FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2080783107> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2080783107 endingPage "2388" @default.
• W2080783107 startingPage "2388" @default.
• W2080783107 abstract "Current literature supports the use of the three-view plain-radiograph series supplemented, when necessary, with helical computed tomography to evaluate the cervical spine in patients who have sustained trauma injury. The purpose of this study was to determine if helical computed tomography alone can be used to evaluate the cervical spine for acute osseous injury following high-energy trauma, thus eliminating the need to make radiographs.Patients were prospectively evaluated with helical computed tomography scanning of the cervical spine and standard three-view plain radiography. At a later date, the plain radiographs and computed tomography scans were independently reviewed by two radiologists who were blinded to both the initial interpretation and the interpretation of the corresponding study. The radiologists documented whether the plain radiographs were adequate and whether they showed an acute process. The findings in the study were compared with the initial findings and, when necessary, with the discharge summaries to determine if an injury had been identified. The accuracy of the plain radiographs, of the plain radiographs that had been deemed adequate, and of helical computed tomography used alone was ascertained.Plain radiographs and helical computed tomography scans were made for 407 patients, and traumatic injuries were identified in fifty-eight of them. Plain radiographs alone were adequate for 194 (48%) of the 407 patients. Plain radiographs had a sensitivity of 45%, a specificity of 97%, a positive predictive value of 74%, and a negative predictive value of 91%. Adequate plain radiographs had a sensitivity of 52%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 81%, and a negative predictive value of 93%. Helical computed tomography had a sensitivity and specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 89%, and a negative predictive value of >99%. The sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of adequate plain radiographs differed significantly from those of helical computed tomography alone (p < 0.001). Twelve (48%) of twenty-five adequate plain radiographs of patients in whom an injury had been identified on computed tomography missed that injury. Helical computed tomography alone missed one (2%) of the fifty-eight injuries.Although helical computed tomography has a limited ability to detect pure ligamentous injury, it can be safely used without plain radiographs to evaluate the cervical spine for osseous abnormalities such as fractures and dislocations after high-energy trauma." @default.
• W2080783107 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2080783107 creator A5005761175 @default.
• W2080783107 creator A5007052796 @default.
• W2080783107 creator A5025842153 @default.
• W2080783107 creator A5029576395 @default.
• W2080783107 creator A5042078064 @default.
• W2080783107 creator A5074754329 @default.
• W2080783107 creator A5084525714 @default.
• W2080783107 date "2005-11-01" @default.
• W2080783107 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2080783107 title "Helical Computed Tomography Alone Compared with Plain Radiographs with Adjunct Computed Tomography to Evaluate the Cervical Spine After High-Energy Trauma" @default.
• W2080783107 cites W1968348326 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W1971252000 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W1990722853 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2004951759 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2008072879 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2016275822 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2017113728 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2020996937 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2040978007 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2056208640 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2062294270 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2073709329 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2079909778 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2094237728 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2095241099 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2164160470 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2318402775 @default.
• W2080783107 cites W2801744811 @default.
• W2080783107 doi "https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.e.00208" @default.
• W2080783107 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16264112" @default.
• W2080783107 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2080783107 type Work @default.
• W2080783107 sameAs 2080783107 @default.
• W2080783107 citedByCount "68" @default.
• W2080783107 countsByYear W20807831072012 @default.
• W2080783107 countsByYear W20807831072013 @default.
• W2080783107 countsByYear W20807831072014 @default.
• W2080783107 countsByYear W20807831072015 @default.
• W2080783107 countsByYear W20807831072016 @default.
• W2080783107 countsByYear W20807831072018 @default.
• W2080783107 countsByYear W20807831072020 @default.
• W2080783107 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2080783107 hasAuthorship W2080783107A5005761175 @default.
• W2080783107 hasAuthorship W2080783107A5007052796 @default.
• W2080783107 hasAuthorship W2080783107A5025842153 @default.
• W2080783107 hasAuthorship W2080783107A5029576395 @default.
• W2080783107 hasAuthorship W2080783107A5042078064 @default.
• W2080783107 hasAuthorship W2080783107A5074754329 @default.
• W2080783107 hasAuthorship W2080783107A5084525714 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConcept C163716698 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConcept C2909816296 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConcept C2985379065 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConceptScore W2080783107C126838900 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConceptScore W2080783107C141071460 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConceptScore W2080783107C163716698 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConceptScore W2080783107C2909816296 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConceptScore W2080783107C2985379065 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConceptScore W2080783107C2989005 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConceptScore W2080783107C36454342 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConceptScore W2080783107C544519230 @default.
• W2080783107 hasConceptScore W2080783107C71924100 @default.
• W2080783107 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W2080783107 hasLocation W20807831071 @default.
• W2080783107 hasLocation W20807831072 @default.
• W2080783107 hasOpenAccess W2080783107 @default.
• W2080783107 hasPrimaryLocation W20807831071 @default.
• W2080783107 hasRelatedWork W1981800027 @default.
• W2080783107 hasRelatedWork W1990741171 @default.
• W2080783107 hasRelatedWork W2051016982 @default.
• W2080783107 hasRelatedWork W2063668808 @default.
• W2080783107 hasRelatedWork W2084124215 @default.
• W2080783107 hasRelatedWork W2421106607 @default.
• W2080783107 hasRelatedWork W2471226844 @default.
• W2080783107 hasRelatedWork W4235484761 @default.
• W2080783107 hasRelatedWork W4250549352 @default.
• W2080783107 hasRelatedWork W79237654 @default.
• W2080783107 hasVolume "87" @default.
• W2080783107 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2080783107 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2080783107 magId "2080783107" @default.
• W2080783107 workType "article" @default.