Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2081238443> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W2081238443 endingPage "1140" @default.
- W2081238443 startingPage "1115" @default.
- W2081238443 abstract "The Supreme Court of Canada has recently rendered judgment in what has come to be known as the Omelet Case. The Court was called upon to rule on the constitutionality of several provisions in federal and Ontario law, the purpose of which was to set up a plan for the marketing of eggs in Canada. The plan provided for a levy on producers and had as its objectives the attribution to each province of a share of the national market for eggs, and the setting of production quotas within each province as regards its part of the market. Such quotas were to be set in an identical manner for all producers, whether they be engaged in intraprovincial, inter provincial, or export trade. The province of Ontario also provided for the imposition of quotas as to the means of production, particularly as to the number of domestic hens a producer could possess. This paper shows how the distribution of legislative powers in respect of taxation and commerce is affected by the Supreme Court's decision. It is suggested that the Court has completely abandoned the doctrine of the Crystal Dairy case, in which the Privy Council had ruled that the levying of fees on producers was a matter of taxation. The paper also outlines the consequences of certain remarks by Chief Justice Laskin on the spending power of Parliament. The paper then discusses the reticence of certain members of the Court to approve the measures adopted by Ontario concerning the control of means of production. Such reticence illustrates the difficulties faced by the Court when trying to define or identify which measures can be adopted by the provinces, within the framework of agricultural marketing plans, without encroaching upon federal jurisdiction over interprovincial trade under subs. 91(2) of the BNA Act . Finally, the paper attempts to show how the scope of s. 121 of the BNA Act is limited by the ruling that it cannot hamper federal regulation of interprovincial trade under subs. 91(2). This latest decision confirms the broadening of the scope of subs. 91(2), already apparent in the Caloil case and the Manitoba Egg reference. The strenghtening of subs. 91(2) may imply that s. 121 will be applied differently, according to whether federal or provincial legislation is involved." @default.
- W2081238443 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2081238443 creator A5035357701 @default.
- W2081238443 date "2005-04-12" @default.
- W2081238443 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2081238443 title "L'« affaire des omelettes » et ses conséquences sur le partage des compétences législatives en matière de taxation et de commerce" @default.
- W2081238443 doi "https://doi.org/10.7202/042290ar" @default.
- W2081238443 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2081238443 type Work @default.
- W2081238443 sameAs 2081238443 @default.
- W2081238443 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2081238443 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2081238443 hasAuthorship W2081238443A5035357701 @default.
- W2081238443 hasBestOaLocation W20812384431 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C2776512386 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C2778348673 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C2781440851 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C121332964 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C139621336 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C139719470 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C144133560 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C162324750 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C163258240 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C17744445 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C199539241 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C2776211767 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C2776512386 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C2778272461 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C2778348673 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C2781440851 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C62520636 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C83009810 @default.
- W2081238443 hasConceptScore W2081238443C94625758 @default.
- W2081238443 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2081238443 hasLocation W20812384431 @default.
- W2081238443 hasLocation W20812384432 @default.
- W2081238443 hasOpenAccess W2081238443 @default.
- W2081238443 hasPrimaryLocation W20812384431 @default.
- W2081238443 hasRelatedWork W2083144569 @default.
- W2081238443 hasRelatedWork W2485002428 @default.
- W2081238443 hasRelatedWork W2725712801 @default.
- W2081238443 hasRelatedWork W2959096931 @default.
- W2081238443 hasRelatedWork W3185723786 @default.
- W2081238443 hasRelatedWork W331466700 @default.
- W2081238443 hasRelatedWork W406158075 @default.
- W2081238443 hasRelatedWork W584965521 @default.
- W2081238443 hasRelatedWork W2511604048 @default.
- W2081238443 hasRelatedWork W2970917045 @default.
- W2081238443 hasVolume "19" @default.
- W2081238443 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2081238443 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2081238443 magId "2081238443" @default.
- W2081238443 workType "article" @default.