FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2081194775> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2081194775 endingPage "188" @default.
• W2081194775 startingPage "177" @default.
• W2081194775 abstract "Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and ManagementVol. 06, No. 02, pp. 177-188 (2004) No AccessEIA SCREENING FOR CHANGES AND EXTENSIONS TO EXISTING PROJECTS: APPLYING AN EU PERSPECTIVEJOE WESTONJOE WESTONImpacts Assessment Unit, Department of Planning, Oxford Brookes University, UK Search for more papers by this author https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333204001651Cited by:2 PreviousNext AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsRecommend to Library ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail AbstractDirective 97/11/EC, amending the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive (85/337/EEC), introduced a number of key changes to the procedures of EIA in the European Union (EU). One significant amendment was the introduction of a requirement for EIAs to be completed for changes or extensions to Annex I or II projects that have already been authorised executed or are in the process of being executed and which are likely to have significant adverse effects on the environment (CEC, 1997). That requirement imposes a duty on competent authorities to screen all changes and extensions of Annex I and Annex II projects for the need for EIA. Applying legal and policy principles established in the European Union, the scope of what constitute relevant changes and extensions is very wide. Given this wide scope, it would be reasonable to assume that screening changes or extensions would have been a major growth area of EIA activity in the UK. However, evidence presented here indicates just the opposite and suggests that many local planning authorities are not fully aware of the full implications of this clause in the EIA Directive. Furthermore, for the full implications of the changes and extensions clause to be implemented in the UK may require further amendments to the EIA legislation.Keywords:Changes and extensionsEIAEuropean Unionscreeningsignificant adverse effects References R. B. Beattie, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 15(2), 109 (1995). Crossref, Google ScholarS. Bell and S. McGillivray, Environmental Law, 5th edn. (Blackstone Press, London, 2000). Google Scholar Commission of the European Community (CEC) , The Commission's COM (2000) 1 Final, Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle ( CEC , Brussels ) . Google Scholar CEC , Council Directive 85/337/EEC (as amended by Directive 97/11/EC) on the assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment ( CEC , Brussels , 1997 ) . Google Scholar CEC , Environmental Impact Assessment Guidance on Screening ( CEC , Brussels , 2001 ) . Google Scholar CEC , Assessment of Plans and Projects Significantly Affecting Natura 2000 Sites Methodological Guidance on the Provisions of Article 6(3) and (4) of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC ( CEC , Luxembourg , 2002 ) . Google Scholar CEC , Report from the Commission to the European Parliament andthe Council on the Application and Effectiveness of the EIA Directive (Directive 85/337/EEC as Amended by Directive 97/1 1/EC): How Successful Are the Member States in Implementing the EIA Directive ( CEC , Brussels , 2003 ) . Google Scholar DETR , Circular 02/99 Environmental Impact Assessment ( Stationery Office , London , 1999 ) . Google Scholar DETR , Environmental Impact Assessment: A Guide to the Procedures ( Thomas Telford Publishing , Tonbridge , 2000 ) . Google Scholar Fortlage , Environmental Assessment: A Practical Guide ( Gower Technical , London , 1990 ) . Google Scholar R. Frost , Planning and Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice , ed. J. Weston ( Longman , London , 1997 ) . Google Scholar J. Glasson , R. Therivel and A. Chadwick , Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment , 2nd edn. ( UCL Press , London , 1999 ) . Google Scholar Government of Ireland (GoI) , Statutory Instruments. S.I. No. 93 of 1999. European Communities (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amendment) Regulations, 1999 ( The Stationary Office , Dublin , 1999 ) . Google ScholarB. Johnston, Planning 1370, 12 (2000). Google ScholarR. Macrory and S. Turner, Common Market Law Review 39, 489 (2002), DOI: 10.1023/A:1015895513482. Crossref, Google Scholar Ministry of Housing , The Text of the Regulations on Environmental Impact Assessment in the Netherlands ( Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (Netherlands) , The Haig , 2000 ) . Google Scholar Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) , Review of Permitted Development Rights ( Her Majesty's Stationary Office , London , 2003 ) . Google ScholarT. Scrase, Journal of Planning and Environmental Law 679 (1999). Google ScholarM. Stallworth, Journal of Environmental Law 10(2), 363 (1998). Google Scholar Weston, J. (2000). Screening, Scoping and ES Review under the 1999 EIA Regulations. Working Paper No. Oxford, 184, Oxford Brookes University . Google ScholarJ. Weston, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45, 3425 (2002), DOI: 10.1080/09640560220133432. Google Scholar C. Wood , Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review ( Longman , London , 1995 ) . Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By 2Simulations of EIA screening across jurisdictions: exposing the case for harmonic criteria?Caroline Priscila Fan Rocha and Alberto Fonseca5 January 2017 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 35, No. 3Screening for environmental impact assessment projects in England: what screening?Joe Weston1 Jun 2011 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 29, No. 2 Recommended Vol. 06, No. 02 Metrics History Received 27 November 2004 Revised 27 January 2004 Accepted 3 February 2004 KeywordsChanges and extensionsEIAEuropean Unionscreeningsignificant adverse effectsPDF download" @default.
• W2081194775 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2081194775 creator A5040327746 @default.
• W2081194775 date "2004-06-01" @default.
• W2081194775 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2081194775 title "EIA SCREENING FOR CHANGES AND EXTENSIONS TO EXISTING PROJECTS: APPLYING AN EU PERSPECTIVE" @default.
• W2081194775 cites W1844001800 @default.
• W2081194775 cites W1994524422 @default.
• W2081194775 doi "https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333204001651" @default.
• W2081194775 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2081194775 type Work @default.
• W2081194775 sameAs 2081194775 @default.
• W2081194775 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2081194775 countsByYear W20811947752016 @default.
• W2081194775 countsByYear W20811947752017 @default.
• W2081194775 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2081194775 hasAuthorship W2081194775A5040327746 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C111874474 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C164749845 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C2779103253 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C2779547435 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C107826830 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C111874474 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C111919701 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C144133560 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C155202549 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C162324750 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C164749845 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C17744445 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C199360897 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C199539241 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C205649164 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C2777351106 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C2778012447 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C2779103253 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C2779547435 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C2910001868 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C3116431 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C41008148 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C91375879 @default.
• W2081194775 hasConceptScore W2081194775C98045186 @default.
• W2081194775 hasIssue "02" @default.
• W2081194775 hasLocation W20811947751 @default.
• W2081194775 hasOpenAccess W2081194775 @default.
• W2081194775 hasPrimaryLocation W20811947751 @default.
• W2081194775 hasRelatedWork W1975447870 @default.
• W2081194775 hasRelatedWork W2025456744 @default.
• W2081194775 hasRelatedWork W2033208192 @default.
• W2081194775 hasRelatedWork W2037943553 @default.
• W2081194775 hasRelatedWork W2059812641 @default.
• W2081194775 hasRelatedWork W2100910813 @default.
• W2081194775 hasRelatedWork W2389199503 @default.
• W2081194775 hasRelatedWork W2504094719 @default.
• W2081194775 hasRelatedWork W2617960035 @default.
• W2081194775 hasRelatedWork W4214558672 @default.
• W2081194775 hasVolume "06" @default.
• W2081194775 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2081194775 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2081194775 magId "2081194775" @default.
• W2081194775 workType "article" @default.