Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2080989141> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 73 of
73
with 100 items per page.
- W2080989141 endingPage "55" @default.
- W2080989141 startingPage "55" @default.
- W2080989141 abstract "Purpose: The Pinna-Brelstaff illusion (Pinna & Brelstaff, 2000, Vision Research) consists of two concentric rings of micropatterns that appear to counter-rotate when the observer moves towards and away from the image. There have been several anecdotal reports that the illusion is stronger when the retinal motion (expansion and contraction of the stimulus) is produced by self-motion rather than by expansion and contraction of the stimulus on the computer screen. Method: Our displays consisted of two concentric rings of Gabor patches. Each micropattern was oriented ±? degrees from the line that connects it to the centre of the display (Gurnsey et al., 2002, Perception). Nine displays were created with θ ranging from 0 to 90 degrees. Subjects first made relative salience judgements (for all possible pairs of θ) under both self-motion and screen-motion conditions. Subjects then judged which of two identical retinal motions—one produced under conditions of screen motion and another under conditions of self motion—produced the stronger illusion. Results: The relative salience judgements made under conditions of screen- and self-motion produced identical dependence on θ, with peak salience occurring at approximately θ = 31. For all values of θ screen motion produced the more salient illusion and in several cases the difference was statistically different from chance. Conclusions: Contrary to anecdotal reports the Pinna-Brelstaff illusion is not strongest under conditions of self-motion; if anything, the opposite is true. Therefore, there is no need to consider a role for extraretinal inputs in determining the strength of the illusion. It should be noted however that the percepts differ under conditions of self motion and screen motion. Under conditions of self motion there is size constancy but not under conditions of screen motion. Nevertheless, the extra retinal contributions leading to size constancy do not affect the strength of the illusion." @default.
- W2080989141 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2080989141 creator A5025459313 @default.
- W2080989141 creator A5051707646 @default.
- W2080989141 date "2010-03-17" @default.
- W2080989141 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2080989141 title "The Pinna -Brelstaff Illusion is not optimal under self-motion conditions" @default.
- W2080989141 doi "https://doi.org/10.1167/5.8.55" @default.
- W2080989141 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2080989141 type Work @default.
- W2080989141 sameAs 2080989141 @default.
- W2080989141 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2080989141 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2080989141 hasAuthorship W2080989141A5025459313 @default.
- W2080989141 hasAuthorship W2080989141A5051707646 @default.
- W2080989141 hasBestOaLocation W20809891411 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C108154423 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C139793654 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C184047640 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C2779918689 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C2781380971 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C48575856 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConcept C90296322 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C105702510 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C108154423 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C139793654 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C15744967 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C169760540 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C180747234 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C184047640 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C2524010 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C26760741 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C2779918689 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C2781380971 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C31972630 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C33923547 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C41008148 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C46312422 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C48575856 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C71924100 @default.
- W2080989141 hasConceptScore W2080989141C90296322 @default.
- W2080989141 hasIssue "8" @default.
- W2080989141 hasLocation W20809891411 @default.
- W2080989141 hasOpenAccess W2080989141 @default.
- W2080989141 hasPrimaryLocation W20809891411 @default.
- W2080989141 hasRelatedWork W1967918484 @default.
- W2080989141 hasRelatedWork W1971889275 @default.
- W2080989141 hasRelatedWork W2269610167 @default.
- W2080989141 hasRelatedWork W2319150931 @default.
- W2080989141 hasRelatedWork W2381962929 @default.
- W2080989141 hasRelatedWork W2889442810 @default.
- W2080989141 hasRelatedWork W2950198320 @default.
- W2080989141 hasRelatedWork W3048526225 @default.
- W2080989141 hasRelatedWork W4220982687 @default.
- W2080989141 hasRelatedWork W71341641 @default.
- W2080989141 hasVolume "5" @default.
- W2080989141 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2080989141 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2080989141 magId "2080989141" @default.
- W2080989141 workType "article" @default.