FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2080200089> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2080200089 endingPage "25.e2" @default.
• W2080200089 startingPage "18" @default.
• W2080200089 abstract "Electrocardiographic (ECG) Q- and ST-T–wave abnormalities predict coronary heart disease (CHD) and total mortality. No comparison has been made of the classification of these abnormalities by the 2 most widely used ECG coding systems for epidemiologic studies—the Minnesota Code (MC) and Novacode (NC). We evaluated 12-lead electrocardiograms from 64,597 participants (49 to 79 years old, 82% non-Hispanic white) in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial in 1993 to 1998, with a maximum of 11 years of follow-up. We used MC and NC criteria to identify Q-wave, ST-segment, and T-wave abnormalities for comparison. In total, 3,322 participants (5.1%) died during an average 8-year follow-up, and 1,314 had incident CHD in the baseline cardiovascular disease-free group. Independently, ECG myocardial infarction criteria by the MC or NC were generally equivalent and were strong predictors for CHD death and total mortality (hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.51 for CHD death; hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.71 for total mortality) in a multivariable analytic model. Electrocardiograms with major ST-T abnormalities by the MC or NC coding system were stronger in predicting CHD deaths and total mortality than was the presence of Q waves alone. In conclusion, the ECG classification systems for myocardial infarction/ischemia abnormalities from the MC and NC are valuable and useful in clinical trials and epidemiologic studies. ST-T abnormalities are stronger predictors for CHD events and total mortality than isolated Q-wave abnormalities. Electrocardiographic (ECG) Q- and ST-T–wave abnormalities predict coronary heart disease (CHD) and total mortality. No comparison has been made of the classification of these abnormalities by the 2 most widely used ECG coding systems for epidemiologic studies—the Minnesota Code (MC) and Novacode (NC). We evaluated 12-lead electrocardiograms from 64,597 participants (49 to 79 years old, 82% non-Hispanic white) in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial in 1993 to 1998, with a maximum of 11 years of follow-up. We used MC and NC criteria to identify Q-wave, ST-segment, and T-wave abnormalities for comparison. In total, 3,322 participants (5.1%) died during an average 8-year follow-up, and 1,314 had incident CHD in the baseline cardiovascular disease-free group. Independently, ECG myocardial infarction criteria by the MC or NC were generally equivalent and were strong predictors for CHD death and total mortality (hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.51 for CHD death; hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.71 for total mortality) in a multivariable analytic model. Electrocardiograms with major ST-T abnormalities by the MC or NC coding system were stronger in predicting CHD deaths and total mortality than was the presence of Q waves alone. In conclusion, the ECG classification systems for myocardial infarction/ischemia abnormalities from the MC and NC are valuable and useful in clinical trials and epidemiologic studies. ST-T abnormalities are stronger predictors for CHD events and total mortality than isolated Q-wave abnormalities." @default.
• W2080200089 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2080200089 creator A5047366011 @default.
• W2080200089 creator A5078842144 @default.
• W2080200089 creator A5087659816 @default.
• W2080200089 date "2010-07-01" @default.
• W2080200089 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2080200089 title "Evaluation and Comparison of the Minnesota Code and Novacode for Electrocardiographic Q-ST Wave Abnormalities for the Independent Prediction of Incident Coronary Heart Disease and Total Mortality (from the Women's Health Initiative)" @default.
• W2080200089 cites W1967668941 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W1997058408 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2027544387 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2031203816 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2040385598 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2045187405 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2050032102 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2060727621 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2070492296 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2072893576 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2095881142 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2097569438 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2120914209 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2121236256 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2135448950 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2138126868 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2145439797 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2149437716 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2152841023 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2167395179 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2290627980 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W2291483902 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W4213156194 @default.
• W2080200089 cites W4231947181 @default.
• W2080200089 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.02.007" @default.
• W2080200089 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20609641" @default.
• W2080200089 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2080200089 type Work @default.
• W2080200089 sameAs 2080200089 @default.
• W2080200089 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2080200089 countsByYear W20802000892012 @default.
• W2080200089 countsByYear W20802000892013 @default.
• W2080200089 countsByYear W20802000892015 @default.
• W2080200089 countsByYear W20802000892016 @default.
• W2080200089 countsByYear W20802000892017 @default.
• W2080200089 countsByYear W20802000892018 @default.
• W2080200089 countsByYear W20802000892019 @default.
• W2080200089 countsByYear W20802000892021 @default.
• W2080200089 countsByYear W20802000892023 @default.
• W2080200089 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2080200089 hasAuthorship W2080200089A5047366011 @default.
• W2080200089 hasAuthorship W2080200089A5078842144 @default.
• W2080200089 hasAuthorship W2080200089A5087659816 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConcept C207103383 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConcept C2780040984 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConcept C50382708 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConceptScore W2080200089C126322002 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConceptScore W2080200089C164705383 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConceptScore W2080200089C207103383 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConceptScore W2080200089C2780040984 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConceptScore W2080200089C44249647 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConceptScore W2080200089C500558357 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConceptScore W2080200089C50382708 @default.
• W2080200089 hasConceptScore W2080200089C71924100 @default.
• W2080200089 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2080200089 hasLocation W20802000891 @default.
• W2080200089 hasLocation W20802000892 @default.
• W2080200089 hasOpenAccess W2080200089 @default.
• W2080200089 hasPrimaryLocation W20802000891 @default.
• W2080200089 hasRelatedWork W1727188710 @default.
• W2080200089 hasRelatedWork W1972702180 @default.
• W2080200089 hasRelatedWork W2089715561 @default.
• W2080200089 hasRelatedWork W2093502227 @default.
• W2080200089 hasRelatedWork W2117378160 @default.
• W2080200089 hasRelatedWork W2119154902 @default.
• W2080200089 hasRelatedWork W2133235702 @default.
• W2080200089 hasRelatedWork W2203903734 @default.
• W2080200089 hasRelatedWork W2917746345 @default.
• W2080200089 hasRelatedWork W2461326802 @default.
• W2080200089 hasVolume "106" @default.
• W2080200089 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2080200089 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2080200089 magId "2080200089" @default.
• W2080200089 workType "article" @default.