Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2080706677> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2080706677 endingPage "558" @default.
- W2080706677 startingPage "551" @default.
- W2080706677 abstract "There has been a resurgence of controversy about the usefulness of observational data to study the efficacy of drugs. Nearly every week a researcher makes some criticism of clinical trials or justifies observational research into intended effects, with other researchers offering a contradictory viewpoint. Literature reviews are not useful in this regard because the contradictory studies will not usually be carried out. Some methods are discussed which may have potential utility in the study of intended effects. There may be a marginal role for statistical techniques such as propensity scores and confounder scores. More promising techniques may include ecological analyses, restriction of subjects and blinded prospective review. Because it is currently unknown when the observational study of drug efficacy is possible, we should arguably always carry out a study of the determinants of prescribing first, and possibly consider using the various techniques that are outlined in this article." @default.
- W2080706677 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2080706677 creator A5017591016 @default.
- W2080706677 date "2003-01-01" @default.
- W2080706677 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2080706677 title "Approaches to combat with confounding by indication in observational studies of intended drug effects" @default.
- W2080706677 cites W147516639 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W1506774621 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W1835355504 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W1891815666 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W1966723818 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W1974689215 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W1982489161 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W1988552920 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W1994856048 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W1995944041 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2003559644 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2006338848 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2006875971 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2014799253 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2015795623 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2022211849 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2024612449 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2045398130 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2049628830 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2053857612 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2061137783 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2062248680 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2065277296 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2067764770 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2072022253 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2079519145 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2084917404 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2098364806 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2100630414 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2106228247 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2107176478 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2121690051 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2122120608 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2127140689 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2128625737 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2134915662 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2135224674 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2136670164 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2150291618 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2151355802 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2151688269 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2159917198 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2162365574 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2165112395 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2167277064 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2268005646 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2288260588 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2307853871 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2319983832 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2416253225 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W2616141209 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W3108630675 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W4232980238 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W4239728164 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W4249274483 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W4252677501 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W4296499091 @default.
- W2080706677 cites W6812186 @default.
- W2080706677 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.883" @default.
- W2080706677 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14558178" @default.
- W2080706677 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
- W2080706677 type Work @default.
- W2080706677 sameAs 2080706677 @default.
- W2080706677 citedByCount "103" @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772012 @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772013 @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772014 @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772015 @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772016 @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772017 @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772018 @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772019 @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772020 @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772021 @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772022 @default.
- W2080706677 countsByYear W20807066772023 @default.
- W2080706677 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2080706677 hasAuthorship W2080706677A5017591016 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConcept C17923572 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConceptScore W2080706677C124952713 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConceptScore W2080706677C126322002 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConceptScore W2080706677C142362112 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConceptScore W2080706677C177713679 @default.
- W2080706677 hasConceptScore W2080706677C17923572 @default.