FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2080787620> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2080787620 abstract "The study sample was derived from dental hospital patients awaiting the provision of a mandibular bilateral free-end removable partial denture (RPD). Inclusion criteria included the following: (1) maximum of 8 remaining mandibular teeth; (2) 1 to 2 anterior teeth spaces allowed, provided they were restorable using resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (FPDs); and (3) plaque score of 20% or less. Exclusion criteria were the following: (1) presence of maxillary molars; (2) maxillary tooth or teeth that would be unopposed by a proposed mandibular prosthesis; and (3) medical condition that precluded active treatment or prescribed diet. Before randomization, all potentially eligible participants had received a preparatory treatment including oral hygiene and restorative and periodontal treatment, if necessary. Sixty participants (25 men and 35 women;median age 67 years; range 39-81 years) were enrolled in the study and randomly allocated into 2 treatment groups (n = 30 per group) matched for age and sex. The dates of the recruitment to the study were not given, but all new prostheses were constructed and fitted between June 1995 and July 1997.The primary treatment of interest was the distal cantilever resin-bonded FPDs. The control treatment was RPDs. Cantilever resin-bonded FPDs restored 1 occlusal unit, up to but not beyond the second premolar, using single pontic cantilevers from a single abutment whenever possible.Patient satisfaction was assessed using self-administrated questionnaires, piloted for this study, at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year after the provision of the new prostheses. A lower median satisfaction score indicated a higher level of satisfaction. These questionnaires included items about overall satisfaction with teeth, appearance of teeth, ability to chew, and bite and level of satisfaction, as well as comfort with the prosthesis.The mandibular shortened dental arches opposed a complete maxillary denture in 51 participants, opposed partial maxillary dentures in 7 participants, and opposed natural maxillary teeth in only 2 participants. Fifty-two patients attended the 3-month and 1-year follow-up assessments. There were no differences in the baseline satisfaction of the 2 treatment groups. The within-group changes in summary satisfaction scores indicated significantly higher satisfaction for both treatment groups from baseline (median FPD = 17.5, RPD = 16.5) to the 3-month (median FPD = 13.5, RPD = 13.0) and 1-year follow-up assessments (median FPD = 11.0, median RPD = 13.0). No between-group differences were detected (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P < .05). Improvements in levels of general satisfaction with teeth (P = .05) and the appearance of teeth (P = .12) were significant only for the FPD group. Significant improvements in perceived masticatory ability and perceived levels of comfort were found in both groups (P < or = .05).The authors concluded that resin-bonded cantilever FPDs are an effective means of restoring a mandibular shortened dental arch in terms of patient comfort and acceptance compared to treatments with RPDs." @default.
• W2080787620 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2080787620 creator A5049424000 @default.
• W2080787620 creator A5069950387 @default.
• W2080787620 date "2010-03-01" @default.
• W2080787620 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2080787620 title "Resin-bonded Cantilever Partial Dentures are Effective in Terms of Patient Satisfaction in the Restoration of the Mandibular Shortened Dental Arch" @default.
• W2080787620 cites W190327258 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W195534644 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W1971172970 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W1982233097 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2000218250 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2021885795 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2026600543 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2033797390 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2038971214 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2073376925 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2093933783 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2098156575 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2106785379 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2121585212 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2131638318 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2145657157 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2163993883 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2408756508 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2410125459 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2418445014 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2431687202 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2466258774 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W82430310 @default.
• W2080787620 cites W2563000876 @default.
• W2080787620 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2009.11.021" @default.
• W2080787620 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20230975" @default.
• W2080787620 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2080787620 type Work @default.
• W2080787620 sameAs 2080787620 @default.
• W2080787620 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2080787620 countsByYear W20807876202012 @default.
• W2080787620 countsByYear W20807876202013 @default.
• W2080787620 countsByYear W20807876202018 @default.
• W2080787620 countsByYear W20807876202020 @default.
• W2080787620 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2080787620 hasAuthorship W2080787620A5049424000 @default.
• W2080787620 hasAuthorship W2080787620A5069950387 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C11312509 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C2777982226 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C2780062004 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C11312509 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C127413603 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C141071460 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C147176958 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C159110408 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C168563851 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C199343813 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C2775944032 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C2777982226 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C2780062004 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C29694066 @default.
• W2080787620 hasConceptScore W2080787620C71924100 @default.
• W2080787620 hasLocation W20807876201 @default.
• W2080787620 hasLocation W20807876202 @default.
• W2080787620 hasOpenAccess W2080787620 @default.
• W2080787620 hasPrimaryLocation W20807876201 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W1923148487 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2015401947 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2017319319 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2031825067 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2068413326 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2069851687 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2092752006 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2101251260 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2122223899 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2395458346 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2404686497 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2407747839 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2408784835 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2474738811 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2513492483 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2767178070 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2962078863 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W2978675856 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W3208979640 @default.
• W2080787620 hasRelatedWork W3936436 @default.
• W2080787620 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2080787620 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2080787620 magId "2080787620" @default.
• W2080787620 workType "article" @default.