FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2080521928> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2080521928 endingPage "107" @default.
• W2080521928 startingPage "105" @default.
• W2080521928 abstract "ThepaperbyILFabelinski|fl ‘‘Thepredictionanddiscoveryof Rayleigh line fine structure’’ 1 is of great interest for the history of physics and especially for the history of such an important question as the discovery of Mandelstam‐Brillouin scattering (more familiar to the Western reader as Brillouin scattering). I had an opportunity to read the paper before it was published and I would like to report in this note some additional facts related to the history of this discovery and also to express my opinion about some of the questions discussed. In 2000, it will be 70 years since Evgeni|fl Fedorovich Gross discovered Mandelstam‐Brillouin scattering in quartz crystals and liquids. It was very difficult to detect this phenomenon before the advent of lasers. Prior to E F Gross, such noted researchers as J Cabannes and P Salvier (France), M Vaushe (France), S Rafalovsky (Poland), and C Raman (India) had failed to do it. Once E F Gross published his results, they were repeated for liquids in the Debye Laboratory at Leipzig University only three years later, and for crystals only in 1938 (C Raman). An important feature of I L Fabelinski|fl’s paper are the excerpts from letters of E F Gross to G S Landsberg, which were found recently and were written in the period when they were studying the problem of the fine structure of the Rayleigh line 2 . The publication of these letters demonstrates the atmosphere in which the studies aimed at the discovery of the fine structure of the Rayleigh line were developed and it is also importantbecauseduringthelastyearsofEFGross’slifeand especially after his death, statements appeared in the native literature that distorted the real situation (a comment from the editorial board of Physics‐Uspekhi on the paper by Kastler about Brillouin [2], a note by Bobovich in the Physical Encyclopedic Dictionary [3], etc.) and even blamed Gross for his apparently unethical behavior when he published his results on the observation of the fine structure of the Rayleigh line in quartz. As one can see from the correspondence (between Mandelstam‐Landsberg and Gross), the work proceeded in close contact and everything was done by mutual consent. Initially, they planned to publish simultaneously, but in different notes, the results obtained by G S Landsberg (the broadening of the Rayleigh line) and E F Gross (the fine structure of the Rayleigh line). Then, as follows from the correspondence, E F Gross suggested to L I Mandelstam and G S Landsberg publishing a joint paper based on his experimental results. However, L I Mandelstam and G S Landsberg refused the joint publication because they did not trust the experimental evidence obtained by E F Gross. Finally, E F Gross decided to publish independently his results on the fine structure of the Rayleigh line. He writes to G S Landsberg: ‘‘This was promoted, of course, by your repeated amiable advice not to delay the publication of my note.’’ It was found later that the doubts of Mandelstam and Landsberg were vain, whereas the discovery of the fine structure of the Rayleigh line made by E F Gross proved to be correct and generally acknowledged. I L Fabelinski|fl considers the possible reasons for which" @default.
• W2080521928 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2080521928 creator A5013441451 @default.
• W2080521928 date "2000-01-31" @default.
• W2080521928 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2080521928 title "On the experimental discovery of Mandelstam–Brillouin scattering" @default.
• W2080521928 cites W1964172082 @default.
• W2080521928 cites W2036475469 @default.
• W2080521928 cites W2071726168 @default.
• W2080521928 cites W2329542926 @default.
• W2080521928 doi "https://doi.org/10.1070/pu2000v043n01abeh000676" @default.
• W2080521928 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2080521928 type Work @default.
• W2080521928 sameAs 2080521928 @default.
• W2080521928 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2080521928 countsByYear W20805219282022 @default.
• W2080521928 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2080521928 hasAuthorship W2080521928A5013441451 @default.
• W2080521928 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2080521928 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2080521928 hasConcept C191486275 @default.
• W2080521928 hasConcept C194232370 @default.
• W2080521928 hasConcept C43989790 @default.
• W2080521928 hasConceptScore W2080521928C120665830 @default.
• W2080521928 hasConceptScore W2080521928C121332964 @default.
• W2080521928 hasConceptScore W2080521928C191486275 @default.
• W2080521928 hasConceptScore W2080521928C194232370 @default.
• W2080521928 hasConceptScore W2080521928C43989790 @default.
• W2080521928 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2080521928 hasLocation W20805219281 @default.
• W2080521928 hasOpenAccess W2080521928 @default.
• W2080521928 hasPrimaryLocation W20805219281 @default.
• W2080521928 hasRelatedWork W2036164408 @default.
• W2080521928 hasRelatedWork W2038375443 @default.
• W2080521928 hasRelatedWork W2049005054 @default.
• W2080521928 hasRelatedWork W2054328850 @default.
• W2080521928 hasRelatedWork W2054906890 @default.
• W2080521928 hasRelatedWork W2083119155 @default.
• W2080521928 hasRelatedWork W2084260172 @default.
• W2080521928 hasRelatedWork W2149571546 @default.
• W2080521928 hasRelatedWork W2162850508 @default.
• W2080521928 hasRelatedWork W2773466867 @default.
• W2080521928 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W2080521928 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2080521928 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2080521928 magId "2080521928" @default.
• W2080521928 workType "article" @default.