FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2081205049> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2081205049 endingPage "659" @default.
• W2081205049 startingPage "656" @default.
• W2081205049 abstract "T landmark issue of Medical Decision Making summarizes important deliberations about best practices for simulation modeling. This body of work represents the third major set of recommendations for modeling best practices in the past 2 decades. The current project, sponsored jointly by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and the Society for Medical Decision Making, builds on and extends prior efforts to set standards for the conduct of modeling. These new articles provide modelers with guidance on building more useful models and consumers with benchmarks to judge the quality of the models. These thoughtful guidelines should strengthen the integrity of the model development process and encourage broader use of models in decision making. Modeling has long been embraced by the medical decision-making community and other researchers concerned with evidence-based practices and outcomes. In 2009, simulation modeling was recommended by the Institute of Medicine as a method to quantify the net impact of medical interventions. More recently, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute has been charged with using a variety of methods, including modeling, to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of medical interventions (www.pcori.org). In addition, more complex and biologically accurate models are now possible because of computing and information technology advances. Until recently, however, models affected few coverage and policy decisions in the United States. Models were used in setting American Cancer Society cervical cancer screening guidelines in the 1980s. In the late 1980s, the US Congress’ Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) commissioned models to evaluate screening for cervical and breast cancer under the Medicare program. The results were influential in the decisions to extend Medicare benefits to include Pap smears and mammography between 1988 and 1990. Unfortunately, the OTA was de-funded in 1995. Cancer modeling gained renewed support in 1999, when the Institute of Medicine released a report on the quality of care and called for greater inclusion of cancer outcomes research at the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Meanwhile, outside of the United States, modeling has been and continues to be used to guide policy on a routine basis. In the United Kingdom, for example, cost-effectiveness results from models are required for health care coverage decisions. Modeling of cancer interventions was advanced in the late 1990s with the funding of NCI’s Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET). Over the past 15 years, CISNET has gained traction in advancing the use of modeling to inform policy and clinical practice. Several aspects of the CISNET modeling approach have contributed to its success, including use of best modeling practices, similar to those outlined in this issue; deployment of more than one model to address a specific research question; development of a template for the description of the models; and commitment to transparency and collaboration. For example, by having Building Better Models: If We Build Them, Will Policy Makers Use Them? Toward Integrating Modeling into Health Care Decisions" @default.
• W2081205049 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2081205049 creator A5015387586 @default.
• W2081205049 creator A5042383020 @default.
• W2081205049 creator A5054819123 @default.
• W2081205049 creator A5057554019 @default.
• W2081205049 creator A5064344218 @default.
• W2081205049 creator A5065778332 @default.
• W2081205049 date "2012-09-01" @default.
• W2081205049 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2081205049 title "Building Better Models" @default.
• W2081205049 cites W167531114 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W1978467927 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W1978915215 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2011525958 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2013329800 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2014379348 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2019499889 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2022448393 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2026002591 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2029531103 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2030954367 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2043669741 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2072614847 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2076003266 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2080425334 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2087665936 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2087870203 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2100951779 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2107227392 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2107405926 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2109765527 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2122310552 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2132708603 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2134023402 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2134472318 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2139793607 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2143532751 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2150712216 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2157927416 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2158536041 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2166355860 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2167011268 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W2793717112 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W4233921329 @default.
• W2081205049 cites W4245193238 @default.
• W2081205049 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x12458978" @default.
• W2081205049 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4503228" @default.
• W2081205049 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22990079" @default.
• W2081205049 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2081205049 type Work @default.
• W2081205049 sameAs 2081205049 @default.
• W2081205049 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2081205049 countsByYear W20812050492013 @default.
• W2081205049 countsByYear W20812050492014 @default.
• W2081205049 countsByYear W20812050492015 @default.
• W2081205049 countsByYear W20812050492016 @default.
• W2081205049 countsByYear W20812050492017 @default.
• W2081205049 countsByYear W20812050492018 @default.
• W2081205049 countsByYear W20812050492019 @default.
• W2081205049 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2081205049 hasAuthorship W2081205049A5015387586 @default.
• W2081205049 hasAuthorship W2081205049A5042383020 @default.
• W2081205049 hasAuthorship W2081205049A5054819123 @default.
• W2081205049 hasAuthorship W2081205049A5057554019 @default.
• W2081205049 hasAuthorship W2081205049A5064344218 @default.
• W2081205049 hasAuthorship W2081205049A5065778332 @default.
• W2081205049 hasBestOaLocation W20812050492 @default.
• W2081205049 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2081205049 hasConceptScore W2081205049C41008148 @default.
• W2081205049 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2081205049 hasLocation W20812050491 @default.
• W2081205049 hasLocation W20812050492 @default.
• W2081205049 hasLocation W20812050493 @default.
• W2081205049 hasOpenAccess W2081205049 @default.
• W2081205049 hasPrimaryLocation W20812050491 @default.
• W2081205049 hasRelatedWork W1596801655 @default.
• W2081205049 hasRelatedWork W2130043461 @default.
• W2081205049 hasRelatedWork W2350741829 @default.
• W2081205049 hasRelatedWork W2358668433 @default.
• W2081205049 hasRelatedWork W2376932109 @default.
• W2081205049 hasRelatedWork W2382290278 @default.
• W2081205049 hasRelatedWork W2390279801 @default.
• W2081205049 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2081205049 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2081205049 hasRelatedWork W2530322880 @default.
• W2081205049 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W2081205049 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2081205049 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2081205049 magId "2081205049" @default.
• W2081205049 workType "article" @default.