiation. In addition to loss of epidermal barrier formation, matriptase deficiency also severely impairs stratum corneum desquamation (9List K. Szabo R. Wertz P.W. Segre J. Haudenschild C.C. Kim S.Y. Bugge T.H. J. Cell Biol. 2003; 163: 901-910Crossref PubMed Scopus (179) Google Scholar). These observations suggest the intriguing hypothesis that the four serine proteases and SPINK5 could be part of a single zymogen cascade with a complexity reminiscent of other serine protease zymogen cascades, such as those involved in blood coagulation or digestion. Matriptase and prostasin both have a fairly wide expression in epithelial tissues and both are frequently dysregulated in epithelial tumors (10List K. Bugge T.H. Szabo R. Mol. Med. 2006; 12: 1-7Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 30Oberst M. Anders J. Xie B. Singh B. Ossandon M. Johnson M. Dickson R.B. Lin C.Y. Am. J. Pathol. 2001; 158: 1301-1311Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (172) Google Scholar, 31Benaud C. Dickson R.B. Lin C.Y. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001; 268: 1439-1447Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar, 32Benaud C. Oberst M. Hobson J.P. Spiegel S. Dickson R.B. Lin C.Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 10539-10546Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar, 33Oberst M.D. Johnson M.D. Dickson R.B. Lin C.Y. Singh B. Stewart M. Williams A. al-Nafussi A. Smyth J.F. Gabra H. Sellar G.C. Clin. Cancer Res. 2002; 8: 1101-1107PubMed Google Scholar, 34Kang J.Y. Dolled-Filhart M. Ocal I.T. Singh B. Lin C.Y. Dickson R.B. Rimm D.L. Camp R.L. Cancer Res. 2003; 63: 1101-1105PubMed Google Scholar, 35Oberst M.D. Singh B. Ozdemirli M. Dickson R.B. Johnson M.D. Lin C.Y. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2003; 51: 1017-1025Crossref PubMed Scopus (143) Google Scholar, 36Hoang C.D. D'Cunha J. Kratzke M.G. Casmey C.E. Frizelle S.P. Maddaus M.A. Kratzke R.A. Chest. 2004; 125: 1843-1852Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar, 37Santin A.D. Zhan F. Bellone S. Palmieri M. Cane S. Bignotti E. Anfossi S. Gokden M. Dunn D. Roman J.J. O'Brien T.J. Tian E. Cannon M.J. Shaughnessy Jr., J. Pecorelli S. Int. J. Cancer. 2004; 112: 14-25Crossref PubMed Scopus (254) Google Scholar, 38Tanimoto H. Shigemasa K. Tian X. Gu L. Beard J.B. Sawasaki T. O'Brien T.J. Br. J. Cancer. 2005; 92: 278-283Crossref PubMed Scopus (51) Google Scholar, 39Yu J.X. Chao L. Chao J. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 13483-13489Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar, 40Chen L.M. Hodge G.B. Guarda L.A. Welch J.L. Greenberg N.M. Chai K.X. Prostate. 2001; 48: 93-103Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar, 41Mok S.C. Chao J. Skates S. Wong K. Yiu G.K. Muto M.G. Berkowitz R.S. Cramer D.W. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 1458-1464Crossref PubMed Scopus (260) Google Scholar, 42Chen L.M. Chai K.X. Int. J. Cancer. 2002; 97: 323-329Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar, 43Fukushima K. Naito H. Funayama Y. Yonezawa H. Haneda S. Shibata C. Sasaki I. J. Gastroenterol. 2004; 39: 940-947Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar). The role of matriptase as a prostasin zymogen activator and the potential function of the matriptaseprostasin cascade in other physiological processes and in pathophysiological processes, such as cancer, are clearly important areas for future study." @default.
• W2079851211 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079851211 creator A5005232540 @default.
• W2079851211 creator A5006083279 @default.
• W2079851211 creator A5027779533 @default.
• W2079851211 creator A5029289418 @default.
• W2079851211 creator A5029835673 @default.
• W2079851211 creator A5053783489 @default.
• W2079851211 creator A5056731799 @default.
• W2079851211 creator A5060624698 @default.
• W2079851211 creator A5088594132 @default.
• W2079851211 date "2006-11-01" @default.
• W2079851211 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2079851211 title "Evidence for a Matriptase-Prostasin Proteolytic Cascade Regulating Terminal Epidermal Differentiation" @default.
• W2079851211 cites W1517476370 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W1532331610 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W1575310826 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W1970357063 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W1972549014 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W1977911881 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W1985407614 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W1991757994 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W1994139100 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W1999561220 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2007918447 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2012637659 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2018202678 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2019436999 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2020745334 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2025280623 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2031969028 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2050774919 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2057457864 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2061103446 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2067296905 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2069466394 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2072024103 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2085020399 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2092473594 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2097754683 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2098964013 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2105558581 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2106050309 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2115848227 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2119542456 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2123344301 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2123850865 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2146185664 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2148611562 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2154154560 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W2154484742 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W23122061 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W4231166943 @default.
• W2079851211 cites W93701885 @default.
• W2079851211 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.c600208200" @default.
• W2079851211 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16980306" @default.
• W2079851211 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2079851211 type Work @default.
• W2079851211 sameAs 2079851211 @default.
• W2079851211 citedByCount "172" @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112012 @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112013 @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112014 @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112015 @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112016 @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112017 @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112018 @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112019 @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112020 @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112021 @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112022 @default.
• W2079851211 countsByYear W20798512112023 @default.
• W2079851211 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079851211 hasAuthorship W2079851211A5005232540 @default.
• W2079851211 hasAuthorship W2079851211A5006083279 @default.
• W2079851211 hasAuthorship W2079851211A5027779533 @default.
• W2079851211 hasAuthorship W2079851211A5029289418 @default.
• W2079851211 hasAuthorship W2079851211A5029835673 @default.
• W2079851211 hasAuthorship W2079851211A5053783489 @default.
• W2079851211 hasAuthorship W2079851211A5056731799 @default.
• W2079851211 hasAuthorship W2079851211A5060624698 @default.
• W2079851211 hasAuthorship W2079851211A5088594132 @default.
• W2079851211 hasBestOaLocation W20798512111 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConcept C181199279 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConcept C2779664074 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConcept C3019223276 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConceptScore W2079851211C181199279 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConceptScore W2079851211C185592680 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConceptScore W2079851211C2779664074 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConceptScore W2079851211C3019223276 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConceptScore W2079851211C41008148 @default.
• W2079851211 hasConceptScore W2079851211C55493867 @default.

• next