Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2080330892> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2080330892 endingPage "254" @default.
- W2080330892 startingPage "219" @default.
- W2080330892 abstract "A long tradition in American political history associates the presidency of Andrew Jackson with the achievement of universal suffrage and the coming of democracy, at least for adult white males. There is some justification for this view, but only in limited senses; for the most part this interpretation has had a deleterious effect on our understanding of political development in the early republic. In particular it has created the belief that relatively few people possessed the right to vote in the early republic, and that therefore mass participation was postponed to the years after 1815. As recently as September 2008 the distinguished historian Jill Lepore could write in the New Yorker that during Washington's presidency only 6 percent of Americans could vote - which admittedly translates into about 15 percent of the free adult population. Sean Wilentz's prize-winning Rise of American Democracy (2005) recognizes that the suffrage was much more widely spread before 1815, but he still builds his interpretation around the assumption that politics did not involve the public at large until the Age of Jackson. Even Alexander Keyssar's illuminating The Right to Vote (2000) and Daniel Walker Howe's excellent What Hath God Wrought (2007) assume that the practice of politics became more democratic in the 1820s because of recent fundamental changes in electoral rules. Such views are explicitly contradicted by the voting data that Philip Lampi has gathered that are now available on the A New Nation Votes website, which confirm the huge expansion of popular participation within two decades or so of the adoption of the United States Constitution.1This expansion was possible because the right to vote had always been extraordinarily widespread - at least among adult white males - even before the country gained its independence. During the colonial period, the right to vote for the lower house of colonial legislatures had been defined in traditional British terms: Only people who had freehold landed property sufficient to ensure that they were personally independent and had a vested interest in the welfare of their communities could vote. That qualification normally applied to men who were heads of households, since women were almost by definition dependent, but the right could extend to widows who had become responsible for the family property. Some colonies excluded propertied people whose civic commitment they suspected - recent arrivals, members of minority religious sects, and racial groups deemed unacceptable. But those most generally excluded were laborers, tenant farmers, unskilled workers, and indentured servants, all of whom were considered to lack a stake in society, a permanent interest in the community, and the wherewithal to withstand corruption.2In Britain property qualifications increasingly restricted the number qualified to vote. Whereas over 20 percent of adult males had enjoyed the franchise around 1700, population growth and the increasing concentration of wealth reduced the proportion to 17.2 percent by 1754, continuing down to 12.7 percent in England and Wales by the 1820s.3By contrast, the abundance and availability of land in North America meant that large numbers of colonists satisfied similarly denned requirements. This was especially true where the requirement was expressed in terms of acreage rather than value, as was customarily the case in the southern colonies: It was much easier to acquire (and to measure) 50 acres than land worth £50 either at sale or in annual rents. Six colonies also allowed alternative qualifications to freehold ownership in the form of personal property or payment of taxes, opening the suffrage to owners of urban property, and even to those prosperous farmers who rented their land or held it on some form of leasehold.4Consequently, as early as the 1 720s the suffrage was uniquely wide in the colonies. Virginia reputedly had the most restrictive franchise, with fewer than half the free white males qualified to vote, but a recent calculation raises the figure to two-thirds at midcentury, declining slightly thereafter. …" @default.
- W2080330892 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2080330892 creator A5076038027 @default.
- W2080330892 date "2013-01-01" @default.
- W2080330892 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2080330892 title "The Right to Vote and the Rise of Democracy, 1787-1828" @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1487886555 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1491580659 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1517691037 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1521918597 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1545199277 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1597658998 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1603693185 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1754688093 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1964529874 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1964721279 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1969946260 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1971112420 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1974562888 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1975692414 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1978632955 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1980377313 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1988386051 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1990580359 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1993060111 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1993399924 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1995249350 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1997296897 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1997319225 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W1997989357 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2001051065 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2012938301 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2013148578 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2021785411 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2021877899 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2026538816 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2035200238 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2037091021 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2040615081 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2047282223 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2047780393 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2051279857 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2052884129 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W205396346 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2055350684 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2061919558 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2064767807 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2069208141 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2074421394 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2076528231 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2077280902 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2077772236 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2086468760 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2095951900 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2102912565 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2143180160 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2146636254 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2152958632 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2153060067 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2159318854 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2164967004 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2165910691 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2169525420 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2312284883 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2313501100 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2314281859 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2320288067 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2325819772 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2328256342 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2329296766 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2330096225 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2332746081 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2335225175 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2600266056 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2786394615 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2796397166 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2796655985 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2796662032 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2797047434 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2797253382 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2797602093 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W2798364065 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W3180406630 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W565835767 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W577653716 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W577772302 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W604417297 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W614814255 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W625993547 @default.
- W2080330892 cites W633072596 @default.
- W2080330892 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jer.2013.0033" @default.
- W2080330892 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2080330892 type Work @default.
- W2080330892 sameAs 2080330892 @default.
- W2080330892 citedByCount "25" @default.
- W2080330892 countsByYear W20803308922014 @default.
- W2080330892 countsByYear W20803308922015 @default.
- W2080330892 countsByYear W20803308922017 @default.