FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2080762241> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2080762241 endingPage "1499" @default.
• W2080762241 startingPage "1492" @default.
• W2080762241 abstract "Background Cement remnants were frequently associated with peri-implantitis. Recently, a shoulderless abutment was proposed, raising some concern about cement excess removal. Aim To compare different cementation techniques for implant-supported restorations assessing the amount of cement remnants in the peri-implant sulcus. Additional aim was to compare the effect of these cementation techniques using two different abutment designs. Material & methods Forty-six patients requiring double implant-supported restoration in the posterior maxilla were randomly divided in two groups according to the cementation modality: intraoral and extraoral. According to the abutment finishing line, implants in each patient were randomly assigned to shoulderless or chamfer subgroup. In the intraoral group, crowns were directly seated onto the titanium abutment. In the extraoral group, crowns were firstly seated onto a resin abutment replica and immediately removed, then cleansed of the cement excess and finally seated on the titanium abutment. After cement setting, in both groups, cement excess was carefully tried to remove. Three months later, framework/abutment complexes were disconnected and prepared for microscopic analysis: surface occupied by exposed cement remnants and marginal gaps were measured. Additionally, crown/abutment complexes were grinded, and voids of cement were measured at abutment/crown interface. Related-samples Friedman's two-way analysis of variance by ranks was used to detect differences between groups and subgroups (P ≤ 0.5). Results At the end of the study, a mean value of 0.45 mm2 (±0.80), 0.38 mm2 (±0.84), and 0.065 mm2 (±0.13) and 0.07 mm2 (±0.15) described surface occupied by cement remnants in shoulderless and chamfer abutment with intraoral cementation and shoulderless and chamfer abutment with extraoral cementation, respectively. A mean value of 0.40 mm2 (±0.377), 0.41 mm2 (±0.39) and 0.485 mm2 (±0.47) and 0.477 mm2 (±0.43) described cement voids at the abutment/crown interface; a mean value of 0.062 mm (±0.03), 0.064 mm (±0.35), 0.055 mm (±0.016) and 0.054 mm (±0.024) described marginal gaps. Statistics showed tendency of intraoral cementation to have significantly higher cement remnants compared with abutments with extraoral cementation groups. At the same time, the presence of voids was significantly higher in case of extraoral cementation. No significant differences between groups for the variable “gap”. Conclusions Despite the presence of more voids, extraoral cementation reduces cement excess. However, using low adhesivity cement and careful cement removal, a very limited quantity of cement remnants was observed also in the intraoral cementation." @default.
• W2080762241 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2080762241 creator A5059959248 @default.
• W2080762241 creator A5065919310 @default.
• W2080762241 creator A5083433848 @default.
• W2080762241 creator A5084567808 @default.
• W2080762241 creator A5085385234 @default.
• W2080762241 creator A5090958160 @default.
• W2080762241 date "2015-04-06" @default.
• W2080762241 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2080762241 title "Clinical evaluation of an improved cementation technique for implant-supported restorations: a randomized controlled trial" @default.
• W2080762241 cites W1576235171 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W1597502107 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W1855530663 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W1957402320 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W1976898789 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W1988201278 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W1995023542 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W2000293819 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W2011783904 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W2016704343 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W2028147968 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W2030274344 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W2037132782 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W2039559114 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W2054168210 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W2069375246 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W2082407790 @default.
• W2080762241 cites W2099589445 @default.
• W2080762241 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12589" @default.
• W2080762241 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25846254" @default.
• W2080762241 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2080762241 type Work @default.
• W2080762241 sameAs 2080762241 @default.
• W2080762241 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2080762241 countsByYear W20807622412016 @default.
• W2080762241 countsByYear W20807622412017 @default.
• W2080762241 countsByYear W20807622412018 @default.
• W2080762241 countsByYear W20807622412019 @default.
• W2080762241 countsByYear W20807622412020 @default.
• W2080762241 countsByYear W20807622412021 @default.
• W2080762241 countsByYear W20807622412022 @default.
• W2080762241 countsByYear W20807622412023 @default.
• W2080762241 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2080762241 hasAuthorship W2080762241A5059959248 @default.
• W2080762241 hasAuthorship W2080762241A5065919310 @default.
• W2080762241 hasAuthorship W2080762241A5083433848 @default.
• W2080762241 hasAuthorship W2080762241A5084567808 @default.
• W2080762241 hasAuthorship W2080762241A5085385234 @default.
• W2080762241 hasAuthorship W2080762241A5090958160 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C2778400979 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C2780641865 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C2908906697 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C48777230 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C523993062 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConcept C94556721 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C127413603 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C141071460 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C147176958 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C159985019 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C192562407 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C199343813 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C202271784 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C2778400979 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C2780641865 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C2781411149 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C2908906697 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C29694066 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C48777230 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C523993062 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C71924100 @default.
• W2080762241 hasConceptScore W2080762241C94556721 @default.
• W2080762241 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2080762241 hasLocation W20807622411 @default.
• W2080762241 hasLocation W20807622412 @default.
• W2080762241 hasOpenAccess W2080762241 @default.
• W2080762241 hasPrimaryLocation W20807622411 @default.
• W2080762241 hasRelatedWork W1706577863 @default.
• W2080762241 hasRelatedWork W1995411617 @default.
• W2080762241 hasRelatedWork W2012978146 @default.
• W2080762241 hasRelatedWork W2035220155 @default.
• W2080762241 hasRelatedWork W2223335214 @default.
• W2080762241 hasRelatedWork W2397891947 @default.
• W2080762241 hasRelatedWork W2417712630 @default.
• W2080762241 hasRelatedWork W2468105086 @default.
• W2080762241 hasRelatedWork W2976050451 @default.
• W2080762241 hasRelatedWork W2989102324 @default.
• W2080762241 hasVolume "27" @default.

• next