FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2080652010> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2080652010 endingPage "117" @default.
• W2080652010 startingPage "109" @default.
• W2080652010 abstract "The aim of this study was to compare the effects of conventional weight-training (control) with an experimental programme. The training programme consisted of 12 sessions, 3 a week for 4 weeks. The experimental group (n = 12) performed sets of forearm flexion with a barbell until a 20% decline in maximal force was noted. The controls (n = 11) trained according to established weight-training principles. Isometric tests were performed on both the right and left forearm flexors and during forearm flexion with a barbell: the tests were continued for a 3-week post-experimental period. The subjects were matched on all tests at the start of the experiment. Larger reductions in muscle torque within the training sessions were noted among the experimental subjects--19.8 +/- 2.0, 16.9 +/- 1.9 and 18.0 +/- 1.8% for right, left and combined elbow flexion respectively, compared to 11.8 +/- 2.7, 14.9 +/- 4.1 and 13.4 +/- 3.1% for the controls. The volume of training (number of lifts) was 30.4% higher for the experimental subjects. Muscle strength increased in both groups (P less than 0.05). The controls improved by 12.7 +/- 6.9, 24.9 +/- 22.1, 18.3 +/- 12.3 and 30.3 +/- 11.1% for right, left, combined isometric strength and the barbell test respectively. These did not differ significantly from the corresponding results for the experimental group--7.6 +/- 8.8, 17.0 +/- 12.4, 11.8 +/- 9.3 and 29.1 +/- 10.6% (P greater than 0.05). Neither the decrease in force during a single training session nor the volume of training were related to the training effect expressed as an increase in muscle force (P greater than 0.05). The effectiveness of the conventional programme in producing similar improvements in muscle strength to the experimental programme suggests that a high volume of training is unnecessary for strength gains." @default.
• W2080652010 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2080652010 creator A5032686958 @default.
• W2080652010 creator A5045541220 @default.
• W2080652010 creator A5051351423 @default.
• W2080652010 creator A5067550551 @default.
• W2080652010 creator A5067848127 @default.
• W2080652010 date "1992-04-01" @default.
• W2080652010 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2080652010 title "Investigation of an experimental weight‐training programme" @default.
• W2080652010 cites W1963825782 @default.
• W2080652010 cites W1974534866 @default.
• W2080652010 cites W2023006768 @default.
• W2080652010 cites W2026685984 @default.
• W2080652010 cites W2046695148 @default.
• W2080652010 cites W2067586471 @default.
• W2080652010 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419208729913" @default.
• W2080652010 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1588681" @default.
• W2080652010 hasPublicationYear "1992" @default.
• W2080652010 type Work @default.
• W2080652010 sameAs 2080652010 @default.
• W2080652010 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2080652010 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2080652010 hasAuthorship W2080652010A5032686958 @default.
• W2080652010 hasAuthorship W2080652010A5045541220 @default.
• W2080652010 hasAuthorship W2080652010A5051351423 @default.
• W2080652010 hasAuthorship W2080652010A5067550551 @default.
• W2080652010 hasAuthorship W2080652010A5067848127 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConcept C103486182 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConcept C123550912 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConcept C2780214079 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConcept C3019131375 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConceptScore W2080652010C103486182 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConceptScore W2080652010C123550912 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConceptScore W2080652010C141071460 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConceptScore W2080652010C1862650 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConceptScore W2080652010C2780214079 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConceptScore W2080652010C2781184374 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConceptScore W2080652010C3019131375 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConceptScore W2080652010C33923547 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConceptScore W2080652010C71924100 @default.
• W2080652010 hasConceptScore W2080652010C99508421 @default.
• W2080652010 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2080652010 hasLocation W20806520101 @default.
• W2080652010 hasLocation W20806520102 @default.
• W2080652010 hasOpenAccess W2080652010 @default.
• W2080652010 hasPrimaryLocation W20806520101 @default.
• W2080652010 hasRelatedWork W1965538991 @default.
• W2080652010 hasRelatedWork W1981249021 @default.
• W2080652010 hasRelatedWork W1992260724 @default.
• W2080652010 hasRelatedWork W2010787919 @default.
• W2080652010 hasRelatedWork W2071204526 @default.
• W2080652010 hasRelatedWork W2156294721 @default.
• W2080652010 hasRelatedWork W2347998847 @default.
• W2080652010 hasRelatedWork W2374220117 @default.
• W2080652010 hasRelatedWork W2753894455 @default.
• W2080652010 hasRelatedWork W2946740104 @default.
• W2080652010 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2080652010 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2080652010 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2080652010 magId "2080652010" @default.
• W2080652010 workType "article" @default.