FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2080351430> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2080351430 endingPage "34" @default.
• W2080351430 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2080351430 abstract "Factory Labor and Literary Aesthetics: The “Lowell Mill Girl,” Popular Fiction, and the Proletarian Grotesque Lori Merish (bio) Herman Melville’s 1855 Story “The Tartarus of Maids” both enacts and ironizes the phenomenon this essay aims to explicate: the pervasive sexualization of antebellum working-class women in cultural representation. The story recounts the January visit of the male narrator, a “seedsman” who seeks supplies for his growing business, to a paper mill in the remote, treacherous, “shaggy-wooded” mountains of New England (324). The paper mill’s Dantean setting helps introduce the story as industrial allegory and sets the stage for the encounter that follows (324–25). Melville’s narrator “take[s] in” the “scene” in one “sweeping glance,” and—as in many accounts of male visitors to the Lowell mills—the scene is infused with eroticism; that the narrator’s guide is called “Cupid” suggests Love’s reign in the factory, while the first machine the narrator sees produces “rose-hued note paper” impressed with a “wreath of roses”—seemingly the stuff of “love-letters” (327–29), perhaps the pink and white Valentines (often decorated with Cupid’s image) mass produced by the 1840s (Shank). However, contrary to the “romance of labor” penned by factory celebrants, the narrator’s re-presentation of factory work is characterized not by the idealized portrayal of “factory Queens” but by images of female servility and dehumanization. In “Tartarus,” the factory appropriates the women’s sexuality, draining the pale, “blank-looking” women of erotic and reproductive vitality; for Melville, the figured contrast between the [End Page 1] “rosy paper” and the “pallid cheek[s]” captures the tragic reversals that mill work entails (328–29). Indeed, the paper factory is explicitly designated a realm of perverse coupling: phallic, “piston-like” machines (called “iron animal[s]”) are tended by “passive-looking” women, “pale virgin[s]” who serve as the machines’ “tame minister[s]” (328, 334). This motif culminates in a startling image of industrial reproduction: the paper making machine is located in a “room, stifling with a strange, blood-like, abdominal heat,” where the “egg-like substance” of pulp is “developed” into “germinous particles” of “paper” (331). If the mill is a realm of sexual coupling and reproductivity, it is seemingly devoid of female desire: Cupid, “gliding about among the passive-looking girls—like a gold fish through hueless waves,” is not the emissary of a voluptuous, impetuous goddess but an errand-boy among “unresisting” female servants (329). Remarking that “the human voice was banished from the spot,” the narrator drives home the story’s industrial critique: “Machinery—that vaunted slave of humanity—here stood menially served by human beings, who served mutely and cringingly as the slave serves the Sultan. The girls did not so much seem accessory wheels to the general machinery as mere cogs to the wheels” (328). The constellation of figurative imagery—the paper mill is a “great whited sepulchre,” mill work is a “fatal sentence,” the girls are their own “executioners” and their complexions signify “consumptive pallors”—is meant to underscore the devastating effect of mill work on the female laborer (324, 330). At the same time, by figuring the millwomen’s “slavery” (albeit in Orientalist terms) while giving their whiteness an emphatic, hyperbolic presence, Melville at once evokes and contains the ways in which millwomen’s bodily presence could trouble the nativist icon of the “mill girl” (routinely opposed, in early defenses of American industrialism, to her degraded counterpart in Manchester) and the discourses of “respectable” white working-class womanhood that gave that icon symbolic legibility. In the “Valentine Offering,” a “beautiful little sheet” (qtd. in Foner, Factory Girls 143) issued by the Lowell Female Labor Reform Association for a special gathering on St. Valentine’s Day, 1846, Lowell women writers addressed the central irony of Melville’s story.1 While the remote, rural setting of Melville’s story intensifies both the women’s isolation and the misery of their industrial “slave[ry],” Lowell women’s texts link urban factory work to a novel, vibrant female peer culture, [End Page 2] and they give rise to new forms of social subjectivity. Unlike the millwomen in “Tartarus” who produce the raw..." @default.
• W2080351430 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2080351430 creator A5034866945 @default.
• W2080351430 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2080351430 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2080351430 title "Factory Labor and Literary Aesthetics: The “Lowell Mill Girl,” Popular Fiction, and the Proletarian Grotesque" @default.
• W2080351430 cites W1483859914 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W1508124898 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W1528504241 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W1533200881 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W1535695181 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W1552873664 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W1969144301 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W1973583588 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2005007794 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2010723246 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2012355733 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2013573542 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2013859876 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2014471547 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2016833646 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2018578077 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2020011792 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2030153105 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2037249250 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2048938600 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2051799795 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2058767381 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2059176337 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2069197837 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2076484926 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2078104274 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2080096208 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2087416884 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2094443085 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2252398477 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2313144832 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2317933004 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2323063472 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2329752314 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2333987223 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2334948077 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2335450880 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2337363162 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2341614909 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W243429613 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2566729068 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W2945475727 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W567175300 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W606199153 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W636147279 @default.
• W2080351430 cites W652661604 @default.
• W2080351430 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2012.0022" @default.
• W2080351430 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2080351430 type Work @default.
• W2080351430 sameAs 2080351430 @default.
• W2080351430 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2080351430 countsByYear W20803514302017 @default.
• W2080351430 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2080351430 hasAuthorship W2080351430A5034866945 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C15553842 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C16057445 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C2777128807 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C2778047097 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C40149104 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C518914266 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C53813258 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C107993555 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C124952713 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C138496976 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C142362112 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C144024400 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C15553842 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C15744967 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C16057445 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C166957645 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C17744445 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C199360897 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C199539241 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C2777128807 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C2778047097 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C40149104 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C41008148 @default.
• W2080351430 hasConceptScore W2080351430C518914266 @default.

• next