FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2079862821> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2079862821 endingPage "256" @default.
• W2079862821 startingPage "229" @default.
• W2079862821 abstract "Those who conduct integrated assessments (IAs) are aware of the need to explicitly consider multiple criteria and uncertainties when evaluating policies for preventing global warming. MCDM methods are potentially useful for understanding tradeoffs and evaluating risks associated with climate policy alternatives. A difficulty facing potential MCDM users is the wide range of different techniques that have been proposed, each with distinct advantages. Methods differ in terms of validity, ease of use, and appropriateness to the problem. Alternative methods also can yield strikingly different rankings of alternatives. A workshop was held in which climate change experts and policy makers evaluated the usefulness of MCDM for IA. Participants applied several methods in the context of a hypothetical greenhouse gas policy decision. Methods compared include value and utility functions, goal programming, ELECTRE, fuzzy sets, stochastic dominance, min max regret, and several weight selection methods. Ranges, rather than point estimates, were provided for some questions to incorporate imprecision regarding weights. Additionally, several visualization methods for both deterministic and uncertain cases were used and evaluated. Analysis of method results and participant feedback through questionnaires and discussion provide the basis for conclusions regarding the use of MCDM methods for climate change policy and IA analyses. Hypotheses are examined concerning predictive and convergent validity of methods, existence of splitting bias among experts, perceived ability of methods to aid decision-making, and whether expressing imprecision can change ranking results. Because participants gained from viewing a problem from several perspectives and results from different methods often significantly differed, it appears worthwhile to apply several MCDM methods to increase user confidence and insight. The participants themselves recommended such multimethod approaches for policymaking. Yet they preferred the freedom of unaided decision-making most of all, challenging the MCDM community to create transparent methods that permit maximum user control. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd." @default.
• W2079862821 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2079862821 creator A5010365641 @default.
• W2079862821 creator A5048161179 @default.
• W2079862821 creator A5075393733 @default.
• W2079862821 creator A5077873688 @default.
• W2079862821 creator A5089464561 @default.
• W2079862821 date "2001-09-01" @default.
• W2079862821 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2079862821 title "An evaluation of multi-criteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy" @default.
• W2079862821 cites W117971002 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W1485725787 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W1522522053 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W1542562726 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W1965267170 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W1966399860 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W1968916215 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W1977896946 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W1980054641 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W1983315430 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W1987256615 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W1998936316 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2000112289 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2005522335 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2009259098 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2017340222 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2029848956 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2040689732 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2046134970 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2054613605 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2058827804 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2059102543 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2059433282 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2062300030 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2063129146 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2067265079 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2079717418 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2087286091 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2089582739 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2091333932 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2099593619 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2124395325 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2130380534 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2165477019 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2167307376 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2169588654 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W2484658597 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W4249630396 @default.
• W2079862821 cites W4292158025 @default.
• W2079862821 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.305" @default.
• W2079862821 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2079862821 type Work @default.
• W2079862821 sameAs 2079862821 @default.
• W2079862821 citedByCount "85" @default.
• W2079862821 countsByYear W20798628212012 @default.
• W2079862821 countsByYear W20798628212013 @default.
• W2079862821 countsByYear W20798628212014 @default.
• W2079862821 countsByYear W20798628212015 @default.
• W2079862821 countsByYear W20798628212016 @default.
• W2079862821 countsByYear W20798628212017 @default.
• W2079862821 countsByYear W20798628212018 @default.
• W2079862821 countsByYear W20798628212019 @default.
• W2079862821 countsByYear W20798628212020 @default.
• W2079862821 countsByYear W20798628212022 @default.
• W2079862821 countsByYear W20798628212023 @default.
• W2079862821 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2079862821 hasAuthorship W2079862821A5010365641 @default.
• W2079862821 hasAuthorship W2079862821A5048161179 @default.
• W2079862821 hasAuthorship W2079862821A5075393733 @default.
• W2079862821 hasAuthorship W2079862821A5077873688 @default.
• W2079862821 hasAuthorship W2079862821A5089464561 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C11105738 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C33252445 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C47431972 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C50817715 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConceptScore W2079862821C11105738 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConceptScore W2079862821C112930515 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConceptScore W2079862821C119857082 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConceptScore W2079862821C144133560 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConceptScore W2079862821C149782125 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConceptScore W2079862821C151730666 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConceptScore W2079862821C154945302 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConceptScore W2079862821C162324750 @default.
• W2079862821 hasConceptScore W2079862821C189430467 @default.

• next